赞比亚第八个国家发展计划中的普惠金融目标

Peter Silwimba
{"title":"赞比亚第八个国家发展计划中的普惠金融目标","authors":"Peter Silwimba","doi":"10.36096/ijbes.v5i4.442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Zambia has not trailed behind other nations in promoting financial inclusion, one of its deliverables in its 2022-2026 Eighth National Development Plan. The analysis focused on the likelihood of reaching this goal and the implications for bank operating stability. A mixed research (quantitative and qualitative) approach was used and drew respondents from several remote areas in Zambia. A hypothesis test on the observed against the hypothesised mean (p-value = 1.93e-38 and <0.005) rejected the null to accept the alternative presupposition that banks have a relevant role in achieving financial inclusion, but they are not a necessary ingredient. The correlation test also aligned at both 95 and 99% confidence levels, that supported the null hypothesis to conclude that there is no correlation between the preferred channels of financial services and the adequacy of financial inclusion. Respondents felt that the financial inclusion services would still be offered at basic satisfactory levels regardless of the available form of financial service provider. The Kruskal-Wallis test supplemented the findings with p = 3.09667e-20(<0.05) that rejected null to conclude that any form of financial services is statistically significant in delivering basic financial inclusion in Zambia. The implications for banks are the risks for continuous survival because of the popular user-friendly alternative channels. It is recommended that the Bank of Zambia should sustain the relative relevance of formal banks by balancing their contributions with other innovative financial service channels. Banks should integrate with new market entrants, or the future will have a banking system without banks. Regulators must support banks’ survival traits such as the light set of criteria in their Know Your Customer (KYC) package.","PeriodicalId":150007,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Business Ecosystem &amp; Strategy (2687-2293)","volume":"2 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The goal of financial inclusion in Zambia’s 8th national development plan\",\"authors\":\"Peter Silwimba\",\"doi\":\"10.36096/ijbes.v5i4.442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Zambia has not trailed behind other nations in promoting financial inclusion, one of its deliverables in its 2022-2026 Eighth National Development Plan. The analysis focused on the likelihood of reaching this goal and the implications for bank operating stability. A mixed research (quantitative and qualitative) approach was used and drew respondents from several remote areas in Zambia. A hypothesis test on the observed against the hypothesised mean (p-value = 1.93e-38 and <0.005) rejected the null to accept the alternative presupposition that banks have a relevant role in achieving financial inclusion, but they are not a necessary ingredient. The correlation test also aligned at both 95 and 99% confidence levels, that supported the null hypothesis to conclude that there is no correlation between the preferred channels of financial services and the adequacy of financial inclusion. Respondents felt that the financial inclusion services would still be offered at basic satisfactory levels regardless of the available form of financial service provider. The Kruskal-Wallis test supplemented the findings with p = 3.09667e-20(<0.05) that rejected null to conclude that any form of financial services is statistically significant in delivering basic financial inclusion in Zambia. The implications for banks are the risks for continuous survival because of the popular user-friendly alternative channels. It is recommended that the Bank of Zambia should sustain the relative relevance of formal banks by balancing their contributions with other innovative financial service channels. Banks should integrate with new market entrants, or the future will have a banking system without banks. Regulators must support banks’ survival traits such as the light set of criteria in their Know Your Customer (KYC) package.\",\"PeriodicalId\":150007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Business Ecosystem &amp; Strategy (2687-2293)\",\"volume\":\"2 14\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Business Ecosystem &amp; Strategy (2687-2293)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36096/ijbes.v5i4.442\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Business Ecosystem &amp; Strategy (2687-2293)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36096/ijbes.v5i4.442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

赞比亚在促进金融包容性方面并不落后于其他国家,这是其 2022-2026 年第八个国家发展计划中的可实现目标之一。分析的重点是实现这一目标的可能性以及对银行经营稳定性的影响。研究采用了混合研究(定量和定性)方法,并从赞比亚几个偏远地区抽取了受访者。对观察到的平均值与假设的平均值进行了假设检验(P 值 = 1.93e-38 和 <0.005),结果否定了 null 假设,接受了另一假设,即银行在实现金融包容性方面发挥着相关作用,但并非必要因素。相关性检验也在 95% 和 99% 的置信水平上一致,支持零假设,即首选的金融服务渠道与普惠金融的充分性之间不存在相关性。受访者认为,无论金融服务提供商提供何种形式的金融服务,普惠金融服务都能达到基本满意的水平。Kruskal-Wallis 检验补充了这一结论,P = 3.09667e-20(<0.05)否定了 null,从而得出结论:在赞比亚,任何形式的金融服务在提供基本普惠金融方面都具有统计意义。这对银行的影响是,由于用户友好型替代渠道的流行,银行面临持续生存的风险。建议赞比亚银行通过平衡正规银行与其他创新金融服务渠道的贡献,维持正规银行的相对重要性。银行应与新的市场进入者融合,否则未来将出现一个没有银行的银行系统。监管机构必须支持银行的生存特质,如在其 "了解你的客户"(KYC)一揽子计划中制定一套严格的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The goal of financial inclusion in Zambia’s 8th national development plan
Zambia has not trailed behind other nations in promoting financial inclusion, one of its deliverables in its 2022-2026 Eighth National Development Plan. The analysis focused on the likelihood of reaching this goal and the implications for bank operating stability. A mixed research (quantitative and qualitative) approach was used and drew respondents from several remote areas in Zambia. A hypothesis test on the observed against the hypothesised mean (p-value = 1.93e-38 and <0.005) rejected the null to accept the alternative presupposition that banks have a relevant role in achieving financial inclusion, but they are not a necessary ingredient. The correlation test also aligned at both 95 and 99% confidence levels, that supported the null hypothesis to conclude that there is no correlation between the preferred channels of financial services and the adequacy of financial inclusion. Respondents felt that the financial inclusion services would still be offered at basic satisfactory levels regardless of the available form of financial service provider. The Kruskal-Wallis test supplemented the findings with p = 3.09667e-20(<0.05) that rejected null to conclude that any form of financial services is statistically significant in delivering basic financial inclusion in Zambia. The implications for banks are the risks for continuous survival because of the popular user-friendly alternative channels. It is recommended that the Bank of Zambia should sustain the relative relevance of formal banks by balancing their contributions with other innovative financial service channels. Banks should integrate with new market entrants, or the future will have a banking system without banks. Regulators must support banks’ survival traits such as the light set of criteria in their Know Your Customer (KYC) package.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信