E. Politsinskaya, Alexander Valerievich Trofimov, V. G. Lizunkov
{"title":"综合教育与产业集群的神经教学模式:评估准备劳动力资源的有效性","authors":"E. Politsinskaya, Alexander Valerievich Trofimov, V. G. Lizunkov","doi":"10.15293/2658-6762.2306.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The article discusses the problem of developing significant competencies for a future engineer. The purpose of the study is to substantiate the effectiveness of the neurodidactic model of an integrated educational and industrial cluster for preparing labor resources proposed by the authors. Materials and Methods. The research follows the logic of a pedagogical experiment. The development of the neurodidactic model was built on the analysis of pedagogical practices in introducing neuropedagogy into the educational process. As part of the study, the material obtained from the empirical data collection was analyzed and summarized. The sample consisted of 289 students majoring in technical areas of study. V. Smekal and M. Kucher’s “Personality orientation” inventory was chosen to confirm the effectiveness of the proposed neurodidactic model. Results. Theoretical analysis of scholarly literature made it possible to systematize the existing practices of introducing neuropedagogy into the educational process and reveal the most effective ones, as well as to identify factors determining the effectiveness of applying neurodidactic principles in the educational process. The formative experiment involved a revision of educational content and substantiation of the significance of the neurodidactic model of teaching and learning. As part of the formative experiment, most students developed a professional personality orientation, which plays an important role in the development of significant key competencies for an engineer. Conclusions. The research findings indicate that the neurodidactic learning model implemented within the educational process of the university ensures the professional orientation of the student’s personality and, as a result, obtaining high learning outcomes.","PeriodicalId":21621,"journal":{"name":"Science for Education Today","volume":"79 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neurodidactic model of an integrated educational and industrial cluster: Evaluating the effective-ness of preparing labor resources\",\"authors\":\"E. Politsinskaya, Alexander Valerievich Trofimov, V. G. Lizunkov\",\"doi\":\"10.15293/2658-6762.2306.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. The article discusses the problem of developing significant competencies for a future engineer. The purpose of the study is to substantiate the effectiveness of the neurodidactic model of an integrated educational and industrial cluster for preparing labor resources proposed by the authors. Materials and Methods. The research follows the logic of a pedagogical experiment. The development of the neurodidactic model was built on the analysis of pedagogical practices in introducing neuropedagogy into the educational process. As part of the study, the material obtained from the empirical data collection was analyzed and summarized. The sample consisted of 289 students majoring in technical areas of study. V. Smekal and M. Kucher’s “Personality orientation” inventory was chosen to confirm the effectiveness of the proposed neurodidactic model. Results. Theoretical analysis of scholarly literature made it possible to systematize the existing practices of introducing neuropedagogy into the educational process and reveal the most effective ones, as well as to identify factors determining the effectiveness of applying neurodidactic principles in the educational process. The formative experiment involved a revision of educational content and substantiation of the significance of the neurodidactic model of teaching and learning. As part of the formative experiment, most students developed a professional personality orientation, which plays an important role in the development of significant key competencies for an engineer. Conclusions. The research findings indicate that the neurodidactic learning model implemented within the educational process of the university ensures the professional orientation of the student’s personality and, as a result, obtaining high learning outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science for Education Today\",\"volume\":\"79 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science for Education Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2306.07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science for Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2306.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介文章讨论了培养未来工程师重要能力的问题。研究的目的是证实作者提出的综合教育和工业集群的神经教学模式在培养劳动力资源方面的有效性。材料和方法。研究遵循教学实验的逻辑。神经教学模式的开发基于对将神经教学法引入教育过程的教学实践的分析。作为研究的一部分,对从实证数据收集中获得的材料进行了分析和总结。样本包括 289 名主修技术专业的学生。选择了 V. Smekal 和 M. Kucher 的 "人格取向 "量表来确认所提议的神经教学模式的有效性。研究结果通过对学术文献的理论分析,可以系统整理将神经教学法引入教育过程的现有做法,揭示最有效的做法,并确定在教育过程中应用神经教学法原则的有效性的决定因素。形成性实验包括修订教学内容和证实神经教学法教学模式的意义。作为形成性实验的一部分,大多数学生都形成了专业人格取向,这在培养工程师的重要关键能力方面发挥了重要作用。结论。研究结果表明,在大学教育过程中实施的神经教学模式确保了学生的专业人格定位,并因此获得了较高的学习成果。
Neurodidactic model of an integrated educational and industrial cluster: Evaluating the effective-ness of preparing labor resources
Introduction. The article discusses the problem of developing significant competencies for a future engineer. The purpose of the study is to substantiate the effectiveness of the neurodidactic model of an integrated educational and industrial cluster for preparing labor resources proposed by the authors. Materials and Methods. The research follows the logic of a pedagogical experiment. The development of the neurodidactic model was built on the analysis of pedagogical practices in introducing neuropedagogy into the educational process. As part of the study, the material obtained from the empirical data collection was analyzed and summarized. The sample consisted of 289 students majoring in technical areas of study. V. Smekal and M. Kucher’s “Personality orientation” inventory was chosen to confirm the effectiveness of the proposed neurodidactic model. Results. Theoretical analysis of scholarly literature made it possible to systematize the existing practices of introducing neuropedagogy into the educational process and reveal the most effective ones, as well as to identify factors determining the effectiveness of applying neurodidactic principles in the educational process. The formative experiment involved a revision of educational content and substantiation of the significance of the neurodidactic model of teaching and learning. As part of the formative experiment, most students developed a professional personality orientation, which plays an important role in the development of significant key competencies for an engineer. Conclusions. The research findings indicate that the neurodidactic learning model implemented within the educational process of the university ensures the professional orientation of the student’s personality and, as a result, obtaining high learning outcomes.