{"title":"采用风险法的伊斯兰银行与传统银行健康水平比较","authors":"Fahmi Alif Firmansyah, Esy Nur Aisyah","doi":"10.37034/infeb.v5i4.717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to find out how the health level of Sharia Banks and Conventional Banks compares using the Risk-Based Bank Rating (RBBR) method. This research is quantitative research with comparative methods. This research data uses secondary data taken from the Bank Indonesia website. This research data analysis uses comparative quantitative statistics. The total sample is 10 banks consisting of 5 sharia banks and 5 conventional banks. The research results show that there is a significant (real) difference between the average value of credit risk in Islamic banks and conventional banks. There is no significant (real) difference between the average value of liquidity risk in Islamic banks and conventional banks. There is a significant (real) difference between the average ROA value for Islamic banks and conventional banks. There is no significant (real) difference between the average NIM value of Islamic banks and conventional banks. There is a significant (real) difference between the average CAR value for Islamic banks and conventional banks.","PeriodicalId":242689,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis","volume":"61 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Komparasi Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Syariah dan Bank Konvensional dengan Pendekatan Resiko\",\"authors\":\"Fahmi Alif Firmansyah, Esy Nur Aisyah\",\"doi\":\"10.37034/infeb.v5i4.717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aims to find out how the health level of Sharia Banks and Conventional Banks compares using the Risk-Based Bank Rating (RBBR) method. This research is quantitative research with comparative methods. This research data uses secondary data taken from the Bank Indonesia website. This research data analysis uses comparative quantitative statistics. The total sample is 10 banks consisting of 5 sharia banks and 5 conventional banks. The research results show that there is a significant (real) difference between the average value of credit risk in Islamic banks and conventional banks. There is no significant (real) difference between the average value of liquidity risk in Islamic banks and conventional banks. There is a significant (real) difference between the average ROA value for Islamic banks and conventional banks. There is no significant (real) difference between the average NIM value of Islamic banks and conventional banks. There is a significant (real) difference between the average CAR value for Islamic banks and conventional banks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":242689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis\",\"volume\":\"61 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37034/infeb.v5i4.717\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37034/infeb.v5i4.717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Komparasi Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Syariah dan Bank Konvensional dengan Pendekatan Resiko
This research aims to find out how the health level of Sharia Banks and Conventional Banks compares using the Risk-Based Bank Rating (RBBR) method. This research is quantitative research with comparative methods. This research data uses secondary data taken from the Bank Indonesia website. This research data analysis uses comparative quantitative statistics. The total sample is 10 banks consisting of 5 sharia banks and 5 conventional banks. The research results show that there is a significant (real) difference between the average value of credit risk in Islamic banks and conventional banks. There is no significant (real) difference between the average value of liquidity risk in Islamic banks and conventional banks. There is a significant (real) difference between the average ROA value for Islamic banks and conventional banks. There is no significant (real) difference between the average NIM value of Islamic banks and conventional banks. There is a significant (real) difference between the average CAR value for Islamic banks and conventional banks.