采用风险法的伊斯兰银行与传统银行健康水平比较

Fahmi Alif Firmansyah, Esy Nur Aisyah
{"title":"采用风险法的伊斯兰银行与传统银行健康水平比较","authors":"Fahmi Alif Firmansyah, Esy Nur Aisyah","doi":"10.37034/infeb.v5i4.717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to find out how the health level of Sharia Banks and Conventional Banks compares using the Risk-Based Bank Rating (RBBR) method. This research is quantitative research with comparative methods. This research data uses secondary data taken from the Bank Indonesia website. This research data analysis uses comparative quantitative statistics. The total sample is 10 banks consisting of 5 sharia banks and 5 conventional banks. The research results show that there is a significant (real) difference between the average value of credit risk in Islamic banks and conventional banks. There is no significant (real) difference between the average value of liquidity risk in Islamic banks and conventional banks. There is a significant (real) difference between the average ROA value for Islamic banks and conventional banks. There is no significant (real) difference between the average NIM value of Islamic banks and conventional banks. There is a significant (real) difference between the average CAR value for Islamic banks and conventional banks.","PeriodicalId":242689,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis","volume":"61 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Komparasi Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Syariah dan Bank Konvensional dengan Pendekatan Resiko\",\"authors\":\"Fahmi Alif Firmansyah, Esy Nur Aisyah\",\"doi\":\"10.37034/infeb.v5i4.717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aims to find out how the health level of Sharia Banks and Conventional Banks compares using the Risk-Based Bank Rating (RBBR) method. This research is quantitative research with comparative methods. This research data uses secondary data taken from the Bank Indonesia website. This research data analysis uses comparative quantitative statistics. The total sample is 10 banks consisting of 5 sharia banks and 5 conventional banks. The research results show that there is a significant (real) difference between the average value of credit risk in Islamic banks and conventional banks. There is no significant (real) difference between the average value of liquidity risk in Islamic banks and conventional banks. There is a significant (real) difference between the average ROA value for Islamic banks and conventional banks. There is no significant (real) difference between the average NIM value of Islamic banks and conventional banks. There is a significant (real) difference between the average CAR value for Islamic banks and conventional banks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":242689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis\",\"volume\":\"61 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37034/infeb.v5i4.717\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37034/infeb.v5i4.717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在利用基于风险的银行评级(RBBR)方法,了解伊斯兰教银行和传统银行的健康水平如何比较。本研究采用比较法进行定量研究。本研究使用的数据来自印度尼西亚银行网站的二手数据。本研究数据分析采用比较定量统计方法。样本总数为 10 家银行,包括 5 家伊斯兰教银行和 5 家传统银行。研究结果表明,伊斯兰银行和传统银行的信贷风险平均值存在显著(实际)差异。伊斯兰银行和传统银行的流动性风险平均值没有明显(实际)差异。伊斯兰银行与传统银行的投资回报率平均值之间存在重大(实际)差异。伊斯兰银行和传统银行的平均净资产收益率没有明显(实际)差异。伊斯兰银行和传统银行的平均资本充足率(CAR)值之间存在重大(实际)差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Komparasi Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Syariah dan Bank Konvensional dengan Pendekatan Resiko
This research aims to find out how the health level of Sharia Banks and Conventional Banks compares using the Risk-Based Bank Rating (RBBR) method. This research is quantitative research with comparative methods. This research data uses secondary data taken from the Bank Indonesia website. This research data analysis uses comparative quantitative statistics. The total sample is 10 banks consisting of 5 sharia banks and 5 conventional banks. The research results show that there is a significant (real) difference between the average value of credit risk in Islamic banks and conventional banks. There is no significant (real) difference between the average value of liquidity risk in Islamic banks and conventional banks. There is a significant (real) difference between the average ROA value for Islamic banks and conventional banks. There is no significant (real) difference between the average NIM value of Islamic banks and conventional banks. There is a significant (real) difference between the average CAR value for Islamic banks and conventional banks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信