#MassTestingNowPH tweets as acts of citizenship:疫情肆虐的菲律宾的推文修辞功能

IF 0.2 Q4 COMMUNICATION
Plaridel Pub Date : 2023-12-31 DOI:10.52518/2023-09ceplad
Charles Erize P. Ladia
{"title":"#MassTestingNowPH tweets as acts of citizenship:疫情肆虐的菲律宾的推文修辞功能","authors":"Charles Erize P. Ladia","doi":"10.52518/2023-09ceplad","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Constrained physical mobility and oppositional action during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines drove many Filipinos to turn to social media affordances, like Twitter’s hashtags, as sites of free speech, dissent, and collective action. One of which, #MassTestingNowPH, called for the implementation of mass testing for the vulnerable population and objected to Rodrigo Duterte’s militaristic pandemic response. This paper examined how #MassTestingNowPH tweets served as acts of citizenship and exerted their rhetorical functions in the digital space during this global medical crisis. Using rhetorical political analysis, this research found that #MassTestingNowPH tweets manifested acts of citizenship by asserting citizens’ rights and responsibilities, and exacting government’s accountability in newly-formed ad hoc publics. Users criticized the country’s COVID-19 response and the injustices of VIP testing for some of its officials. These criticisms enabled them to generate collective grievances for medical frontliners and the marginalized. With these sentiments, netizens called on their audiences to act on their judgment and assert their citizenship in online and offline platforms. These tweets, as acts of citizenship, performed three rhetorical functions: forensic, epideictic, and deliberative. This rhetorical process shaped Twitter’s hashtag as an ad hoc public and the meaning of citizenship in our highly-networked world.","PeriodicalId":40520,"journal":{"name":"Plaridel","volume":"10 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"#MassTestingNowPH tweets as acts of citizenship: The rhetorical functions of tweets in pandemic-stricken Philippines\",\"authors\":\"Charles Erize P. Ladia\",\"doi\":\"10.52518/2023-09ceplad\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Constrained physical mobility and oppositional action during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines drove many Filipinos to turn to social media affordances, like Twitter’s hashtags, as sites of free speech, dissent, and collective action. One of which, #MassTestingNowPH, called for the implementation of mass testing for the vulnerable population and objected to Rodrigo Duterte’s militaristic pandemic response. This paper examined how #MassTestingNowPH tweets served as acts of citizenship and exerted their rhetorical functions in the digital space during this global medical crisis. Using rhetorical political analysis, this research found that #MassTestingNowPH tweets manifested acts of citizenship by asserting citizens’ rights and responsibilities, and exacting government’s accountability in newly-formed ad hoc publics. Users criticized the country’s COVID-19 response and the injustices of VIP testing for some of its officials. These criticisms enabled them to generate collective grievances for medical frontliners and the marginalized. With these sentiments, netizens called on their audiences to act on their judgment and assert their citizenship in online and offline platforms. These tweets, as acts of citizenship, performed three rhetorical functions: forensic, epideictic, and deliberative. This rhetorical process shaped Twitter’s hashtag as an ad hoc public and the meaning of citizenship in our highly-networked world.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plaridel\",\"volume\":\"10 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plaridel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52518/2023-09ceplad\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plaridel","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52518/2023-09ceplad","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在菲律宾 COVID-19 大流行期间,受限的身体移动性和反对行动促使许多菲律宾人转向社交媒体,如 Twitter 的标签,将其作为自由言论、异议和集体行动的场所。其中,#MassTestingNowPH 呼吁对易感人群进行大规模检测,并反对罗德里戈-杜特尔特的军国主义疫情应对措施。本文探讨了在这场全球医疗危机中,#MassTestingNowPH 微博是如何作为公民行为在数字空间中发挥其修辞功能的。通过修辞政治分析,本研究发现,#MassTestingNowPH 微博通过在新形成的临时公共群体中主张公民权利和责任,并要求政府承担责任,体现了公民行为。用户批评了国家对 COVID-19 的反应以及对某些官员进行 VIP 检测的不公正做法。这些批评使他们能够为医疗前线人员和边缘化群体集体申冤。通过这些情绪,网民呼吁他们的受众根据自己的判断采取行动,并在在线和离线平台上坚持自己的公民身份。这些推文作为公民行为,发挥了三种修辞功能:法证、表意和审议。这一修辞过程塑造了推特的标签,使其成为一个特设的公众,也塑造了高度网络化世界中公民身份的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
#MassTestingNowPH tweets as acts of citizenship: The rhetorical functions of tweets in pandemic-stricken Philippines
Constrained physical mobility and oppositional action during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines drove many Filipinos to turn to social media affordances, like Twitter’s hashtags, as sites of free speech, dissent, and collective action. One of which, #MassTestingNowPH, called for the implementation of mass testing for the vulnerable population and objected to Rodrigo Duterte’s militaristic pandemic response. This paper examined how #MassTestingNowPH tweets served as acts of citizenship and exerted their rhetorical functions in the digital space during this global medical crisis. Using rhetorical political analysis, this research found that #MassTestingNowPH tweets manifested acts of citizenship by asserting citizens’ rights and responsibilities, and exacting government’s accountability in newly-formed ad hoc publics. Users criticized the country’s COVID-19 response and the injustices of VIP testing for some of its officials. These criticisms enabled them to generate collective grievances for medical frontliners and the marginalized. With these sentiments, netizens called on their audiences to act on their judgment and assert their citizenship in online and offline platforms. These tweets, as acts of citizenship, performed three rhetorical functions: forensic, epideictic, and deliberative. This rhetorical process shaped Twitter’s hashtag as an ad hoc public and the meaning of citizenship in our highly-networked world.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plaridel
Plaridel COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
66.70%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信