José Andrey Zamora-Araya, Karolayn Duarte-Abarca, Darcy Quesada-Varela, Mónica Prado-Abarca
{"title":"大学环境中的校风量表分析(ECEAU)","authors":"José Andrey Zamora-Araya, Karolayn Duarte-Abarca, Darcy Quesada-Varela, Mónica Prado-Abarca","doi":"10.15359/ru.38-1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[Objective] The aim of this paper is to verify the factorial structure of the School Climate Scale in University Environments (ECEAU) through structural equation models (SEM). [Methodology] A non-experimental cross-sectional study was carried out with a random sample of 381 students of the Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (UNA), to whom the ECEAU was applied. A SEM model was proposed to confirm the factor structure of the scale and an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to provide the basis for an alternative SEM model with a different structure. The reliability of scales was determined using McDonald’s omega, and the goodness of fit indexes used for the SEM models were the RMSEA, the CFI, the TLI and the GFI. The analysis was carried out using R software. [Results] The reliability of the scales in both models was adequate (w >0.70), although the metrics in the proposed model produced better results. The AFE suggested a different structure for the ECEAU, keeping some dimensions of the original structure and modifying and eliminating others. The goodness of fit indexes in both models were almost identical, with RMSEA=0.02, CFI=0.99, TLI=0.99 and GFI=0.98, which provides supporting evidence for the factorial structures proposed. [Conclusions] The original structure of the ECEAU was confirmed, while the differences in the results of the estimation and rotation methods generated another equally valid factorial structure for measuring the school climate construct in this university, and could be applied to other similar contexts.","PeriodicalId":42209,"journal":{"name":"Uniciencia","volume":"40 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the School Climate Scale in University Environments (ECEAU)\",\"authors\":\"José Andrey Zamora-Araya, Karolayn Duarte-Abarca, Darcy Quesada-Varela, Mónica Prado-Abarca\",\"doi\":\"10.15359/ru.38-1.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"[Objective] The aim of this paper is to verify the factorial structure of the School Climate Scale in University Environments (ECEAU) through structural equation models (SEM). [Methodology] A non-experimental cross-sectional study was carried out with a random sample of 381 students of the Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (UNA), to whom the ECEAU was applied. A SEM model was proposed to confirm the factor structure of the scale and an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to provide the basis for an alternative SEM model with a different structure. The reliability of scales was determined using McDonald’s omega, and the goodness of fit indexes used for the SEM models were the RMSEA, the CFI, the TLI and the GFI. The analysis was carried out using R software. [Results] The reliability of the scales in both models was adequate (w >0.70), although the metrics in the proposed model produced better results. The AFE suggested a different structure for the ECEAU, keeping some dimensions of the original structure and modifying and eliminating others. The goodness of fit indexes in both models were almost identical, with RMSEA=0.02, CFI=0.99, TLI=0.99 and GFI=0.98, which provides supporting evidence for the factorial structures proposed. [Conclusions] The original structure of the ECEAU was confirmed, while the differences in the results of the estimation and rotation methods generated another equally valid factorial structure for measuring the school climate construct in this university, and could be applied to other similar contexts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Uniciencia\",\"volume\":\"40 20\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Uniciencia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15359/ru.38-1.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uniciencia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15359/ru.38-1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
[目的] 本文旨在通过结构方程模型(SEM)验证大学环境下校园氛围量表(ECEAU)的因子结构。[方法] 对哥斯达黎加国立大学(UNA)的 381 名学生进行了非实验性横断面研究,并对其随机抽样。我们提出了一个 SEM 模型来确认量表的因子结构,并使用探索性因子分析(EFA)为另一个具有不同结构的 SEM 模型提供基础。量表的信度用麦克唐纳欧米茄来确定,SEM 模型的拟合优度指标为 RMSEA、CFI、TLI 和 GFI。分析使用 R 软件进行。[结果]两个模型中量表的可靠性都足够高(w>0.70),但拟议模型中的度量结果更好。分析量表建议采用不同的结构,保留原结构的某些维度,修改或取消其他维度。两个模型的拟合优度指标几乎相同,RMSEA=0.02,CFI=0.99,TLI=0.99,GFI=0.98,这为提出的因子结构提供了支持证据。[结论]ECEAU 的原始结构得到了确认,而估计和旋转方法结果的差异产生了另一种同样有效的阶乘结构,可用于测量这所大学的校风建设,并可应用于其他类似情况。
Analysis of the School Climate Scale in University Environments (ECEAU)
[Objective] The aim of this paper is to verify the factorial structure of the School Climate Scale in University Environments (ECEAU) through structural equation models (SEM). [Methodology] A non-experimental cross-sectional study was carried out with a random sample of 381 students of the Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (UNA), to whom the ECEAU was applied. A SEM model was proposed to confirm the factor structure of the scale and an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to provide the basis for an alternative SEM model with a different structure. The reliability of scales was determined using McDonald’s omega, and the goodness of fit indexes used for the SEM models were the RMSEA, the CFI, the TLI and the GFI. The analysis was carried out using R software. [Results] The reliability of the scales in both models was adequate (w >0.70), although the metrics in the proposed model produced better results. The AFE suggested a different structure for the ECEAU, keeping some dimensions of the original structure and modifying and eliminating others. The goodness of fit indexes in both models were almost identical, with RMSEA=0.02, CFI=0.99, TLI=0.99 and GFI=0.98, which provides supporting evidence for the factorial structures proposed. [Conclusions] The original structure of the ECEAU was confirmed, while the differences in the results of the estimation and rotation methods generated another equally valid factorial structure for measuring the school climate construct in this university, and could be applied to other similar contexts.