Ishaan Gupta MBBS, Ilana Nelson-Greenberg MD, Scott Mitchell Wright MD, Ché Matthew Harris MD, MS
{"title":"全美医院使用物理约束的情况:2011-2019","authors":"Ishaan Gupta MBBS, Ilana Nelson-Greenberg MD, Scott Mitchell Wright MD, Ché Matthew Harris MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine the change in rates of physical restraint (PR) use and associated outcomes among hospitalized adults.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>Using national inpatient sample databases, we analyzed years 2011-2014 and 2016-2019 to determine trends of PR usage. We also compared the years 2011-2012 and 2018-2019 to investigate rates of PR use, in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and total hospital charges.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 242,994,110 hospitalizations during the study period. 1,538,791 (0.63%) had coding to signify PRs, compared with 241,455,319 (99.3%), which did not. From 2011 to 2014, there was a significant increase in PR use (<em>p-</em>trend<.01) and a nonsignificant increase in PR rates from 2016-2019 (<em>p-</em>trend=.07). Over time, PR use increased (2011-2012: 0.52% vs 2018-2019: 0.73%; <em>p</em><.01). Patients with PRs reported a higher adjusted odds for in-hospital mortality in 2011-2012 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.9; 95% CI, 3.7-4.2; <em>p</em><.01) and 2018-2019 (aOR, 3.5; 95% CI, 3.4-3.7; <em>p</em><.01). Length of stay was prolonged for patients with PRs in 2011-2012 (adjusted mean difference [aMD], 4.3 days; 95% CI, 4.1-4.5; <em>p</em><.01) and even longer in 2018-2019 (aMD, 5.8 days; 95% CI, 5.6-6.0; <em>p</em><.01). Total hospital charges were higher for patients with PRs in 2011-2012 (aMD, +$55,003; 95% CI, $49,309-$60,679; <em>p</em><.01). Following adjustment for inflation, total charges remained higher for patients with PRs compared with those without PRs in 2018-2019 (aMD, +$70,018; 95% CI, $65,355-$74,680; <em>p</em><.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Overall, PR rates did not decrease across the study period, suggesting that messaging and promulgating best practice guidelines have yet to translate into a substantive change in practice patterns.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454823000784/pdfft?md5=251e31df642d392cd42bba037377ce0e&pid=1-s2.0-S2542454823000784-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physical Restraint Usage in Hospitals Across the United States: 2011-2019\",\"authors\":\"Ishaan Gupta MBBS, Ilana Nelson-Greenberg MD, Scott Mitchell Wright MD, Ché Matthew Harris MD, MS\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.12.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine the change in rates of physical restraint (PR) use and associated outcomes among hospitalized adults.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>Using national inpatient sample databases, we analyzed years 2011-2014 and 2016-2019 to determine trends of PR usage. We also compared the years 2011-2012 and 2018-2019 to investigate rates of PR use, in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and total hospital charges.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 242,994,110 hospitalizations during the study period. 1,538,791 (0.63%) had coding to signify PRs, compared with 241,455,319 (99.3%), which did not. From 2011 to 2014, there was a significant increase in PR use (<em>p-</em>trend<.01) and a nonsignificant increase in PR rates from 2016-2019 (<em>p-</em>trend=.07). Over time, PR use increased (2011-2012: 0.52% vs 2018-2019: 0.73%; <em>p</em><.01). Patients with PRs reported a higher adjusted odds for in-hospital mortality in 2011-2012 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.9; 95% CI, 3.7-4.2; <em>p</em><.01) and 2018-2019 (aOR, 3.5; 95% CI, 3.4-3.7; <em>p</em><.01). Length of stay was prolonged for patients with PRs in 2011-2012 (adjusted mean difference [aMD], 4.3 days; 95% CI, 4.1-4.5; <em>p</em><.01) and even longer in 2018-2019 (aMD, 5.8 days; 95% CI, 5.6-6.0; <em>p</em><.01). Total hospital charges were higher for patients with PRs in 2011-2012 (aMD, +$55,003; 95% CI, $49,309-$60,679; <em>p</em><.01). Following adjustment for inflation, total charges remained higher for patients with PRs compared with those without PRs in 2018-2019 (aMD, +$70,018; 95% CI, $65,355-$74,680; <em>p</em><.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Overall, PR rates did not decrease across the study period, suggesting that messaging and promulgating best practice guidelines have yet to translate into a substantive change in practice patterns.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454823000784/pdfft?md5=251e31df642d392cd42bba037377ce0e&pid=1-s2.0-S2542454823000784-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454823000784\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454823000784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Physical Restraint Usage in Hospitals Across the United States: 2011-2019
Objective
To determine the change in rates of physical restraint (PR) use and associated outcomes among hospitalized adults.
Patients and Methods
Using national inpatient sample databases, we analyzed years 2011-2014 and 2016-2019 to determine trends of PR usage. We also compared the years 2011-2012 and 2018-2019 to investigate rates of PR use, in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and total hospital charges.
Results
There were 242,994,110 hospitalizations during the study period. 1,538,791 (0.63%) had coding to signify PRs, compared with 241,455,319 (99.3%), which did not. From 2011 to 2014, there was a significant increase in PR use (p-trend<.01) and a nonsignificant increase in PR rates from 2016-2019 (p-trend=.07). Over time, PR use increased (2011-2012: 0.52% vs 2018-2019: 0.73%; p<.01). Patients with PRs reported a higher adjusted odds for in-hospital mortality in 2011-2012 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.9; 95% CI, 3.7-4.2; p<.01) and 2018-2019 (aOR, 3.5; 95% CI, 3.4-3.7; p<.01). Length of stay was prolonged for patients with PRs in 2011-2012 (adjusted mean difference [aMD], 4.3 days; 95% CI, 4.1-4.5; p<.01) and even longer in 2018-2019 (aMD, 5.8 days; 95% CI, 5.6-6.0; p<.01). Total hospital charges were higher for patients with PRs in 2011-2012 (aMD, +$55,003; 95% CI, $49,309-$60,679; p<.01). Following adjustment for inflation, total charges remained higher for patients with PRs compared with those without PRs in 2018-2019 (aMD, +$70,018; 95% CI, $65,355-$74,680; p<.01).
Conclusion
Overall, PR rates did not decrease across the study period, suggesting that messaging and promulgating best practice guidelines have yet to translate into a substantive change in practice patterns.