纤维来源对妊娠母猪和哺乳母猪生理特性和繁殖性能的影响

IF 1.4 4区 农林科学 Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Leonardo Francisco Rocha Ferreira, Itallo Conrado Sousa de Araújo, Ana Paula Liboreiro Brustolini, Idael Matheus Goes Lopes, Eloisa de Oliveira Simões Saliba, Walter Motta Ferreira, Soraia Viana Ferreira, Francisco Carlos de Oliveira Silva, Dalton de Oliveira Fontes
{"title":"纤维来源对妊娠母猪和哺乳母猪生理特性和繁殖性能的影响","authors":"Leonardo Francisco Rocha Ferreira, Itallo Conrado Sousa de Araújo, Ana Paula Liboreiro Brustolini, Idael Matheus Goes Lopes, Eloisa de Oliveira Simões Saliba, Walter Motta Ferreira, Soraia Viana Ferreira, Francisco Carlos de Oliveira Silva, Dalton de Oliveira Fontes","doi":"10.1071/an23033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong> Context</strong><p>Few experiments have demonstrated how alternative fibre sources such as micronised citrus pulp in the diet of sows during pregnancy and lactation can influence the productive and biochemical parameters of the sows.</p><strong> Aims</strong><p>The aim of the study was to compare different fibre sources fed to sows during gestation for effects on serum biochemical and reproductive parameters, and to determine how these effects may relate to sow and piglet performances.</p><strong> Methods</strong><p>In total, 220 sows of average initial liveweight 240.72 ± 29.42 kg were allotted to a completely randomised design with four treatments and 55 sows per treatment. The treatments comprised different fibre sources (micronised citrus pulp, soybean hulls and coffee husks) included in the feed, with a maize–soybean-meal-based diet as the control. Productive and biochemical parameters were assessed.</p><strong> Key results</strong><p>Productive and reproductive performance during gestation and lactation, and litter birth weight, were not influenced (<i>P</i> &gt; 0.05) by treatment. Placental efficiency (g fetus produced/g placenta) was lower (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05) in sows receiving soybean hulls than coffee husks (4.9 vs 5.4). Control sows presented lower (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05) stillborn rate than those supplemented with soybean hulls (1.08% vs 2.72%). Blood glucose, creatinine, lactate, triglycerides, total protein, cholesterol and urea were not influenced (<i>P</i> &gt; 0.05) by treatment. Postprandial blood glucose and triglycerides levels were higher (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05) than preprandial levels, whereas preprandial cholesterol was higher (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05) than postprandial (67.74 vs 62.51 mg/dL).</p><strong> Conclusion</strong><p>Diverse fibre sources minimally impacted sow performance; coffee husks emerged as a potentially advantageous choice.</p><strong> Implications</strong><p>Nutritional strategies to enhance reproductive and productive performance can be developed by incorporating coffee husks, micronised citrus pulp or soybean hulls in sows’ feed. Use of these fibre sources did not alter reproductive and productive parameters or blood metabolites of the sows.</p>","PeriodicalId":7895,"journal":{"name":"Animal Production Science","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of fibre sources on physiological properties and reproductive performance in gestating and lactating sows\",\"authors\":\"Leonardo Francisco Rocha Ferreira, Itallo Conrado Sousa de Araújo, Ana Paula Liboreiro Brustolini, Idael Matheus Goes Lopes, Eloisa de Oliveira Simões Saliba, Walter Motta Ferreira, Soraia Viana Ferreira, Francisco Carlos de Oliveira Silva, Dalton de Oliveira Fontes\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/an23033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<strong> Context</strong><p>Few experiments have demonstrated how alternative fibre sources such as micronised citrus pulp in the diet of sows during pregnancy and lactation can influence the productive and biochemical parameters of the sows.</p><strong> Aims</strong><p>The aim of the study was to compare different fibre sources fed to sows during gestation for effects on serum biochemical and reproductive parameters, and to determine how these effects may relate to sow and piglet performances.</p><strong> Methods</strong><p>In total, 220 sows of average initial liveweight 240.72 ± 29.42 kg were allotted to a completely randomised design with four treatments and 55 sows per treatment. The treatments comprised different fibre sources (micronised citrus pulp, soybean hulls and coffee husks) included in the feed, with a maize–soybean-meal-based diet as the control. Productive and biochemical parameters were assessed.</p><strong> Key results</strong><p>Productive and reproductive performance during gestation and lactation, and litter birth weight, were not influenced (<i>P</i> &gt; 0.05) by treatment. Placental efficiency (g fetus produced/g placenta) was lower (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05) in sows receiving soybean hulls than coffee husks (4.9 vs 5.4). Control sows presented lower (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05) stillborn rate than those supplemented with soybean hulls (1.08% vs 2.72%). Blood glucose, creatinine, lactate, triglycerides, total protein, cholesterol and urea were not influenced (<i>P</i> &gt; 0.05) by treatment. Postprandial blood glucose and triglycerides levels were higher (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05) than preprandial levels, whereas preprandial cholesterol was higher (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05) than postprandial (67.74 vs 62.51 mg/dL).</p><strong> Conclusion</strong><p>Diverse fibre sources minimally impacted sow performance; coffee husks emerged as a potentially advantageous choice.</p><strong> Implications</strong><p>Nutritional strategies to enhance reproductive and productive performance can be developed by incorporating coffee husks, micronised citrus pulp or soybean hulls in sows’ feed. Use of these fibre sources did not alter reproductive and productive parameters or blood metabolites of the sows.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Production Science\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Production Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/an23033\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Production Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/an23033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景很少有实验证明母猪妊娠和哺乳期日粮中的替代纤维来源(如微粉化柑橘浆)如何影响母猪的生产性能和生化指标。目的 本研究旨在比较妊娠期母猪饲喂不同纤维来源对血清生化和繁殖参数的影响,并确定这些影响与母猪和仔猪生产性能的关系。方法在完全随机设计中,共分配了 220 头初始平均活重为 240.72 ± 29.42 千克的母猪,每头母猪有四个处理,每个处理 55 头母猪。处理包括饲料中的不同纤维来源(微粉化柑橘浆、大豆壳和咖啡壳),对照组为以玉米-大豆粉为基础的日粮。对生产性能和生化指标进行了评估。主要结果妊娠期和哺乳期的生产性能和繁殖性能以及窝出生重不受处理的影响(P > 0.05)。接受大豆皮饲养的母猪的胎盘效率(生产胎儿克/胎盘)比接受咖啡壳饲养的母猪低(4.9 比 5.4)(P < 0.05)。对照组母猪的死胎率(1.08% vs 2.72%)低于添加豆壳的母猪(P < 0.05)。血糖、肌酐、乳酸、甘油三酯、总蛋白、胆固醇和尿素均未受治疗影响(P > 0.05)。餐后血糖和甘油三酯水平高于餐前水平(P < 0.05),而餐前胆固醇高于餐后水平(67.74 vs 62.51 mg/dL)(P < 0.05)。结论多种纤维来源对母猪生产性能的影响很小;咖啡壳是一种潜在的有利选择。意义通过在母猪饲料中添加咖啡壳、微粉化柑橘浆或大豆壳,可以制定提高繁殖和生产性能的营养策略。使用这些纤维来源不会改变母猪的繁殖和生产参数或血液代谢物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of fibre sources on physiological properties and reproductive performance in gestating and lactating sows
Context

Few experiments have demonstrated how alternative fibre sources such as micronised citrus pulp in the diet of sows during pregnancy and lactation can influence the productive and biochemical parameters of the sows.

Aims

The aim of the study was to compare different fibre sources fed to sows during gestation for effects on serum biochemical and reproductive parameters, and to determine how these effects may relate to sow and piglet performances.

Methods

In total, 220 sows of average initial liveweight 240.72 ± 29.42 kg were allotted to a completely randomised design with four treatments and 55 sows per treatment. The treatments comprised different fibre sources (micronised citrus pulp, soybean hulls and coffee husks) included in the feed, with a maize–soybean-meal-based diet as the control. Productive and biochemical parameters were assessed.

Key results

Productive and reproductive performance during gestation and lactation, and litter birth weight, were not influenced (P > 0.05) by treatment. Placental efficiency (g fetus produced/g placenta) was lower (P < 0.05) in sows receiving soybean hulls than coffee husks (4.9 vs 5.4). Control sows presented lower (P < 0.05) stillborn rate than those supplemented with soybean hulls (1.08% vs 2.72%). Blood glucose, creatinine, lactate, triglycerides, total protein, cholesterol and urea were not influenced (P > 0.05) by treatment. Postprandial blood glucose and triglycerides levels were higher (P < 0.05) than preprandial levels, whereas preprandial cholesterol was higher (P < 0.05) than postprandial (67.74 vs 62.51 mg/dL).

Conclusion

Diverse fibre sources minimally impacted sow performance; coffee husks emerged as a potentially advantageous choice.

Implications

Nutritional strategies to enhance reproductive and productive performance can be developed by incorporating coffee husks, micronised citrus pulp or soybean hulls in sows’ feed. Use of these fibre sources did not alter reproductive and productive parameters or blood metabolites of the sows.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Production Science
Animal Production Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
139
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Research papers in Animal Production Science focus on improving livestock and food production, and on the social and economic issues that influence primary producers. The journal (formerly known as Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture) is predominantly concerned with domesticated animals (beef cattle, dairy cows, sheep, pigs, goats and poultry); however, contributions on horses and wild animals may be published where relevant. Animal Production Science is published with the endorsement of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the Australian Academy of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信