调查疫苗犹豫不决对新发传染病的影响:数学和数值分析。

IF 1.8 4区 数学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Journal of Biological Dynamics Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-04 DOI:10.1080/17513758.2023.2298988
Indunil M Hewage, Kevin E M Church, Elissa J Schwartz
{"title":"调查疫苗犹豫不决对新发传染病的影响:数学和数值分析。","authors":"Indunil M Hewage, Kevin E M Church, Elissa J Schwartz","doi":"10.1080/17513758.2023.2298988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Throughout the last two centuries, vaccines have been helpful in mitigating numerous epidemic diseases. However, vaccine hesitancy has been identified as a substantial obstacle in healthcare management. We examined the epidemiological dynamics of an emerging infection under vaccination using an SVEIR model with differential morbidity. We mathematically analyzed the model, derived <math><msub><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mn>0</mn></msub></math>, and provided a complete analysis of the bifurcation at <math><msub><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mn>0</mn></msub><mo>=</mo><mn>1</mn></math>. Sensitivity analysis and numerical simulations were used to quantify the tradeoffs between vaccine efficacy and vaccine hesitancy on reducing the disease burden. Our results indicated that if the percentage of the population hesitant about taking the vaccine is 10%, then a vaccine with 94% efficacy is required to reduce the peak of infections by 40%. If 60% of the population is reluctant about being vaccinated, then even a perfect vaccine will not be able to reduce the peak of infections by 40%.</p>","PeriodicalId":48809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biological Dynamics","volume":"18 1","pages":"2298988"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the impact of vaccine hesitancy on an emerging infectious disease: a mathematical and numerical analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Indunil M Hewage, Kevin E M Church, Elissa J Schwartz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17513758.2023.2298988\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Throughout the last two centuries, vaccines have been helpful in mitigating numerous epidemic diseases. However, vaccine hesitancy has been identified as a substantial obstacle in healthcare management. We examined the epidemiological dynamics of an emerging infection under vaccination using an SVEIR model with differential morbidity. We mathematically analyzed the model, derived <math><msub><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mn>0</mn></msub></math>, and provided a complete analysis of the bifurcation at <math><msub><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mn>0</mn></msub><mo>=</mo><mn>1</mn></math>. Sensitivity analysis and numerical simulations were used to quantify the tradeoffs between vaccine efficacy and vaccine hesitancy on reducing the disease burden. Our results indicated that if the percentage of the population hesitant about taking the vaccine is 10%, then a vaccine with 94% efficacy is required to reduce the peak of infections by 40%. If 60% of the population is reluctant about being vaccinated, then even a perfect vaccine will not be able to reduce the peak of infections by 40%.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biological Dynamics\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"2298988\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biological Dynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17513758.2023.2298988\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biological Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17513758.2023.2298988","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的两个世纪中,疫苗在缓解众多流行病方面发挥了重要作用。然而,疫苗犹豫不决已被认为是医疗保健管理中的一大障碍。我们使用具有不同发病率的 SVEIR 模型研究了疫苗接种下新发传染病的流行动态。我们对模型进行了数学分析,得出了 R0,并对 R0=1 时的分岔进行了完整分析。我们利用敏感性分析和数值模拟来量化疫苗效力和疫苗犹豫不决对减少疾病负担的权衡。我们的结果表明,如果对接种疫苗犹豫不决的人口比例为 10%,那么需要 94% 效力的疫苗才能将感染峰值降低 40%。如果 60% 的人口不愿意接种疫苗,那么即使是完美的疫苗也无法将感染高峰降低 40%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating the impact of vaccine hesitancy on an emerging infectious disease: a mathematical and numerical analysis.

Throughout the last two centuries, vaccines have been helpful in mitigating numerous epidemic diseases. However, vaccine hesitancy has been identified as a substantial obstacle in healthcare management. We examined the epidemiological dynamics of an emerging infection under vaccination using an SVEIR model with differential morbidity. We mathematically analyzed the model, derived R0, and provided a complete analysis of the bifurcation at R0=1. Sensitivity analysis and numerical simulations were used to quantify the tradeoffs between vaccine efficacy and vaccine hesitancy on reducing the disease burden. Our results indicated that if the percentage of the population hesitant about taking the vaccine is 10%, then a vaccine with 94% efficacy is required to reduce the peak of infections by 40%. If 60% of the population is reluctant about being vaccinated, then even a perfect vaccine will not be able to reduce the peak of infections by 40%.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Biological Dynamics
Journal of Biological Dynamics ECOLOGY-MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
28
审稿时长
33 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Biological Dynamics, an open access journal, publishes state of the art papers dealing with the analysis of dynamic models that arise from biological processes. The Journal focuses on dynamic phenomena at scales ranging from the level of individual organisms to that of populations, communities, and ecosystems in the fields of ecology and evolutionary biology, population dynamics, epidemiology, immunology, neuroscience, environmental science, and animal behavior. Papers in other areas are acceptable at the editors’ discretion. In addition to papers that analyze original mathematical models and develop new theories and analytic methods, the Journal welcomes papers that connect mathematical modeling and analysis to experimental and observational data. The Journal also publishes short notes, expository and review articles, book reviews and a section on open problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信