欧洲的多病模式与残疾和医疗保健的使用:相关性是否随地区社会经济地位的变化而变化?

IF 3.7 2区 社会学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY
Lluís Zacarías-Pons, Oriol Turró-Garriga, Marc Saez, Josep Garre-Olmo
{"title":"欧洲的多病模式与残疾和医疗保健的使用:相关性是否随地区社会经济地位的变化而变化?","authors":"Lluís Zacarías-Pons, Oriol Turró-Garriga, Marc Saez, Josep Garre-Olmo","doi":"10.1007/s10433-023-00795-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multimorbidity, the concurrence of several chronic conditions, is a rising concern that increases the years lived with disability and poses a burden on healthcare systems. Little is known on how it interacts with socioeconomic deprivation, previously associated with poor health-related outcomes. We aimed to characterize the association between multimorbidity and these outcomes and how this relationship may change with socioeconomic development of regions. 55,915 individuals interviewed in 2017 were drawn from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe, a population-based study. A Latent Class Analysis was conducted to fit multimorbidity patterns based on 16 self-reported conditions. Physical limitation, quality-of-life and healthcare utilization outcomes were regressed on those patterns adjusting for additional covariates. Those analyses were then extended to assess whether such associations varied with the region socioeconomic status. We identified six different patterns, labelled according to their more predominant chronic conditions. After the \"healthy\" class, the \"metabolic\" and the \"osteoarticular\" classes had the best outcomes involving limitations and the lowest healthcare utilization. The \"neuro-affective-ulcer\" and the \"several conditions\" classes yielded the highest probabilities of physical limitation, whereas the \"cardiovascular\" group had the highest probability of hospitalization. The association of multimorbidity over physical limitations appeared to be stronger when living in a deprived region, especially for metabolic and osteoarticular conditions, whereas no major effect differences were found for healthcare use. Multimorbidity groups do differentiate in terms of limitation and healthcare utilization. Such differences are exacerbated with socioeconomic inequities between regions even within Europe.</p>","PeriodicalId":47766,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ageing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10764705/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multimorbidity patterns and disability and healthcare use in Europe: do the associations change with the regional socioeconomic status?\",\"authors\":\"Lluís Zacarías-Pons, Oriol Turró-Garriga, Marc Saez, Josep Garre-Olmo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10433-023-00795-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Multimorbidity, the concurrence of several chronic conditions, is a rising concern that increases the years lived with disability and poses a burden on healthcare systems. Little is known on how it interacts with socioeconomic deprivation, previously associated with poor health-related outcomes. We aimed to characterize the association between multimorbidity and these outcomes and how this relationship may change with socioeconomic development of regions. 55,915 individuals interviewed in 2017 were drawn from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe, a population-based study. A Latent Class Analysis was conducted to fit multimorbidity patterns based on 16 self-reported conditions. Physical limitation, quality-of-life and healthcare utilization outcomes were regressed on those patterns adjusting for additional covariates. Those analyses were then extended to assess whether such associations varied with the region socioeconomic status. We identified six different patterns, labelled according to their more predominant chronic conditions. After the \\\"healthy\\\" class, the \\\"metabolic\\\" and the \\\"osteoarticular\\\" classes had the best outcomes involving limitations and the lowest healthcare utilization. The \\\"neuro-affective-ulcer\\\" and the \\\"several conditions\\\" classes yielded the highest probabilities of physical limitation, whereas the \\\"cardiovascular\\\" group had the highest probability of hospitalization. The association of multimorbidity over physical limitations appeared to be stronger when living in a deprived region, especially for metabolic and osteoarticular conditions, whereas no major effect differences were found for healthcare use. Multimorbidity groups do differentiate in terms of limitation and healthcare utilization. Such differences are exacerbated with socioeconomic inequities between regions even within Europe.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Ageing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10764705/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Ageing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-023-00795-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-023-00795-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多病并发症是指多种慢性病同时存在,是一个日益受到关注的问题,它增加了残疾患者的生存年限,并给医疗保健系统带来负担。人们对多病症与社会经济贫困之间的相互作用知之甚少,而社会经济贫困曾与不良的健康相关结果联系在一起。我们旨在描述多病症与这些结果之间的关系,以及这种关系如何随着地区的社会经济发展而变化。我们从一项基于人口的研究--"欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查"(Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe)中抽取了 55915 名在 2017 年接受过访谈的人。根据 16 种自我报告的情况,进行了潜类分析,以拟合多病模式。根据这些模式对身体限制、生活质量和医疗保健利用率进行回归,并对其他协变量进行调整。然后对这些分析进行扩展,以评估这些关联是否随地区社会经济地位而变化。我们确定了六种不同的模式,并根据其更主要的慢性疾病进行了分类。在 "健康 "类别之后,"新陈代谢 "和 "骨关节 "类别的结果最好,涉及限制和医疗保健利用率最低。神经-情感-溃疡 "和 "多种病症 "组出现身体受限的概率最高,而 "心血管 "组出现住院的概率最高。如果生活在贫困地区,多病与身体受限的关系似乎更密切,尤其是代谢性疾病和骨关节疾病,而在医疗保健使用方面则没有发现重大的影响差异。多病群体在限制和医疗保健使用方面确实存在差异。即使在欧洲内部,地区之间的社会经济不平等也会加剧这种差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multimorbidity patterns and disability and healthcare use in Europe: do the associations change with the regional socioeconomic status?

Multimorbidity, the concurrence of several chronic conditions, is a rising concern that increases the years lived with disability and poses a burden on healthcare systems. Little is known on how it interacts with socioeconomic deprivation, previously associated with poor health-related outcomes. We aimed to characterize the association between multimorbidity and these outcomes and how this relationship may change with socioeconomic development of regions. 55,915 individuals interviewed in 2017 were drawn from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe, a population-based study. A Latent Class Analysis was conducted to fit multimorbidity patterns based on 16 self-reported conditions. Physical limitation, quality-of-life and healthcare utilization outcomes were regressed on those patterns adjusting for additional covariates. Those analyses were then extended to assess whether such associations varied with the region socioeconomic status. We identified six different patterns, labelled according to their more predominant chronic conditions. After the "healthy" class, the "metabolic" and the "osteoarticular" classes had the best outcomes involving limitations and the lowest healthcare utilization. The "neuro-affective-ulcer" and the "several conditions" classes yielded the highest probabilities of physical limitation, whereas the "cardiovascular" group had the highest probability of hospitalization. The association of multimorbidity over physical limitations appeared to be stronger when living in a deprived region, especially for metabolic and osteoarticular conditions, whereas no major effect differences were found for healthcare use. Multimorbidity groups do differentiate in terms of limitation and healthcare utilization. Such differences are exacerbated with socioeconomic inequities between regions even within Europe.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
7.90%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Ageing: Social, Behavioural and Health Perspectives is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to the understanding of ageing in European societies and the world over. EJA publishes original articles on the social, behavioral and population health aspects of ageing and encourages an integrated approach between these aspects. Emphasis is put on publishing empirical research (including meta-analyses), but conceptual papers (including narrative reviews) and methodological contributions will also be considered. EJA welcomes expert opinions on critical issues in ageing. By stimulating communication between researchers and those using research findings, it aims to contribute to the formulation of better policies and the development of better practice in serving older adults. To further specify, with the term ''social'' is meant the full scope of social science of ageing related research from the micro to the macro level of analysis. With the term ''behavioural'' the full scope of psychological ageing research including life span approaches based on a range of age groups from young to old is envisaged. The term ''population health-related'' denotes social-epidemiological and public health oriented research including research on functional health in the widest possible sense.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信