妊娠 24 周前终止妊娠的指征和结果--病例系列。

IF 0.5 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Şükran Doğru, Fatih Akkuş, Aslı A. Atci, Arif Caner Erdoğan, Ali Acar
{"title":"妊娠 24 周前终止妊娠的指征和结果--病例系列。","authors":"Şükran Doğru, Fatih Akkuş, Aslı A. Atci, Arif Caner Erdoğan, Ali Acar","doi":"10.48095/cccg2023428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess termination of pregnancy (TOP) indications and obstetric outcomes before the 24th gestational week.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study that includes terminations performed in singleton pregnancies between December 2021 and December 2022 in the Perinatology Clinic of Necmettin Erbakan University Meram Medical Faculty. According to the reasons for TOP, all patients were divided into three groups: maternal, fetal, and obstetric reasons. The termination approach and outcomes were evaluated in all cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 210 patients were included in the study. Considering termination indications, 18 (8.5%) patients had maternal causes, 127 (60.5%) had fetal causes, and 65 (31%) had obstetric causes. Maternal causes were significantly higher in the 1st trimester and fetal causes in the 2nd trimester (P = 0.001). In the maternal group, 77.8% dilatation and curettage were used, 70.1% misoprostol and 29.9% misoprostol + Foley catheter in the fetal group, and 66.2% misoprostol in the obstetric group (P = 0.0001). The length of hospital stay and recurrent revision curettage were not statistically different between the fetal, maternal, and obstetric groups (P = 0.099, P = 0.8, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Termination options should be offered for complicated pregnancies due to fetal, maternal, or obstetric reasons. Pregnancy termination week and indication affect morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":43333,"journal":{"name":"Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology","volume":"88 6","pages":"428-434"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pregnancy termination indications and outcomes before 24 weeks of gestation - a case series.\",\"authors\":\"Şükran Doğru, Fatih Akkuş, Aslı A. Atci, Arif Caner Erdoğan, Ali Acar\",\"doi\":\"10.48095/cccg2023428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess termination of pregnancy (TOP) indications and obstetric outcomes before the 24th gestational week.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study that includes terminations performed in singleton pregnancies between December 2021 and December 2022 in the Perinatology Clinic of Necmettin Erbakan University Meram Medical Faculty. According to the reasons for TOP, all patients were divided into three groups: maternal, fetal, and obstetric reasons. The termination approach and outcomes were evaluated in all cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 210 patients were included in the study. Considering termination indications, 18 (8.5%) patients had maternal causes, 127 (60.5%) had fetal causes, and 65 (31%) had obstetric causes. Maternal causes were significantly higher in the 1st trimester and fetal causes in the 2nd trimester (P = 0.001). In the maternal group, 77.8% dilatation and curettage were used, 70.1% misoprostol and 29.9% misoprostol + Foley catheter in the fetal group, and 66.2% misoprostol in the obstetric group (P = 0.0001). The length of hospital stay and recurrent revision curettage were not statistically different between the fetal, maternal, and obstetric groups (P = 0.099, P = 0.8, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Termination options should be offered for complicated pregnancies due to fetal, maternal, or obstetric reasons. Pregnancy termination week and indication affect morbidity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"88 6\",\"pages\":\"428-434\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48095/cccg2023428\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48095/cccg2023428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估妊娠 24 周前终止妊娠(TOP)的适应症和产科结果:本研究旨在评估第24孕周前终止妊娠(TOP)的适应症和产科结果:这是一项回顾性研究,包括 2021 年 12 月至 2022 年 12 月期间在内克梅廷-埃尔巴坎大学梅拉姆医学院围产期诊所实施的单胎妊娠终止手术。根据终止妊娠的原因,所有患者被分为三组:母体原因、胎儿原因和产科原因。对所有病例的终止妊娠方法和结果进行了评估:共有 210 名患者参与了研究。考虑到终止妊娠的原因,18 例(8.5%)患者为母体原因,127 例(60.5%)患者为胎儿原因,65 例(31%)患者为产科原因。母体原因在妊娠头三个月明显较多,胎儿原因在妊娠后三个月明显较多(P = 0.001)。在母体组中,77.8%使用了扩张和刮宫术,在胎儿组中,70.1%使用了米索前列醇,29.9%使用了米索前列醇+福里导管,在产科组中,66.2%使用了米索前列醇(P = 0.0001)。胎儿组、母体组和产科组的住院时间和复发改刮宫术无统计学差异(P = 0.099,P = 0.8):结论:因胎儿、母体或产科原因导致的复杂妊娠应选择终止妊娠。终止妊娠的周数和指征对发病率有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pregnancy termination indications and outcomes before 24 weeks of gestation - a case series.

Objective: This study aimed to assess termination of pregnancy (TOP) indications and obstetric outcomes before the 24th gestational week.

Materials and methods: This is a retrospective study that includes terminations performed in singleton pregnancies between December 2021 and December 2022 in the Perinatology Clinic of Necmettin Erbakan University Meram Medical Faculty. According to the reasons for TOP, all patients were divided into three groups: maternal, fetal, and obstetric reasons. The termination approach and outcomes were evaluated in all cases.

Results: A total of 210 patients were included in the study. Considering termination indications, 18 (8.5%) patients had maternal causes, 127 (60.5%) had fetal causes, and 65 (31%) had obstetric causes. Maternal causes were significantly higher in the 1st trimester and fetal causes in the 2nd trimester (P = 0.001). In the maternal group, 77.8% dilatation and curettage were used, 70.1% misoprostol and 29.9% misoprostol + Foley catheter in the fetal group, and 66.2% misoprostol in the obstetric group (P = 0.0001). The length of hospital stay and recurrent revision curettage were not statistically different between the fetal, maternal, and obstetric groups (P = 0.099, P = 0.8, respectively).

Conclusion: Termination options should be offered for complicated pregnancies due to fetal, maternal, or obstetric reasons. Pregnancy termination week and indication affect morbidity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology
Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信