测试可重复使用设备清洁验证的土壤和材料亲和性。

Q4 Medicine
Terra A Kremer, Christopher H Ratanski
{"title":"测试可重复使用设备清洁验证的土壤和材料亲和性。","authors":"Terra A Kremer, Christopher H Ratanski","doi":"10.2345/0899-8205-57.4.136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While selecting the test variables for a cleaning validation for reusable medical devices, the manufacturer must provide a simulative and clinically representative challenge for the device. An appropriate challenge must be identified with care so as not to overchallenge the cleaning process by selecting the worst case for every variable, thus leading to an impossible validation or unrealistic processing requirements. To appropriately select the testing variables, an understanding of the challenge to the cleaning process is important. The relationship among device material, test soil, and application method was investigated by testing 140 variable combinations, including seven materials (stainless steel, polyoxymethylene, polyether ether ketone, nitinol, aluminum, titanium, and silicone), four test soils (defibrinated blood soil, coagulated blood, modified coagulated blood, and Miles soil), and five soil application methods (pipetting neat, pipetting spreader, painting, handling with soiled gloves, and immersion). Stainless steel was the only material that showed consistent soil application in a thickness (at ~6 μL/cm<sup>2</sup>) that fully covered the test surface without some element of pooling, cracking, flaking, or soil migration with all test soils and application methods. The data collected using solubility testing indicated that a complex relationship for material adherence may exist between device materials and test soil. Stainless steel was the most challenging material tested.</p>","PeriodicalId":35656,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology","volume":"57 4","pages":"136-142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10764060/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Test Soil and Material Affinity for Reusable Device Cleaning Validations.\",\"authors\":\"Terra A Kremer, Christopher H Ratanski\",\"doi\":\"10.2345/0899-8205-57.4.136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>While selecting the test variables for a cleaning validation for reusable medical devices, the manufacturer must provide a simulative and clinically representative challenge for the device. An appropriate challenge must be identified with care so as not to overchallenge the cleaning process by selecting the worst case for every variable, thus leading to an impossible validation or unrealistic processing requirements. To appropriately select the testing variables, an understanding of the challenge to the cleaning process is important. The relationship among device material, test soil, and application method was investigated by testing 140 variable combinations, including seven materials (stainless steel, polyoxymethylene, polyether ether ketone, nitinol, aluminum, titanium, and silicone), four test soils (defibrinated blood soil, coagulated blood, modified coagulated blood, and Miles soil), and five soil application methods (pipetting neat, pipetting spreader, painting, handling with soiled gloves, and immersion). Stainless steel was the only material that showed consistent soil application in a thickness (at ~6 μL/cm<sup>2</sup>) that fully covered the test surface without some element of pooling, cracking, flaking, or soil migration with all test soils and application methods. The data collected using solubility testing indicated that a complex relationship for material adherence may exist between device materials and test soil. Stainless steel was the most challenging material tested.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology\",\"volume\":\"57 4\",\"pages\":\"136-142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10764060/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2345/0899-8205-57.4.136\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2345/0899-8205-57.4.136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在为可重复使用医疗器械的清洁验证选择测试变量时,制造商必须为设备提供模拟的、具有临床代表性的挑战。在确定适当的挑战时必须小心谨慎,以免因选择每个变量的最坏情况而过度挑战清洁过程,从而导致不可能的验证或不切实际的处理要求。要适当选择测试变量,就必须了解清洗过程所面临的挑战。通过测试 140 种变量组合,包括七种材料(不锈钢、聚甲醛、聚醚醚酮、镍钛诺、铝、钛和硅)、四种测试土壤(去纤维血土、凝固血土、改良凝固血土和万里土)和五种土壤应用方法(移液器、移液器扩张器、喷漆、戴脏手套处理和浸泡),研究了设备材料、测试土壤和应用方法之间的关系。在所有测试土壤和施用方法中,不锈钢是唯一一种施用厚度(约 6 μL/cm2)完全覆盖测试表面且没有出现积水、开裂、剥落或土壤迁移现象的材料。溶解度测试收集的数据表明,设备材料和测试土壤之间可能存在复杂的材料附着关系。不锈钢是测试中最具挑战性的材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Test Soil and Material Affinity for Reusable Device Cleaning Validations.

While selecting the test variables for a cleaning validation for reusable medical devices, the manufacturer must provide a simulative and clinically representative challenge for the device. An appropriate challenge must be identified with care so as not to overchallenge the cleaning process by selecting the worst case for every variable, thus leading to an impossible validation or unrealistic processing requirements. To appropriately select the testing variables, an understanding of the challenge to the cleaning process is important. The relationship among device material, test soil, and application method was investigated by testing 140 variable combinations, including seven materials (stainless steel, polyoxymethylene, polyether ether ketone, nitinol, aluminum, titanium, and silicone), four test soils (defibrinated blood soil, coagulated blood, modified coagulated blood, and Miles soil), and five soil application methods (pipetting neat, pipetting spreader, painting, handling with soiled gloves, and immersion). Stainless steel was the only material that showed consistent soil application in a thickness (at ~6 μL/cm2) that fully covered the test surface without some element of pooling, cracking, flaking, or soil migration with all test soils and application methods. The data collected using solubility testing indicated that a complex relationship for material adherence may exist between device materials and test soil. Stainless steel was the most challenging material tested.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology
Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: AAMI publishes Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology (BI&T) a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the developers, managers, and users of medical instrumentation and technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信