参数的力量:验证环氧乙烷灭菌参数发布的方法。

Q4 Medicine
Elise Coakley, Liliana De Alba Nunez, Abigail Honetschlager, Daniel Howell, Scott Jelley, Nicole McLees, Rosa I Vale Mercado
{"title":"参数的力量:验证环氧乙烷灭菌参数发布的方法。","authors":"Elise Coakley, Liliana De Alba Nunez, Abigail Honetschlager, Daniel Howell, Scott Jelley, Nicole McLees, Rosa I Vale Mercado","doi":"10.2345/0899-8205-57.4.129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When approaching an ethylene oxide (EO) sterilization validation, medical device manufacturers traditionally have two choices. They can use biological indicators (BIs) to monitor each production run or establish a parametric release process in which sterile release is based on the monitoring and control of physical process parameters that ensure process specifications are met. In ISO 11135:2014, parametric release was brought to the forefront as an acceptable release method; however, a perception exists that implementing parametric release is challenging and time consuming. This article will demonstrate that the opposite is true. It presents a streamlined approach in which parametric release is addressed through the various stages of validation: product definition, process definition, performance qualification, routine release, and process control. Considerations for establishing specifications directly from validation versus \"run and record\" and trending critical process parameters (e.g., relative humidity, temperature, EO concentration) are discussed. In addition, the benefits of parametric release (active monitoring) over BI release (passive monitoring), including improvements to turnaround time, process control, risk mitigation, reduction of resource investment, and elimination of microbiological release testing, are highlighted. With multiple benefits, parametric release should be the gold standard for EO sterilization processes. It is not novel and has been widely accepted by regulatory agencies globally and notified bodies. The article further describes how the data collection and process capability that is central to process control and parametric release is more powerful than the information provided by a BI, which is merely a catastrophic indicator when used in routine processing.</p>","PeriodicalId":35656,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10764058/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Power of Parametric: Methods to Validate Ethylene Oxide Sterilization Parametric Release.\",\"authors\":\"Elise Coakley, Liliana De Alba Nunez, Abigail Honetschlager, Daniel Howell, Scott Jelley, Nicole McLees, Rosa I Vale Mercado\",\"doi\":\"10.2345/0899-8205-57.4.129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>When approaching an ethylene oxide (EO) sterilization validation, medical device manufacturers traditionally have two choices. They can use biological indicators (BIs) to monitor each production run or establish a parametric release process in which sterile release is based on the monitoring and control of physical process parameters that ensure process specifications are met. In ISO 11135:2014, parametric release was brought to the forefront as an acceptable release method; however, a perception exists that implementing parametric release is challenging and time consuming. This article will demonstrate that the opposite is true. It presents a streamlined approach in which parametric release is addressed through the various stages of validation: product definition, process definition, performance qualification, routine release, and process control. Considerations for establishing specifications directly from validation versus \\\"run and record\\\" and trending critical process parameters (e.g., relative humidity, temperature, EO concentration) are discussed. In addition, the benefits of parametric release (active monitoring) over BI release (passive monitoring), including improvements to turnaround time, process control, risk mitigation, reduction of resource investment, and elimination of microbiological release testing, are highlighted. With multiple benefits, parametric release should be the gold standard for EO sterilization processes. It is not novel and has been widely accepted by regulatory agencies globally and notified bodies. The article further describes how the data collection and process capability that is central to process control and parametric release is more powerful than the information provided by a BI, which is merely a catastrophic indicator when used in routine processing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10764058/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2345/0899-8205-57.4.129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2345/0899-8205-57.4.129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在进行环氧乙烷 (EO) 灭菌验证时,医疗器械制造商通常有两种选择。他们可以使用生物指标 (BI) 来监控每个生产流程,或者建立参数释放流程,其中无菌释放基于对物理流程参数的监控,以确保符合流程规范。在 ISO 11135:2014 中,参数放行作为一种可接受的放行方法被推到了前沿;然而,人们普遍认为实施参数放行具有挑战性且耗时。本文将证明事实恰恰相反。本文将介绍一种简化的方法,通过验证的各个阶段(产品定义、工艺定义、性能鉴定、常规放行和工艺控制)来解决参数放行问题。讨论了直接从验证中确定规格与 "运行和记录 "以及关键工艺参数(如相对湿度、温度、环氧乙烷浓度)趋势的考虑因素。此外,还强调了参数放行(主动监测)相对于 BI 放行(被动监测)的好处,包括缩短周转时间、改进工艺控制、降低风险、减少资源投入和取消微生物放行测试。参数释放法具有多种优点,应成为环氧乙烷灭菌工艺的黄金标准。它并不新颖,已被全球监管机构和申报机构广泛接受。文章进一步介绍了作为过程控制和参数释放核心的数据收集和过程能力如何比生物统计学指标提供的信息更强大,后者在常规处理过程中仅仅是一个灾难性指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Power of Parametric: Methods to Validate Ethylene Oxide Sterilization Parametric Release.

When approaching an ethylene oxide (EO) sterilization validation, medical device manufacturers traditionally have two choices. They can use biological indicators (BIs) to monitor each production run or establish a parametric release process in which sterile release is based on the monitoring and control of physical process parameters that ensure process specifications are met. In ISO 11135:2014, parametric release was brought to the forefront as an acceptable release method; however, a perception exists that implementing parametric release is challenging and time consuming. This article will demonstrate that the opposite is true. It presents a streamlined approach in which parametric release is addressed through the various stages of validation: product definition, process definition, performance qualification, routine release, and process control. Considerations for establishing specifications directly from validation versus "run and record" and trending critical process parameters (e.g., relative humidity, temperature, EO concentration) are discussed. In addition, the benefits of parametric release (active monitoring) over BI release (passive monitoring), including improvements to turnaround time, process control, risk mitigation, reduction of resource investment, and elimination of microbiological release testing, are highlighted. With multiple benefits, parametric release should be the gold standard for EO sterilization processes. It is not novel and has been widely accepted by regulatory agencies globally and notified bodies. The article further describes how the data collection and process capability that is central to process control and parametric release is more powerful than the information provided by a BI, which is merely a catastrophic indicator when used in routine processing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology
Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: AAMI publishes Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology (BI&T) a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the developers, managers, and users of medical instrumentation and technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信