非甾体类抗炎药物的使用取决于轴性SpA的疾病活动,而生物制剂会减少非甾体类抗炎药物的使用:一项纵向分析。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
ARP Rheumatology Pub Date : 2023-10-01
Elif Durak Ediboğlu, Dilek Solmaz, Gökhan Kabadayı, Sercan Gücenmez, Haluk Cinakli, Eda Otman Akat, Mustafa Özmen, Servet Akar
{"title":"非甾体类抗炎药物的使用取决于轴性SpA的疾病活动,而生物制剂会减少非甾体类抗炎药物的使用:一项纵向分析。","authors":"Elif Durak Ediboğlu, Dilek Solmaz, Gökhan Kabadayı, Sercan Gücenmez, Haluk Cinakli, Eda Otman Akat, Mustafa Özmen, Servet Akar","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use and Assessment in Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS)-NSAID scores in patients with axial spondyloarhritis (axSpA) in a longitudinal study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 429 patients with axSpA (59% male; 63.6% with AS) were included in this study. Data about disease activity, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, and NSAID use and dosage were collected at 0, 12, 24, and 52 weeks retrospectively. The relationship with NSAID use /ASAS-NSAID scores and other factors were tested using generalized estimating equations (GEE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline (0 weeks), 92.8% of patients in biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) group and 82.1% of patients in conventional treatment group were treated with NSAIDs. At baseline, the proportion (p=0.03) and the median (IQR) ASAS-NSAID scores were higher in bDMARDs group [100 (50) vs 50 (83.4); p<0.001]. During follow-up, NSAID use and ASAS-NSAID scores decreased significantly in patients treated with bDMARDs (p<0.001) and the reduction remained stable throughout the follow-up However, neither NSAID use (p=0.06) nor ASAS-NSAID scores changed in conventional treatment group (p=0.15). In bDMARD-treated patients, ASDAS-CRP and BASFI scores were independent determinants for NSAID use, and BASDAI and PGA were determinants for NSAID dosage. There was no independent significant predictor for ASAS-NSAID scores; PGA was the only significant predictor for NSAID use in the conventional treatment group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Concurrent biologic treatment was associated with low NSAID intake in patients with axSpA, and NSAID use was determined mainly by disease activity and partly by function during bDMARD treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":29669,"journal":{"name":"ARP Rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use is determined by disease activity in axSpA and decreased by biologicals: a longitudinal analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Elif Durak Ediboğlu, Dilek Solmaz, Gökhan Kabadayı, Sercan Gücenmez, Haluk Cinakli, Eda Otman Akat, Mustafa Özmen, Servet Akar\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use and Assessment in Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS)-NSAID scores in patients with axial spondyloarhritis (axSpA) in a longitudinal study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 429 patients with axSpA (59% male; 63.6% with AS) were included in this study. Data about disease activity, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, and NSAID use and dosage were collected at 0, 12, 24, and 52 weeks retrospectively. The relationship with NSAID use /ASAS-NSAID scores and other factors were tested using generalized estimating equations (GEE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline (0 weeks), 92.8% of patients in biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) group and 82.1% of patients in conventional treatment group were treated with NSAIDs. At baseline, the proportion (p=0.03) and the median (IQR) ASAS-NSAID scores were higher in bDMARDs group [100 (50) vs 50 (83.4); p<0.001]. During follow-up, NSAID use and ASAS-NSAID scores decreased significantly in patients treated with bDMARDs (p<0.001) and the reduction remained stable throughout the follow-up However, neither NSAID use (p=0.06) nor ASAS-NSAID scores changed in conventional treatment group (p=0.15). In bDMARD-treated patients, ASDAS-CRP and BASFI scores were independent determinants for NSAID use, and BASDAI and PGA were determinants for NSAID dosage. There was no independent significant predictor for ASAS-NSAID scores; PGA was the only significant predictor for NSAID use in the conventional treatment group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Concurrent biologic treatment was associated with low NSAID intake in patients with axSpA, and NSAID use was determined mainly by disease activity and partly by function during bDMARD treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARP Rheumatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARP Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARP Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在一项纵向研究中评估轴性脊柱关节炎(axSpA)患者非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)的使用情况和脊柱关节炎国际协会(ASAS)-NSAID评分:本研究共纳入 429 名 axSpA 患者(59% 为男性;63.6% 患有强直性脊柱炎)。在0周、12周、24周和52周时回顾性地收集了有关疾病活动度、C反应蛋白(CRP)水平、非甾体抗炎药使用情况和剂量的数据。使用广义估计方程(GEE)检验了非甾体抗炎药使用/ASAS-NSAID评分与其他因素的关系:基线(0 周)时,92.8% 的生物改善病情抗风湿药(bDMARDs)组患者和 82.1% 的常规治疗组患者接受了非甾体抗炎药治疗。基线时,bDMARDs 组患者的 ASAS-NSAID 评分比例(p=0.03)和中位数(IQR)均较高[100 (50) vs 50 (83.4); p结论:同时接受生物制剂治疗与 axSpA 患者非甾体抗炎药摄入量低有关,非甾体抗炎药的使用主要取决于疾病活动,部分取决于 bDMARDs 治疗期间的功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use is determined by disease activity in axSpA and decreased by biologicals: a longitudinal analysis.

Objective: To evaluate non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use and Assessment in Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS)-NSAID scores in patients with axial spondyloarhritis (axSpA) in a longitudinal study.

Methods: In total, 429 patients with axSpA (59% male; 63.6% with AS) were included in this study. Data about disease activity, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, and NSAID use and dosage were collected at 0, 12, 24, and 52 weeks retrospectively. The relationship with NSAID use /ASAS-NSAID scores and other factors were tested using generalized estimating equations (GEE).

Results: At baseline (0 weeks), 92.8% of patients in biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) group and 82.1% of patients in conventional treatment group were treated with NSAIDs. At baseline, the proportion (p=0.03) and the median (IQR) ASAS-NSAID scores were higher in bDMARDs group [100 (50) vs 50 (83.4); p<0.001]. During follow-up, NSAID use and ASAS-NSAID scores decreased significantly in patients treated with bDMARDs (p<0.001) and the reduction remained stable throughout the follow-up However, neither NSAID use (p=0.06) nor ASAS-NSAID scores changed in conventional treatment group (p=0.15). In bDMARD-treated patients, ASDAS-CRP and BASFI scores were independent determinants for NSAID use, and BASDAI and PGA were determinants for NSAID dosage. There was no independent significant predictor for ASAS-NSAID scores; PGA was the only significant predictor for NSAID use in the conventional treatment group.

Conclusion: Concurrent biologic treatment was associated with low NSAID intake in patients with axSpA, and NSAID use was determined mainly by disease activity and partly by function during bDMARD treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信