FLOW:血液透析血管通路流动功能障碍:关于动静脉瘘和移植物监测有效性的随机对照试验。

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Journal of Vascular Access Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-02 DOI:10.1177/11297298231212754
Bianca Zomer, Matthijs S Ruiter, Friedo W Dekker, Ellen Gd Goertz, Michiel W de Haan, Marc Hh Hemmelder, Mickaël Jc Hiligsmann, Wanda S Konijn, Magda M van Loon, José Mc Maessen, Barend Me Mees, Joris I Rotmans, Geert Wh Schurink, Marie-José Jpj Vleugels, Maarten Gj Snoeijs
{"title":"FLOW:血液透析血管通路流动功能障碍:关于动静脉瘘和移植物监测有效性的随机对照试验。","authors":"Bianca Zomer, Matthijs S Ruiter, Friedo W Dekker, Ellen Gd Goertz, Michiel W de Haan, Marc Hh Hemmelder, Mickaël Jc Hiligsmann, Wanda S Konijn, Magda M van Loon, José Mc Maessen, Barend Me Mees, Joris I Rotmans, Geert Wh Schurink, Marie-José Jpj Vleugels, Maarten Gj Snoeijs","doi":"10.1177/11297298231212754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>It is assumed that identification and correction of asymptomatic stenoses in the vascular access circuit will prevent thrombosis that would require urgent intervention to continue hemodialysis treatment. However, the evidence base for this assumption is limited. Recent international clinical practice guidelines reach different conclusions on the use of surveillance for vascular access flow dysfunction and recommend further research to inform clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The FLOW trial is a double-blind, multicenter, randomized controlled trial with a 1:1 individual participant treatment allocation ratio over two study arms. In the intervention group, only symptomatic vascular access stenoses detected by clinical monitoring are treated, whereas in the comparison group asymptomatic stenoses detected by surveillance using monthly dilution flow measurements are treated as well. Hemodialysis patients with a functional arteriovenous vascular access are enrolled. The primary outcome is the access-related intervention rate that will be analyzed using a general linear model with Poisson distribution. Secondary outcomes include patient satisfaction, access-related serious adverse events, and quality of the surveillance process. A cost effectiveness analysis and budget impact analysis will also be conducted. The study requires 828 patient-years of follow-up in 417 participants to detect a difference of 0.25 access-related interventions per year between study groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>As one of the largest randomized controlled trials assessing the clinical impact of vascular access surveillance using a strong double-blinded study design, we believe the FLOW trial will provide much-needed evidence to improve vascular access care for hemodialysis patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"2007-2017"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FLOW: Flow dysfunction of hemodialysis vascular access: A randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of surveillance of arteriovenous fistulas and grafts.\",\"authors\":\"Bianca Zomer, Matthijs S Ruiter, Friedo W Dekker, Ellen Gd Goertz, Michiel W de Haan, Marc Hh Hemmelder, Mickaël Jc Hiligsmann, Wanda S Konijn, Magda M van Loon, José Mc Maessen, Barend Me Mees, Joris I Rotmans, Geert Wh Schurink, Marie-José Jpj Vleugels, Maarten Gj Snoeijs\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11297298231212754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>It is assumed that identification and correction of asymptomatic stenoses in the vascular access circuit will prevent thrombosis that would require urgent intervention to continue hemodialysis treatment. However, the evidence base for this assumption is limited. Recent international clinical practice guidelines reach different conclusions on the use of surveillance for vascular access flow dysfunction and recommend further research to inform clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The FLOW trial is a double-blind, multicenter, randomized controlled trial with a 1:1 individual participant treatment allocation ratio over two study arms. In the intervention group, only symptomatic vascular access stenoses detected by clinical monitoring are treated, whereas in the comparison group asymptomatic stenoses detected by surveillance using monthly dilution flow measurements are treated as well. Hemodialysis patients with a functional arteriovenous vascular access are enrolled. The primary outcome is the access-related intervention rate that will be analyzed using a general linear model with Poisson distribution. Secondary outcomes include patient satisfaction, access-related serious adverse events, and quality of the surveillance process. A cost effectiveness analysis and budget impact analysis will also be conducted. The study requires 828 patient-years of follow-up in 417 participants to detect a difference of 0.25 access-related interventions per year between study groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>As one of the largest randomized controlled trials assessing the clinical impact of vascular access surveillance using a strong double-blinded study design, we believe the FLOW trial will provide much-needed evidence to improve vascular access care for hemodialysis patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2007-2017\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298231212754\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298231212754","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:人们认为,识别并纠正血管通路中无症状的狭窄可防止血栓形成,而血栓形成则需要紧急干预才能继续进行血液透析治疗。然而,这一假设的证据基础十分有限。最近的国际临床实践指南对使用血管通路血流功能障碍监测得出了不同的结论,并建议开展进一步研究,为临床实践提供依据:FLOW 试验是一项双盲、多中心、随机对照试验,两个研究臂的个体参与者治疗分配比例为 1:1。在干预组中,只有通过临床监测发现的无症状血管通路狭窄才会得到治疗,而在对比组中,通过每月稀释流量测量监测发现的无症状血管通路狭窄也会得到治疗。具有功能性动静脉血管通路的血液透析患者也在研究范围内。主要结果是与通路相关的干预率,将采用泊松分布的一般线性模型进行分析。次要结果包括患者满意度、与通路相关的严重不良事件以及监控过程的质量。此外,还将进行成本效益分析和预算影响分析。该研究需要对 417 名参与者进行 828 个患者年的随访,才能检测出研究组之间每年 0.25 次与就医相关干预的差异:作为采用双盲研究设计评估血管通路监测临床影响的最大随机对照试验之一,我们相信 FLOW 试验将为改善血液透析患者的血管通路护理提供急需的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FLOW: Flow dysfunction of hemodialysis vascular access: A randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of surveillance of arteriovenous fistulas and grafts.

Introduction: It is assumed that identification and correction of asymptomatic stenoses in the vascular access circuit will prevent thrombosis that would require urgent intervention to continue hemodialysis treatment. However, the evidence base for this assumption is limited. Recent international clinical practice guidelines reach different conclusions on the use of surveillance for vascular access flow dysfunction and recommend further research to inform clinical practice.

Methods: The FLOW trial is a double-blind, multicenter, randomized controlled trial with a 1:1 individual participant treatment allocation ratio over two study arms. In the intervention group, only symptomatic vascular access stenoses detected by clinical monitoring are treated, whereas in the comparison group asymptomatic stenoses detected by surveillance using monthly dilution flow measurements are treated as well. Hemodialysis patients with a functional arteriovenous vascular access are enrolled. The primary outcome is the access-related intervention rate that will be analyzed using a general linear model with Poisson distribution. Secondary outcomes include patient satisfaction, access-related serious adverse events, and quality of the surveillance process. A cost effectiveness analysis and budget impact analysis will also be conducted. The study requires 828 patient-years of follow-up in 417 participants to detect a difference of 0.25 access-related interventions per year between study groups.

Discussion: As one of the largest randomized controlled trials assessing the clinical impact of vascular access surveillance using a strong double-blinded study design, we believe the FLOW trial will provide much-needed evidence to improve vascular access care for hemodialysis patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信