探索精读课文中的频率轮廓

IF 2 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Heidi Anne E. Mesmer
{"title":"探索精读课文中的频率轮廓","authors":"Heidi Anne E. Mesmer","doi":"10.1007/s11145-023-10493-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many initiatives have emphasized the importance of challenging students in text using readability formulas. Almost all formulas employ mean word frequency yet long-standing issues abound. Researchers question using a singular mean with a skewed variable like frequency. They also question the degree to which frequency pinpoints complex words, noting that infrequent words can be rare, but not rich (e.g., smock). Unfortunately, no studies have examined how often this phenomenon occurs. In fact, word frequency is a “black box” because we do not know the <i>actual</i> words represented at different frequency points. This study used a new frequency metric to analyze 249 texts designed for close reading. Texts averaged 640 words and were written for Grades 2–8. For each text, curves were compared by grade and type. Words at each point on the curve were identified and analyzed. Findings illustrated the curves of word frequency throughout a text and unpacked the actual words at different points along the curves. Regardless of grade or type, curves were nearly identical in shape. Curves were characterized by four frequency strata. At the lowest frequency level were the rich, rare words that advance learning. However, analyses showed that between 34 and 72% of the time these least frequent words were rare but not rich, a pattern that occurred more frequently in narrative texts. Findings also showed that narratives were characterized by one very rare word that could influence the mean word frequency. The study included a series of graphics illustrating the functions of words at different tiers and listing the words along the curves.</p>","PeriodicalId":48204,"journal":{"name":"Reading and Writing","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the frequency contours in close reading texts\",\"authors\":\"Heidi Anne E. Mesmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11145-023-10493-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Many initiatives have emphasized the importance of challenging students in text using readability formulas. Almost all formulas employ mean word frequency yet long-standing issues abound. Researchers question using a singular mean with a skewed variable like frequency. They also question the degree to which frequency pinpoints complex words, noting that infrequent words can be rare, but not rich (e.g., smock). Unfortunately, no studies have examined how often this phenomenon occurs. In fact, word frequency is a “black box” because we do not know the <i>actual</i> words represented at different frequency points. This study used a new frequency metric to analyze 249 texts designed for close reading. Texts averaged 640 words and were written for Grades 2–8. For each text, curves were compared by grade and type. Words at each point on the curve were identified and analyzed. Findings illustrated the curves of word frequency throughout a text and unpacked the actual words at different points along the curves. Regardless of grade or type, curves were nearly identical in shape. Curves were characterized by four frequency strata. At the lowest frequency level were the rich, rare words that advance learning. However, analyses showed that between 34 and 72% of the time these least frequent words were rare but not rich, a pattern that occurred more frequently in narrative texts. Findings also showed that narratives were characterized by one very rare word that could influence the mean word frequency. The study included a series of graphics illustrating the functions of words at different tiers and listing the words along the curves.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reading and Writing\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reading and Writing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-023-10493-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading and Writing","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-023-10493-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多倡议都强调了在课文中使用可读性公式向学生提出挑战的重要性。几乎所有的公式都采用平均词频,但长期以来问题重重。研究人员对使用单数平均值和词频这样的倾斜变量提出了质疑。他们还质疑词频对复杂词的定位程度,指出不常见的词可能是罕见的,但并不丰富(如 smock)。遗憾的是,还没有研究探讨过这种现象发生的频率。事实上,词频是一个 "黑箱",因为我们不知道不同频率点所代表的实际词语。本研究使用了一种新的词频指标来分析 249 篇为精读而设计的文章。这些课文平均字数为 640 个,适用于二年级至八年级。对于每篇课文,按年级和类型进行曲线比较。对曲线上每个点的单词进行了识别和分析。研究结果表明了整篇文章的词频曲线,并揭示了曲线上不同点的实际词语。无论年级或类型如何,曲线的形状几乎相同。曲线有四个词频层。频率最低的是内容丰富、罕见的单词,这些单词能促进学习。然而,分析表明,在 34% 到 72% 的时间里,这些出现频率最低的词语是罕见的,但并不丰富,这种模式在记叙文中出现的频率更高。研究结果还显示,叙事文中有一个非常罕见的词,可能会影响平均词频。该研究包括一系列图表,说明了不同层级词语的功能,并沿着曲线列出了词语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Exploring the frequency contours in close reading texts

Exploring the frequency contours in close reading texts

Many initiatives have emphasized the importance of challenging students in text using readability formulas. Almost all formulas employ mean word frequency yet long-standing issues abound. Researchers question using a singular mean with a skewed variable like frequency. They also question the degree to which frequency pinpoints complex words, noting that infrequent words can be rare, but not rich (e.g., smock). Unfortunately, no studies have examined how often this phenomenon occurs. In fact, word frequency is a “black box” because we do not know the actual words represented at different frequency points. This study used a new frequency metric to analyze 249 texts designed for close reading. Texts averaged 640 words and were written for Grades 2–8. For each text, curves were compared by grade and type. Words at each point on the curve were identified and analyzed. Findings illustrated the curves of word frequency throughout a text and unpacked the actual words at different points along the curves. Regardless of grade or type, curves were nearly identical in shape. Curves were characterized by four frequency strata. At the lowest frequency level were the rich, rare words that advance learning. However, analyses showed that between 34 and 72% of the time these least frequent words were rare but not rich, a pattern that occurred more frequently in narrative texts. Findings also showed that narratives were characterized by one very rare word that could influence the mean word frequency. The study included a series of graphics illustrating the functions of words at different tiers and listing the words along the curves.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
16.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Reading and writing skills are fundamental to literacy. Consequently, the processes involved in reading and writing and the failure to acquire these skills, as well as the loss of once well-developed reading and writing abilities have been the targets of intense research activity involving professionals from a variety of disciplines, such as neuropsychology, cognitive psychology, psycholinguistics and education. The findings that have emanated from this research are most often written up in a lingua that is specific to the particular discipline involved, and are published in specialized journals. This generally leaves the expert in one area almost totally unaware of what may be taking place in any area other than their own. Reading and Writing cuts through this fog of jargon, breaking down the artificial boundaries between disciplines. The journal focuses on the interaction among various fields, such as linguistics, information processing, neuropsychology, cognitive psychology, speech and hearing science and education. Reading and Writing publishes high-quality, scientific articles pertaining to the processes, acquisition, and loss of reading and writing skills. The journal fully represents the necessarily interdisciplinary nature of research in the field, focusing on the interaction among various disciplines, such as linguistics, information processing, neuropsychology, cognitive psychology, speech and hearing science and education. Coverage in Reading and Writing includes models of reading, writing and spelling at all age levels; orthography and its relation to reading and writing; computer literacy; cross-cultural studies; and developmental and acquired disorders of reading and writing. It publishes research articles, critical reviews, theoretical papers, and case studies. Reading and Writing is one of the most highly cited journals in Education, Educational Research, and Educational Psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信