使用 t-Branch 现成多分支内植物治疗胸腹主动脉瘤的短期和中期疗效的系统性回顾和 Meta 分析。

IF 1.5 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Journal of Endovascular Therapy Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-29 DOI:10.1177/15266028231220322
Yonghui Chen, Zongwei Liu, Shuaishuai Wang, Mario D'Oria, Xiaoxing Zhang, Jiaxue Bi, Dongsheng Cui, Xiangchen Dai
{"title":"使用 t-Branch 现成多分支内植物治疗胸腹主动脉瘤的短期和中期疗效的系统性回顾和 Meta 分析。","authors":"Yonghui Chen, Zongwei Liu, Shuaishuai Wang, Mario D'Oria, Xiaoxing Zhang, Jiaxue Bi, Dongsheng Cui, Xiangchen Dai","doi":"10.1177/15266028231220322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a meta-analysis to assess the safety and efficacy of t-Branch off-the-shelf multibranched endograft for the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>Online databases were searched from June 2012 to March 2023. The data were pooled together using a random-effects model of proportions. The outcomes overall included technical success, spinal cord ischemia, target vessel occlusion, type I or III endoleak, reintervention, early mortality (30-day), and mid-term outcomes. Subgroup meta-analyses and meta-regression were performed to explore variation among studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15 studies containing 1238 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The overall study quality assessment was found to be moderate to good. The pooled technical success was 97.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]=95.5-98.6, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>=53.01%, 1185/1238 cases, 15 studies). Overall, early mortality was 7.3% (95% CI=4.4-10.1, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>=74.48%, 124/1238 cases, 15 studies). Early spinal cord ischemia was 13.4% (95% CI=9.6-17.2, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup><i>=</i>67.24%, 160/1238 cases, 15 studies), and early type I or III endoleak was 6.0% (95% CI=3.4-8.5, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>=53.71%, 68/1032 cases, 9 studies). Mid-term outcomes showed target vessel occlusion was 4% (95% CI=1.4-6.5, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>=65.18%, 28/528 cases, 10 studies, 5-21.2 months), type I or III endoleak was 4.7% (95% CI=2-7.5, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>=49.74%, 38/512 cases, 10 studies, 5-21.2 months), reintervention was 11.2% (95% CI=8.1-14.3, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>=31.06%, 85/650 cases, 10 studies, 5-21.2 months), and pooled mortality was 13.9% (95% CI=7.2-20.7, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup><i>=</i>76.32%, 84/550 cases, 11 studies, 5-21.2 months). Meta-regression found a significant linear association between higher technical success and earlier publication year (p=0.014) and studies with anatomic inclusion criteria (p=0.037). Urgent patients (p=0.021) and later publication year (p=0.048) were significantly associated with higher early mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of the off-the-shelf t-Branch multibranched endograft for elective or urgent endovascular TAAA repair is associated with high technical success rates and proved to be safe and effective at early and mid-term follow-up. However, the heterogeneity between the included studies is high, and prospective, randomized studies along with future larger studies with long-term follow-up are needed.Clinical ImpactThe Zenith t-Branch (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind) was approved as a commercially available device in Europe in June 2012. Although a decade has past, the outcomes of t-Branch have rarely been synthesized at the global level. This meta-analysis included 15 studies containing 1238 patients. The meta-analyses included technical success, major adverse events, reintervention, early mortality, and mid-term outcomes. The outcome was very meaningful and representative for the use of t-Branch. It is helpful for endovascular surgeons to make decisions on the treatment of TAAA patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1360-1373"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Short-term and Mid-term Outcomes After Use of t-Branch Off-the-shelf Multibranched Endograft for Elective and Urgent Treatment of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms.\",\"authors\":\"Yonghui Chen, Zongwei Liu, Shuaishuai Wang, Mario D'Oria, Xiaoxing Zhang, Jiaxue Bi, Dongsheng Cui, Xiangchen Dai\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15266028231220322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a meta-analysis to assess the safety and efficacy of t-Branch off-the-shelf multibranched endograft for the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>Online databases were searched from June 2012 to March 2023. The data were pooled together using a random-effects model of proportions. The outcomes overall included technical success, spinal cord ischemia, target vessel occlusion, type I or III endoleak, reintervention, early mortality (30-day), and mid-term outcomes. Subgroup meta-analyses and meta-regression were performed to explore variation among studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15 studies containing 1238 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The overall study quality assessment was found to be moderate to good. The pooled technical success was 97.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]=95.5-98.6, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>=53.01%, 1185/1238 cases, 15 studies). Overall, early mortality was 7.3% (95% CI=4.4-10.1, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>=74.48%, 124/1238 cases, 15 studies). Early spinal cord ischemia was 13.4% (95% CI=9.6-17.2, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup><i>=</i>67.24%, 160/1238 cases, 15 studies), and early type I or III endoleak was 6.0% (95% CI=3.4-8.5, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>=53.71%, 68/1032 cases, 9 studies). Mid-term outcomes showed target vessel occlusion was 4% (95% CI=1.4-6.5, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>=65.18%, 28/528 cases, 10 studies, 5-21.2 months), type I or III endoleak was 4.7% (95% CI=2-7.5, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>=49.74%, 38/512 cases, 10 studies, 5-21.2 months), reintervention was 11.2% (95% CI=8.1-14.3, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>=31.06%, 85/650 cases, 10 studies, 5-21.2 months), and pooled mortality was 13.9% (95% CI=7.2-20.7, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup><i>=</i>76.32%, 84/550 cases, 11 studies, 5-21.2 months). Meta-regression found a significant linear association between higher technical success and earlier publication year (p=0.014) and studies with anatomic inclusion criteria (p=0.037). Urgent patients (p=0.021) and later publication year (p=0.048) were significantly associated with higher early mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of the off-the-shelf t-Branch multibranched endograft for elective or urgent endovascular TAAA repair is associated with high technical success rates and proved to be safe and effective at early and mid-term follow-up. However, the heterogeneity between the included studies is high, and prospective, randomized studies along with future larger studies with long-term follow-up are needed.Clinical ImpactThe Zenith t-Branch (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind) was approved as a commercially available device in Europe in June 2012. Although a decade has past, the outcomes of t-Branch have rarely been synthesized at the global level. This meta-analysis included 15 studies containing 1238 patients. The meta-analyses included technical success, major adverse events, reintervention, early mortality, and mid-term outcomes. The outcome was very meaningful and representative for the use of t-Branch. It is helpful for endovascular surgeons to make decisions on the treatment of TAAA patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Endovascular Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1360-1373\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Endovascular Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028231220322\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028231220322","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的进行一项荟萃分析,评估t-Branch现成多分支内植物治疗胸腹主动脉瘤(TAAA)的安全性和有效性:PubMed、Embase和Web of Science:综述方法:检索了2012年6月至2023年3月的在线数据库。采用随机效应比例模型对数据进行汇总。总体结果包括技术成功率、脊髓缺血、靶血管闭塞、I型或III型内漏、再介入、早期死亡率(30天)和中期结果。研究人员进行了分组荟萃分析和荟萃回归,以探讨不同研究之间的差异:荟萃分析共纳入了 15 项研究,包含 1238 名患者。研究的总体质量评估为中等至良好。汇总的技术成功率为97.0%(95%置信区间[CI]=95.5-98.6,I2=53.01%,1185/1238例,15项研究)。总体而言,早期死亡率为7.3%(95% CI=4.4-10.1,I2=74.48%,124/1238例,15项研究)。早期脊髓缺血为13.4%(95% CI=9.6-17.2,I2=67.24%,160/1238例,15项研究),早期I型或III型内漏为6.0%(95% CI=3.4-8.5,I2=53.71%,68/1032例,9项研究)。中期结果显示,靶血管闭塞为4%(95% CI=1.4-6.5,I2=65.18%,28/528例,10项研究,5-21.2个月),I型或III型内漏为4.7%(95% CI=2-7.5,I2=49.74%,38/512例,10项研究,5-21.2个月),再次介入为4.7%(95% CI=2-7.5,I2=49.74%,38/512例,10项研究,5-21.2个月)。2个月),再介入率为11.2%(95% CI=8.1-14.3,I2=31.06%,85/650例,10项研究,5-21.2个月),汇总死亡率为13.9%(95% CI=7.2-20.7,I2=76.32%,84/550例,11项研究,5-21.2个月)。元回归发现,较高的技术成功率与较早的发表年份(p=0.014)和具有解剖学纳入标准的研究(p=0.037)之间存在显著的线性关系。急诊病人(p=0.021)和较晚的发表年份(p=0.048)与较高的早期死亡率显著相关:结论:使用现成的t-Branch多分支内移植物进行择期或紧急血管内TAAA修复术具有较高的技术成功率,并且在早期和中期随访中被证明是安全有效的。然而,所纳入研究之间的异质性很高,因此需要进行前瞻性随机研究以及未来更大规模的长期随访研究:Zenith t-Branch(Cook Medical,Bloomington,Ind)于 2012 年 6 月在欧洲获批成为商用设备。虽然已经过去了十年,但全球范围内很少对 t-Branch 的结果进行综合分析。这项荟萃分析包括 15 项研究,涉及 1238 名患者。荟萃分析包括技术成功率、主要不良事件、再介入、早期死亡率和中期结果。结果对使用 t-Branch 非常有意义,也很有代表性。它有助于血管内外科医生做出治疗 TAAA 患者的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Short-term and Mid-term Outcomes After Use of t-Branch Off-the-shelf Multibranched Endograft for Elective and Urgent Treatment of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Objective: To conduct a meta-analysis to assess the safety and efficacy of t-Branch off-the-shelf multibranched endograft for the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA).

Data sources: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science.

Review methods: Online databases were searched from June 2012 to March 2023. The data were pooled together using a random-effects model of proportions. The outcomes overall included technical success, spinal cord ischemia, target vessel occlusion, type I or III endoleak, reintervention, early mortality (30-day), and mid-term outcomes. Subgroup meta-analyses and meta-regression were performed to explore variation among studies.

Results: A total of 15 studies containing 1238 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The overall study quality assessment was found to be moderate to good. The pooled technical success was 97.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]=95.5-98.6, I2=53.01%, 1185/1238 cases, 15 studies). Overall, early mortality was 7.3% (95% CI=4.4-10.1, I2=74.48%, 124/1238 cases, 15 studies). Early spinal cord ischemia was 13.4% (95% CI=9.6-17.2, I2=67.24%, 160/1238 cases, 15 studies), and early type I or III endoleak was 6.0% (95% CI=3.4-8.5, I2=53.71%, 68/1032 cases, 9 studies). Mid-term outcomes showed target vessel occlusion was 4% (95% CI=1.4-6.5, I2=65.18%, 28/528 cases, 10 studies, 5-21.2 months), type I or III endoleak was 4.7% (95% CI=2-7.5, I2=49.74%, 38/512 cases, 10 studies, 5-21.2 months), reintervention was 11.2% (95% CI=8.1-14.3, I2=31.06%, 85/650 cases, 10 studies, 5-21.2 months), and pooled mortality was 13.9% (95% CI=7.2-20.7, I2=76.32%, 84/550 cases, 11 studies, 5-21.2 months). Meta-regression found a significant linear association between higher technical success and earlier publication year (p=0.014) and studies with anatomic inclusion criteria (p=0.037). Urgent patients (p=0.021) and later publication year (p=0.048) were significantly associated with higher early mortality.

Conclusion: The use of the off-the-shelf t-Branch multibranched endograft for elective or urgent endovascular TAAA repair is associated with high technical success rates and proved to be safe and effective at early and mid-term follow-up. However, the heterogeneity between the included studies is high, and prospective, randomized studies along with future larger studies with long-term follow-up are needed.Clinical ImpactThe Zenith t-Branch (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind) was approved as a commercially available device in Europe in June 2012. Although a decade has past, the outcomes of t-Branch have rarely been synthesized at the global level. This meta-analysis included 15 studies containing 1238 patients. The meta-analyses included technical success, major adverse events, reintervention, early mortality, and mid-term outcomes. The outcome was very meaningful and representative for the use of t-Branch. It is helpful for endovascular surgeons to make decisions on the treatment of TAAA patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信