确定生育对照组和不明原因的反复种植失败妇女种植围孕期子宫和外周血自然杀伤细胞的临界值。

Q2 Medicine
Neeta Singh, Yogita Dogra, Pawan Kumar, Sandeep Mathur, Ashok Sharma, Garima Patel
{"title":"确定生育对照组和不明原因的反复种植失败妇女种植围孕期子宫和外周血自然杀伤细胞的临界值。","authors":"Neeta Singh, Yogita Dogra, Pawan Kumar, Sandeep Mathur, Ashok Sharma, Garima Patel","doi":"10.18502/jri.v24i4.14152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of the study was to determine the cut-off values for peripheral and uterine natural killer (pNK, uNK) cells in fertile controls and in women with recurrent implantation failure (RIF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, 50 women with RIF and 50 fertile controls were enrolled. Midluteal endometrial biopsy samples from both cases and controls were obtained for CD 56+ cell immunohistochemistry labeling to identify uNK cells. Peripheral venous blood was also taken during the biopsy to detect pNK cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells using flow cytometry. Cut-off values were obtained from fertile controls. Using a non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-test, the medians of the data sets were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median values for uNK and pNK cell levels in the control group were 7% and 11.6%, respectively. The median value for uNK cells in RIF patients was 9%, which was higher than the one in controls but not statistically significant (p-value of 0.689). The median pNK levels (11.6% <i>vs</i>. 12.4%) were comparable between the RIF group and the controls. Moreover, it was found that 68% of individuals had uNK cell counts below the reference value, while 32% had excessive levels exceeding 7%. Additionally, only 51.4% of the RIF group had increased pNK cells.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pNK cell cut-off values need to be used with caution because there was no difference between fertile controls and RIF women. If immunotherapy is recommended for RIF women, uNK cell testing should be used as the preferred approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":38826,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Reproduction and Infertility","volume":"24 4","pages":"248-256"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10757687/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishment of Cut-off Values for Uterine and Peripheral Blood Natural Killer Cells During the Peri-implantation Period in Fertile Controls and Women with Unexplained Recurrent Implantation Failure.\",\"authors\":\"Neeta Singh, Yogita Dogra, Pawan Kumar, Sandeep Mathur, Ashok Sharma, Garima Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/jri.v24i4.14152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of the study was to determine the cut-off values for peripheral and uterine natural killer (pNK, uNK) cells in fertile controls and in women with recurrent implantation failure (RIF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, 50 women with RIF and 50 fertile controls were enrolled. Midluteal endometrial biopsy samples from both cases and controls were obtained for CD 56+ cell immunohistochemistry labeling to identify uNK cells. Peripheral venous blood was also taken during the biopsy to detect pNK cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells using flow cytometry. Cut-off values were obtained from fertile controls. Using a non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-test, the medians of the data sets were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median values for uNK and pNK cell levels in the control group were 7% and 11.6%, respectively. The median value for uNK cells in RIF patients was 9%, which was higher than the one in controls but not statistically significant (p-value of 0.689). The median pNK levels (11.6% <i>vs</i>. 12.4%) were comparable between the RIF group and the controls. Moreover, it was found that 68% of individuals had uNK cell counts below the reference value, while 32% had excessive levels exceeding 7%. Additionally, only 51.4% of the RIF group had increased pNK cells.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pNK cell cut-off values need to be used with caution because there was no difference between fertile controls and RIF women. If immunotherapy is recommended for RIF women, uNK cell testing should be used as the preferred approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Reproduction and Infertility\",\"volume\":\"24 4\",\"pages\":\"248-256\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10757687/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Reproduction and Infertility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/jri.v24i4.14152\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Reproduction and Infertility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jri.v24i4.14152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:该研究的目的是确定可育对照组和复发性着床失败(RIF)妇女的外周和子宫自然杀伤细胞(pNK、uNK)的临界值:这项研究共纳入了 50 名 RIF 妇女和 50 名可育对照组妇女。方法:该研究选取了 50 名 RIF 妇女和 50 名可育对照组妇女,对病例和对照组妇女的黄体中段子宫内膜活检样本进行 CD 56+ 细胞免疫组化标记,以识别 uNK 细胞。活检时还抽取外周静脉血,使用流式细胞术检测外周血单核细胞中的 pNK 细胞。临界值取自可育对照组。采用非参数 Mann-Whitney U 检验法比较数据集的中位数:结果:对照组 uNK 和 pNK 细胞水平的中值分别为 7% 和 11.6%。RIF 患者的 uNK 细胞中值为 9%,高于对照组,但无统计学意义(P 值为 0.689)。RIF 组与对照组的 pNK 水平中值(11.6% 对 12.4%)相当。此外,研究还发现 68% 的人的 uNK 细胞数量低于参考值,而 32% 的人的 uNK 细胞数量过多,超过了 7%。此外,RIF 组中只有 51.4% 的人的 pNK 细胞数量有所增加:结论:pNK 细胞临界值需要谨慎使用,因为可育对照组和 RIF 妇女之间没有差异。如果建议对 RIF 妇女进行免疫治疗,则应首选 uNK 细胞检测方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Establishment of Cut-off Values for Uterine and Peripheral Blood Natural Killer Cells During the Peri-implantation Period in Fertile Controls and Women with Unexplained Recurrent Implantation Failure.

Background: The purpose of the study was to determine the cut-off values for peripheral and uterine natural killer (pNK, uNK) cells in fertile controls and in women with recurrent implantation failure (RIF).

Methods: In this study, 50 women with RIF and 50 fertile controls were enrolled. Midluteal endometrial biopsy samples from both cases and controls were obtained for CD 56+ cell immunohistochemistry labeling to identify uNK cells. Peripheral venous blood was also taken during the biopsy to detect pNK cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells using flow cytometry. Cut-off values were obtained from fertile controls. Using a non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-test, the medians of the data sets were compared.

Results: The median values for uNK and pNK cell levels in the control group were 7% and 11.6%, respectively. The median value for uNK cells in RIF patients was 9%, which was higher than the one in controls but not statistically significant (p-value of 0.689). The median pNK levels (11.6% vs. 12.4%) were comparable between the RIF group and the controls. Moreover, it was found that 68% of individuals had uNK cell counts below the reference value, while 32% had excessive levels exceeding 7%. Additionally, only 51.4% of the RIF group had increased pNK cells.

Conclusion: The pNK cell cut-off values need to be used with caution because there was no difference between fertile controls and RIF women. If immunotherapy is recommended for RIF women, uNK cell testing should be used as the preferred approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Reproduction and Infertility
Journal of Reproduction and Infertility Medicine-Reproductive Medicine
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信