密闭空间低温供气可行性:地下避难所替代方案案例研究。

0 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Lincan Yan, Dave S Yantek, Cory R DeGennaro, Justin R Srednicki, Brandin Lambie, Jacob Carr
{"title":"密闭空间低温供气可行性:地下避难所替代方案案例研究。","authors":"Lincan Yan, Dave S Yantek, Cory R DeGennaro, Justin R Srednicki, Brandin Lambie, Jacob Carr","doi":"10.1115/1.4064062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A breathable air source is required for a confined space such as an underground refuge alternative (RA) when it is occupied. To minimize the risk of suffocation, federal regulations require that mechanisms be provided and procedures be included so that, within the refuge alternative, the oxygen concentration is maintained at levels between 18.5% and 23% for 96 h. The regulation also requires that, during use of the RA, the concentration of carbon dioxide should not exceed 1%, and the concentration of carbon monoxide should not exceed 25 ppm. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) evaluated the cryogenic air supply's ability to provide breathable air for a refuge alternative. A propane smoker was used to simulate human breathing by burning propane gas which will consume O<sub>2</sub> and generate CO<sub>2</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>O. The rate of propane burned at the smoker was controlled to represent the O<sub>2</sub> consumption rate for the breathing of a certain number of people. Two 96-h tests were conducted in a sealed shipping container, which was used as a surrogate for a refuge alternative. While burning propane gas to simulate human oxygen consumption, cryogenic air was provided to the shipping container to determine if the cryogenic air supply would keep the O<sub>2</sub> level above 18.5% and CO<sub>2</sub> level below 1% inside the shipping container as required by the federal regulations pertaining to refuge alternatives. Both of the 96-h tests simulated the breathing of 21 persons. The first test used the oxygen consumption rate (1.32 cu ft of pure oxygen per hour per person) specified in federal regulations, while the second test used the oxygen consumption rate specified by (Bernard et al. 2018, \"Estimation of Metabolic Heat Input for Refuge Alternative Thermal Testing and Simulation,\" Min. Eng., <b>70</b>(8), pp. 50-54) (0.67 cu ft of pure oxygen per hour per person). The test data shows that during both 96-h tests, the oxygen level was maintained within a 21-23% range, and the CO<sub>2</sub> level was maintained below 1% (0.2-0.45%). The information in this paper could be useful when applying a cryogenic air supply as a breathable air source for an underground refuge alternative or other confined space. [DOI: 10.1115/1.4064062].</p>","PeriodicalId":510895,"journal":{"name":"ASME journal of heat and mass transfer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10755670/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cryogenic Air Supply Feasibility for a Confined Space: Underground Refuge Alternative Case Study.\",\"authors\":\"Lincan Yan, Dave S Yantek, Cory R DeGennaro, Justin R Srednicki, Brandin Lambie, Jacob Carr\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4064062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A breathable air source is required for a confined space such as an underground refuge alternative (RA) when it is occupied. To minimize the risk of suffocation, federal regulations require that mechanisms be provided and procedures be included so that, within the refuge alternative, the oxygen concentration is maintained at levels between 18.5% and 23% for 96 h. The regulation also requires that, during use of the RA, the concentration of carbon dioxide should not exceed 1%, and the concentration of carbon monoxide should not exceed 25 ppm. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) evaluated the cryogenic air supply's ability to provide breathable air for a refuge alternative. A propane smoker was used to simulate human breathing by burning propane gas which will consume O<sub>2</sub> and generate CO<sub>2</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>O. The rate of propane burned at the smoker was controlled to represent the O<sub>2</sub> consumption rate for the breathing of a certain number of people. Two 96-h tests were conducted in a sealed shipping container, which was used as a surrogate for a refuge alternative. While burning propane gas to simulate human oxygen consumption, cryogenic air was provided to the shipping container to determine if the cryogenic air supply would keep the O<sub>2</sub> level above 18.5% and CO<sub>2</sub> level below 1% inside the shipping container as required by the federal regulations pertaining to refuge alternatives. Both of the 96-h tests simulated the breathing of 21 persons. The first test used the oxygen consumption rate (1.32 cu ft of pure oxygen per hour per person) specified in federal regulations, while the second test used the oxygen consumption rate specified by (Bernard et al. 2018, \\\"Estimation of Metabolic Heat Input for Refuge Alternative Thermal Testing and Simulation,\\\" Min. Eng., <b>70</b>(8), pp. 50-54) (0.67 cu ft of pure oxygen per hour per person). The test data shows that during both 96-h tests, the oxygen level was maintained within a 21-23% range, and the CO<sub>2</sub> level was maintained below 1% (0.2-0.45%). The information in this paper could be useful when applying a cryogenic air supply as a breathable air source for an underground refuge alternative or other confined space. [DOI: 10.1115/1.4064062].</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":510895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASME journal of heat and mass transfer\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10755670/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASME journal of heat and mass transfer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4064062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASME journal of heat and mass transfer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4064062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地下避难所(RA)等密闭空间被占用时,必须有可呼吸的空气源。为了最大限度地降低窒息风险,联邦法规要求提供相应的机制和程序,以便在 96 小时内将地下避难所内的氧气浓度保持在 18.5% 至 23% 之间。美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)评估了低温供气系统为避难所替代方案提供可呼吸空气的能力。使用丙烷燃烧器模拟人的呼吸,丙烷燃烧时会消耗氧气并产生二氧化碳和水。丙烷在烟熏炉中燃烧的速度受到控制,以代表一定人数呼吸时的氧气消耗速度。在一个密封的集装箱内进行了两次 96 小时的测试,该集装箱被用作避难所的替代品。在燃烧丙烷气体模拟人体耗氧量的同时,向集装箱内提供低温空气,以确定低温空气供应是否能使集装箱内的氧气含量保持在 18.5%以上,二氧化碳含量保持在 1%以下,这符合联邦避难替代设施相关法规的要求。两次 96 小时测试都模拟了 21 人的呼吸。第一次测试使用了联邦法规规定的氧气消耗率(每人每小时 1.32 立方英尺纯氧),而第二次测试则使用了(Bernard 等人,2018 年,"避难所替代方案热测试和模拟的代谢热输入估算",Min.Eng.,70(8),第 50-54 页)(每人每小时 0.67 立方英尺纯氧)。测试数据显示,在两次 96 小时的测试中,氧气水平都保持在 21-23% 的范围内,二氧化碳水平保持在 1% 以下(0.2-0.45%)。在地下避难所或其他密闭空间应用低温供气作为可呼吸空气源时,本文中的信息可能会有所帮助。[doi: 10.1115/1.4064062].
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cryogenic Air Supply Feasibility for a Confined Space: Underground Refuge Alternative Case Study.

A breathable air source is required for a confined space such as an underground refuge alternative (RA) when it is occupied. To minimize the risk of suffocation, federal regulations require that mechanisms be provided and procedures be included so that, within the refuge alternative, the oxygen concentration is maintained at levels between 18.5% and 23% for 96 h. The regulation also requires that, during use of the RA, the concentration of carbon dioxide should not exceed 1%, and the concentration of carbon monoxide should not exceed 25 ppm. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) evaluated the cryogenic air supply's ability to provide breathable air for a refuge alternative. A propane smoker was used to simulate human breathing by burning propane gas which will consume O2 and generate CO2 and H2O. The rate of propane burned at the smoker was controlled to represent the O2 consumption rate for the breathing of a certain number of people. Two 96-h tests were conducted in a sealed shipping container, which was used as a surrogate for a refuge alternative. While burning propane gas to simulate human oxygen consumption, cryogenic air was provided to the shipping container to determine if the cryogenic air supply would keep the O2 level above 18.5% and CO2 level below 1% inside the shipping container as required by the federal regulations pertaining to refuge alternatives. Both of the 96-h tests simulated the breathing of 21 persons. The first test used the oxygen consumption rate (1.32 cu ft of pure oxygen per hour per person) specified in federal regulations, while the second test used the oxygen consumption rate specified by (Bernard et al. 2018, "Estimation of Metabolic Heat Input for Refuge Alternative Thermal Testing and Simulation," Min. Eng., 70(8), pp. 50-54) (0.67 cu ft of pure oxygen per hour per person). The test data shows that during both 96-h tests, the oxygen level was maintained within a 21-23% range, and the CO2 level was maintained below 1% (0.2-0.45%). The information in this paper could be useful when applying a cryogenic air supply as a breathable air source for an underground refuge alternative or other confined space. [DOI: 10.1115/1.4064062].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信