哪些树木能形成最好的土壤?22 个树种下的矿山复垦土壤特性:50 年后的物理和化学特性评估

IF 2.6 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Marko Spasić, Oldřich Vacek, Kateřina Vejvodová, Václav Tejnecký, Petra Vokurková, Petra Križová, Filip Polák, Radim Vašát, Luboš Borůvka, Ondřej Drábek
{"title":"哪些树木能形成最好的土壤?22 个树种下的矿山复垦土壤特性:50 年后的物理和化学特性评估","authors":"Marko Spasić, Oldřich Vacek, Kateřina Vejvodová, Václav Tejnecký, Petra Vokurková, Petra Križová, Filip Polák, Radim Vašát, Luboš Borůvka, Ondřej Drábek","doi":"10.1007/s10342-023-01637-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Forest reclamations have been very commonly used on post-mining sites in central Europe and offer great opportunities for research of soil formation process. Antonín forest arboretum near Sokolov, Czech Republic, reclaimed and afforested between 1972 and 1974 was the opportunity to compare the influence of only the vegetation variable. In this research, physical and chemical soil properties from the uppermost mineral 5 cm of 23 stands (11 broadleaved and 12 coniferous) were analysed and compared. Soil pH, bulk density, porosity, water retention capacity, organic and total carbon and nitrogen content, plant available nutrients and potentially toxic elements were analysed. From the species tested, the soil properties that can generally be considered beneficial were noticed in <i>Alnus glutinosa</i>, <i>Fagus sylvatica</i>, <i>Tilia cordata</i>, <i>Pyrus communis</i>, <i>Picea pungens</i> and <i>Pinus ponderosa</i>. On the other hand, species that have not shown these soil properties were <i>Betula pendula</i>, <i>Larix decidua</i>, <i>Picea abies</i>, <i>Pinus rotundata</i>, <i>Pinus strobus</i> and <i>Pinus sylvestris</i>. It is also worth mentioning that, although some species have shown soil properties that can be considered more or less favourable from a pedological point of view, the choice of species for afforestation of post-mining sites needs to consider other factors as well, like stand health, growth potential, affinity to climatic, hydrological, and other factors, potential invasiveness, susceptibility to pathogens.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical abstract</h3>","PeriodicalId":11996,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Forest Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Which trees form the best soil? Reclaimed mine soil properties under 22 tree species: 50 years later—assessment of physical and chemical properties\",\"authors\":\"Marko Spasić, Oldřich Vacek, Kateřina Vejvodová, Václav Tejnecký, Petra Vokurková, Petra Križová, Filip Polák, Radim Vašát, Luboš Borůvka, Ondřej Drábek\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10342-023-01637-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Forest reclamations have been very commonly used on post-mining sites in central Europe and offer great opportunities for research of soil formation process. Antonín forest arboretum near Sokolov, Czech Republic, reclaimed and afforested between 1972 and 1974 was the opportunity to compare the influence of only the vegetation variable. In this research, physical and chemical soil properties from the uppermost mineral 5 cm of 23 stands (11 broadleaved and 12 coniferous) were analysed and compared. Soil pH, bulk density, porosity, water retention capacity, organic and total carbon and nitrogen content, plant available nutrients and potentially toxic elements were analysed. From the species tested, the soil properties that can generally be considered beneficial were noticed in <i>Alnus glutinosa</i>, <i>Fagus sylvatica</i>, <i>Tilia cordata</i>, <i>Pyrus communis</i>, <i>Picea pungens</i> and <i>Pinus ponderosa</i>. On the other hand, species that have not shown these soil properties were <i>Betula pendula</i>, <i>Larix decidua</i>, <i>Picea abies</i>, <i>Pinus rotundata</i>, <i>Pinus strobus</i> and <i>Pinus sylvestris</i>. It is also worth mentioning that, although some species have shown soil properties that can be considered more or less favourable from a pedological point of view, the choice of species for afforestation of post-mining sites needs to consider other factors as well, like stand health, growth potential, affinity to climatic, hydrological, and other factors, potential invasiveness, susceptibility to pathogens.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Graphical abstract</h3>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Forest Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Forest Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-023-01637-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Forest Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-023-01637-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在中欧的采矿后地区,森林植被恢复非常普遍,这为研究土壤形成过程提供了很好的机会。捷克共和国索科洛夫(Sokolov)附近的安东宁森林树木园在 1972 年至 1974 年期间进行了开垦和植树造林,这为比较仅植被变量的影响提供了机会。在这项研究中,对 23 个林分(11 个阔叶林分和 12 个针叶林分)最上层 5 厘米矿质土壤的物理和化学特性进行了分析和比较。分析了土壤的 pH 值、容重、孔隙度、保水能力、有机碳和总碳以及氮的含量、植物可利用的养分和潜在的有毒元素。从测试的树种来看,一般认为有益的土壤特性在桤木(Alnus glutinosa)、法桐(Fagus sylvatica)、椴树(Tilia cordata)、黄柏(Pyrus communis)、松柏(Picea pungens)和松柏(Pinus ponderosa)中有所体现。另一方面,没有显示出这些土壤特性的树种有悬铃木、颓子落叶松、桤木、罗汉松、欧洲赤松和欧洲赤松。还值得一提的是,虽然从土壤学的角度来看,有些树种表现出的土壤特性或多或少可以被认为是有利的,但在矿区后植树造林时选择树种还需要考虑其他因素,如林木的健康状况、生长潜力、与气候、水文和其他因素的亲和性、潜在的入侵性、对病原体的易感性等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Which trees form the best soil? Reclaimed mine soil properties under 22 tree species: 50 years later—assessment of physical and chemical properties

Which trees form the best soil? Reclaimed mine soil properties under 22 tree species: 50 years later—assessment of physical and chemical properties

Forest reclamations have been very commonly used on post-mining sites in central Europe and offer great opportunities for research of soil formation process. Antonín forest arboretum near Sokolov, Czech Republic, reclaimed and afforested between 1972 and 1974 was the opportunity to compare the influence of only the vegetation variable. In this research, physical and chemical soil properties from the uppermost mineral 5 cm of 23 stands (11 broadleaved and 12 coniferous) were analysed and compared. Soil pH, bulk density, porosity, water retention capacity, organic and total carbon and nitrogen content, plant available nutrients and potentially toxic elements were analysed. From the species tested, the soil properties that can generally be considered beneficial were noticed in Alnus glutinosa, Fagus sylvatica, Tilia cordata, Pyrus communis, Picea pungens and Pinus ponderosa. On the other hand, species that have not shown these soil properties were Betula pendula, Larix decidua, Picea abies, Pinus rotundata, Pinus strobus and Pinus sylvestris. It is also worth mentioning that, although some species have shown soil properties that can be considered more or less favourable from a pedological point of view, the choice of species for afforestation of post-mining sites needs to consider other factors as well, like stand health, growth potential, affinity to climatic, hydrological, and other factors, potential invasiveness, susceptibility to pathogens.

Graphical abstract

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Forest Research focuses on publishing innovative results of empirical or model-oriented studies which contribute to the development of broad principles underlying forest ecosystems, their functions and services. Papers which exclusively report methods, models, techniques or case studies are beyond the scope of the journal, while papers on studies at the molecular or cellular level will be considered where they address the relevance of their results to the understanding of ecosystem structure and function. Papers relating to forest operations and forest engineering will be considered if they are tailored within a forest ecosystem context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信