不同类型义齿使用一年后的临床磨损情况:临床研究

Nader Abdulhameed, Bryce Volschow, Tania Abedi, Nicole Bifaretti, Inessa Slipak, Alexandra Manibo, Hind Hussein
{"title":"不同类型义齿使用一年后的临床磨损情况:临床研究","authors":"Nader Abdulhameed, Bryce Volschow, Tania Abedi, Nicole Bifaretti, Inessa Slipak, Alexandra Manibo, Hind Hussein","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.11.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Statement of problem</h3><p>Worn denture teeth are a common reason for replacing complete dentures. However, clinical studies on the amount of denture tooth wear are lacking.</p><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this clinical study was to compare the clinical wear of denture teeth made from double cross-linked (DCL) versus highly cross-linked (HCL) materials after 1 year in service.</p><h3>Material and methods</h3><p><span>Fourteen participants received maxillary and mandibular removable complete dentures (RCDs). The participants randomly received either DCL or HCL teeth. Each RCD was scanned with an intraoral scanner 1 week after finishing any </span>occlusal adjustment<span><span> and after 1 year. Occlusal contact marks were recorded using </span>articulating paper<span>, and photographs were made in centric and eccentric movements. The generated 1-week and 1-year standard tessellation language (STL) files of the scans were obtained and trimmed using the Geomagic X software program. After merging the files, the depth of the wear facets was measured using the software program tool that measures the vertical gap distance in micrometers at 100 points distributed on the contact areas. These areas were identified by using the segment tools in the software program. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyze the differences between the collected data (α=.05).</span></span></p><h3>Results</h3><p>The DCL had higher mean ±standard deviation wear (62.7 ±40 µm) than the HCL (37 ±31 µm) after 1 year in service (<em>P</em>&lt;.001).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Both DCL and HCL denture teeth showed acceptable clinical wear after 1 year of clinical use. HCL denture teeth showed more resistance to occlusal wear than DCL denture teeth.</p>","PeriodicalId":501672,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical wear of different types of denture teeth after one year in service: A clinical study\",\"authors\":\"Nader Abdulhameed, Bryce Volschow, Tania Abedi, Nicole Bifaretti, Inessa Slipak, Alexandra Manibo, Hind Hussein\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.11.031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Statement of problem</h3><p>Worn denture teeth are a common reason for replacing complete dentures. However, clinical studies on the amount of denture tooth wear are lacking.</p><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this clinical study was to compare the clinical wear of denture teeth made from double cross-linked (DCL) versus highly cross-linked (HCL) materials after 1 year in service.</p><h3>Material and methods</h3><p><span>Fourteen participants received maxillary and mandibular removable complete dentures (RCDs). The participants randomly received either DCL or HCL teeth. Each RCD was scanned with an intraoral scanner 1 week after finishing any </span>occlusal adjustment<span><span> and after 1 year. Occlusal contact marks were recorded using </span>articulating paper<span>, and photographs were made in centric and eccentric movements. The generated 1-week and 1-year standard tessellation language (STL) files of the scans were obtained and trimmed using the Geomagic X software program. After merging the files, the depth of the wear facets was measured using the software program tool that measures the vertical gap distance in micrometers at 100 points distributed on the contact areas. These areas were identified by using the segment tools in the software program. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyze the differences between the collected data (α=.05).</span></span></p><h3>Results</h3><p>The DCL had higher mean ±standard deviation wear (62.7 ±40 µm) than the HCL (37 ±31 µm) after 1 year in service (<em>P</em>&lt;.001).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Both DCL and HCL denture teeth showed acceptable clinical wear after 1 year of clinical use. HCL denture teeth showed more resistance to occlusal wear than DCL denture teeth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.11.031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.11.031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题陈述义齿磨损是更换全口义齿的常见原因。本临床研究的目的是比较使用双交联(DCL)和高交联(HCL)材料制作的义齿在使用一年后的临床磨损情况。参与者随机获得 DCL 或 HCL 牙齿。在完成任何咬合调整一周后和一年后,用口内扫描仪对每个 RCD 进行扫描。使用关节纸记录咬合接触痕迹,并拍摄向心和偏心运动时的照片。使用 Geomagic X 软件程序获取扫描一周和一年后生成的标准网格语言(STL)文件并进行修剪。合并文件后,使用软件程序工具测量磨损面的深度,该工具可以测量分布在接触区域 100 个点上的垂直间隙距离,单位为微米。这些区域是通过软件程序中的分段工具确定的。结果使用 1 年后,DCL 的平均±标准偏差磨损(62.7 ±40 µm)高于 HCL(37 ±31 µm)(P< .001)。HCL 义齿比 DCL 义齿更耐咬合磨损。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical wear of different types of denture teeth after one year in service: A clinical study

Statement of problem

Worn denture teeth are a common reason for replacing complete dentures. However, clinical studies on the amount of denture tooth wear are lacking.

Purpose

The purpose of this clinical study was to compare the clinical wear of denture teeth made from double cross-linked (DCL) versus highly cross-linked (HCL) materials after 1 year in service.

Material and methods

Fourteen participants received maxillary and mandibular removable complete dentures (RCDs). The participants randomly received either DCL or HCL teeth. Each RCD was scanned with an intraoral scanner 1 week after finishing any occlusal adjustment and after 1 year. Occlusal contact marks were recorded using articulating paper, and photographs were made in centric and eccentric movements. The generated 1-week and 1-year standard tessellation language (STL) files of the scans were obtained and trimmed using the Geomagic X software program. After merging the files, the depth of the wear facets was measured using the software program tool that measures the vertical gap distance in micrometers at 100 points distributed on the contact areas. These areas were identified by using the segment tools in the software program. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyze the differences between the collected data (α=.05).

Results

The DCL had higher mean ±standard deviation wear (62.7 ±40 µm) than the HCL (37 ±31 µm) after 1 year in service (P<.001).

Conclusions

Both DCL and HCL denture teeth showed acceptable clinical wear after 1 year of clinical use. HCL denture teeth showed more resistance to occlusal wear than DCL denture teeth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信