{"title":"(3002) 建议保留 Crotalaria ferruginea 这一名称，以反对 C. leioloba（豆科）。","authors":"Vibha Chauhan, Anis Ahmad Ansari","doi":"10.1002/tax.13112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>(3002) <b><i>Crotalaria ferruginea</i></b> Graham ex Benth. in London J. Bot. 2: 476. 1843 [Angiosp.: <i>Legum</i>.], nom. cons. prop.</p>\n<p><b>Lectotypus (hic designatus):</b> Nepalia, 1821, <i>Wallich</i> (Numer. List No. 5398) (K-W barcode K001120776; isolectotypi: CAL No. 102712, K barcode K000633870).</p>\n<p>(=) <i>Crotalaria leioloba</i> Bartl., Index Sem. Hort. Acad. Gott. 1837: 2. 1837, nom. rej. prop.</p>\n<p>Neotypus (vide Adema in Blumea 51: 314–315. 2006): Java, Tengger, Bromo, Mer de Sable au Pied du Col de I'Idjen, 23 Jan 1905, <i>Hochreutiner 2747</i> (L barcode L0479215).</p>\n<p>The name <i>Crotalaria ferruginea</i> Graham ex Benth. (in London J. Bot. 2: 476–477. 1843) has been used for over 100 years for a species occurring in India, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines, Taiwan, Papua New Guinea, China, Laos, Thailand, Vietnam, and introduced in North America. It was first published without a description (nomen nudum) by Wallich in his catalogue (Wallich, Numer. List: 187, No. 5398. 1831–1832).</p>\n<p>Bentham (l.c. 1843) in an account of legumes in southern Asia and central and southern Africa, validated <i>Crotalaria ferruginea</i> providing a description and reporting its occurrence on the “Mountains of India. Goolpara, <i>Hamilton!</i> Nipal, <i>Wallich!</i> Mishmee hills, <i>Griffiths!</i> n. 19, Taong Dong, <i>Wallich!</i> also Ceylon, <i>Walker!</i>” Bentham in his protologue ascribed the name to “Grah! in Wall. Cat. n. 5398”. Bentham (l.c. 1843: 570), in discussing other names in <i>Crotalaria</i>, also noted that “C. <i>leioloba</i> (Bartl. Ind. Sem. Hort. Gott. 1837 ex Linnaea 12, Littbl. p. 80) is probably the C. <i>ferruginea</i>” that he had described on p. 476. Later Ansari (Crotalaria India: 107. 2008) attempted to designate Wall. Cat no. 5398 as lectotype of <i>C. ferruginea</i>, but his action was ineffective as he did not include “designated here” as required in 2008 (Art. 7.11 of the <i>ICN</i>; Turland & al. in Regnum Veg. 159. 2018).</p>\n<p>Earlier workers such as Mohl & Schlechtendal in their account of Bentham's (l.c. 1843) publication (in Bot. Zeitung (Berlin) 2: 358. 1844), Bentham (in Miquel, Pl. Jungh.: 205. 1852), Miquel (Fl. Ned. Ind. 1: 327. 1855), Baker (in Hooker, Fl. Brit. India 2: 68. 1876), Engler (in Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 29: 411. 1901), Prain (Bengal Pl.: 375. 1903), De Munk (in Reinwardtia 6: 195–223. 1962), Thuân (in Morat, Fl. Cambodge Laos Viêtnam 23: 228. 1987), Niyomdham (in Thai Forest Bull. Bot. 11: 131. 1978), and others in innumerable publications adopted the name <i>Crotalaria ferruginea</i>. In this, they were followed by Ansari (l.c.), Li & al. (in Wu & Raven, Fl. China 10: 112. 2010; http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200012063), Babu & al. (in J. Econ. Taxon. Bot. 38: 634–649. 2014), Khanna (in Geophytology 47: 69–110. 2017), Ansari & Chauhan (Suppl. Fl. Crotalaria India: 24. 2020), Balan & Pradeep (in J. Threat. Taxa 13: 18257–18282. 2021), and Gholave & al. (in Nordic J. Bot. 1: 1–6. 2022).</p>\n<p><i>Crotalaria leioloba</i> Bartl. (Index Sem. Hort. Acad. Gott. 1837: 2. 1837) (as ‘<i>lejoloba</i>’) is based on specimens collected by Bartling; the name was later reproduced in Linnaea 12 (Litt.): 80. 1838). The collections made by Bartling are presently not traceable.</p>\n<p>Walpers (Repert. Bot. Syst. 1: 595. 1842), Hochreutiner (in Candollea 2: 73. 1925), and Alston (in Trimen, Handb. Fl. Ceylon 6: 68. 1931) accepted <i>Crotalaria leioloba</i> as the correct name for the species but did not mention <i>C. ferruginea</i>. Adema (in Blumea 51: 314–315. 2006), Ninkaew & al. (in Phytotaxa 320: 33–34. 2017), eflora india bsi (2022) (as <i>C. lejoloba</i>) and POWO (World Checklist of Vascular Plants, 2022: https://powo.science.kew.org/) all accept <i>C. leioloba</i> as the correct name for the species and cite <i>C. ferruginea</i> as its synonym.</p>\n<p>The rationale for conserving the name <i>Crotalaria ferruginea</i> is the widespread use of the name ranging from the time of its first appearance in Wallich's Catalogue (Wallich, l.c.), and its valid publication by Bentham (l.c. 1843). In contrast, <i>C. leioloba</i> occurs mostly as a synonym in the literature and has only recently been accepted. The species widely known as <i>C. ferruginea</i> has a wide distribution spread over several countries. In India, it is found in several states growing abundantly in some areas. In summary, <i>C. ferruginea</i> is currently in wide use whereas the earlier <i>C. leioloba</i> is not yet widely accepted. Therefore, it is proposed to conserve the former name against the latter.</p>","PeriodicalId":49448,"journal":{"name":"Taxon","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"(3002) Proposal to conserve the name Crotalaria ferruginea against C. leioloba (Fabaceae)\",\"authors\":\"Vibha Chauhan, Anis Ahmad Ansari\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/tax.13112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>(3002) <b><i>Crotalaria ferruginea</i></b> Graham ex Benth. in London J. Bot. 2: 476. 1843 [Angiosp.: <i>Legum</i>.], nom. cons. prop.</p>\\n<p><b>Lectotypus (hic designatus):</b> Nepalia, 1821, <i>Wallich</i> (Numer. List No. 5398) (K-W barcode K001120776; isolectotypi: CAL No. 102712, K barcode K000633870).</p>\\n<p>(=) <i>Crotalaria leioloba</i> Bartl., Index Sem. Hort. Acad. Gott. 1837: 2. 1837, nom. rej. prop.</p>\\n<p>Neotypus (vide Adema in Blumea 51: 314–315. 2006): Java, Tengger, Bromo, Mer de Sable au Pied du Col de I'Idjen, 23 Jan 1905, <i>Hochreutiner 2747</i> (L barcode L0479215).</p>\\n<p>The name <i>Crotalaria ferruginea</i> Graham ex Benth. (in London J. Bot. 2: 476–477. 1843) has been used for over 100 years for a species occurring in India, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines, Taiwan, Papua New Guinea, China, Laos, Thailand, Vietnam, and introduced in North America. It was first published without a description (nomen nudum) by Wallich in his catalogue (Wallich, Numer. List: 187, No. 5398. 1831–1832).</p>\\n<p>Bentham (l.c. 1843) in an account of legumes in southern Asia and central and southern Africa, validated <i>Crotalaria ferruginea</i> providing a description and reporting its occurrence on the “Mountains of India. Goolpara, <i>Hamilton!</i> Nipal, <i>Wallich!</i> Mishmee hills, <i>Griffiths!</i> n. 19, Taong Dong, <i>Wallich!</i> also Ceylon, <i>Walker!</i>” Bentham in his protologue ascribed the name to “Grah! in Wall. Cat. n. 5398”. Bentham (l.c. 1843: 570), in discussing other names in <i>Crotalaria</i>, also noted that “C. <i>leioloba</i> (Bartl. Ind. Sem. Hort. Gott. 1837 ex Linnaea 12, Littbl. p. 80) is probably the C. <i>ferruginea</i>” that he had described on p. 476. Later Ansari (Crotalaria India: 107. 2008) attempted to designate Wall. Cat no. 5398 as lectotype of <i>C. ferruginea</i>, but his action was ineffective as he did not include “designated here” as required in 2008 (Art. 7.11 of the <i>ICN</i>; Turland & al. in Regnum Veg. 159. 2018).</p>\\n<p>Earlier workers such as Mohl & Schlechtendal in their account of Bentham's (l.c. 1843) publication (in Bot. Zeitung (Berlin) 2: 358. 1844), Bentham (in Miquel, Pl. Jungh.: 205. 1852), Miquel (Fl. Ned. Ind. 1: 327. 1855), Baker (in Hooker, Fl. Brit. India 2: 68. 1876), Engler (in Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 29: 411. 1901), Prain (Bengal Pl.: 375. 1903), De Munk (in Reinwardtia 6: 195–223. 1962), Thuân (in Morat, Fl. Cambodge Laos Viêtnam 23: 228. 1987), Niyomdham (in Thai Forest Bull. Bot. 11: 131. 1978), and others in innumerable publications adopted the name <i>Crotalaria ferruginea</i>. In this, they were followed by Ansari (l.c.), Li & al. (in Wu & Raven, Fl. China 10: 112. 2010; http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200012063), Babu & al. (in J. Econ. Taxon. Bot. 38: 634–649. 2014), Khanna (in Geophytology 47: 69–110. 2017), Ansari & Chauhan (Suppl. Fl. Crotalaria India: 24. 2020), Balan & Pradeep (in J. Threat. Taxa 13: 18257–18282. 2021), and Gholave & al. (in Nordic J. Bot. 1: 1–6. 2022).</p>\\n<p><i>Crotalaria leioloba</i> Bartl. (Index Sem. Hort. Acad. Gott. 1837: 2. 1837) (as ‘<i>lejoloba</i>’) is based on specimens collected by Bartling; the name was later reproduced in Linnaea 12 (Litt.): 80. 1838). The collections made by Bartling are presently not traceable.</p>\\n<p>Walpers (Repert. Bot. Syst. 1: 595. 1842), Hochreutiner (in Candollea 2: 73. 1925), and Alston (in Trimen, Handb. Fl. Ceylon 6: 68. 1931) accepted <i>Crotalaria leioloba</i> as the correct name for the species but did not mention <i>C. ferruginea</i>. Adema (in Blumea 51: 314–315. 2006), Ninkaew & al. (in Phytotaxa 320: 33–34. 2017), eflora india bsi (2022) (as <i>C. lejoloba</i>) and POWO (World Checklist of Vascular Plants, 2022: https://powo.science.kew.org/) all accept <i>C. leioloba</i> as the correct name for the species and cite <i>C. ferruginea</i> as its synonym.</p>\\n<p>The rationale for conserving the name <i>Crotalaria ferruginea</i> is the widespread use of the name ranging from the time of its first appearance in Wallich's Catalogue (Wallich, l.c.), and its valid publication by Bentham (l.c. 1843). In contrast, <i>C. leioloba</i> occurs mostly as a synonym in the literature and has only recently been accepted. The species widely known as <i>C. ferruginea</i> has a wide distribution spread over several countries. In India, it is found in several states growing abundantly in some areas. In summary, <i>C. ferruginea</i> is currently in wide use whereas the earlier <i>C. leioloba</i> is not yet widely accepted. Therefore, it is proposed to conserve the former name against the latter.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Taxon\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Taxon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13112\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taxon","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13112","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
(3002) Crotalaria ferruginea Graham ex Benth. in London J. Bot.2: 476.1843 [Angiosp：Nepalia, 1821, Wallich (Numer. List No. 5398) (K-W barcode K001120776; isolectotypi: CAL No. 102712, K barcode K000633870). (=) Crotalaria leioloba Bartl.Hort.Acad.Gott.1837: 2. 1837, nom：Java, Tengger, Bromo, Mer de Sable au Pied du Col de I'Idjen, 23 Jan 1905, Hochreutiner 2747 (L barcode L0479215).The name Crotalaria ferruginea Graham ex Benth.(1843 年）已被用于 100 多年，该物种分布于印度、斯里兰卡、尼泊尔、不丹、孟加拉国、缅甸、马来西亚、印度尼西亚、菲律宾、台湾、巴布亚新几内亚、中国、老挝、泰国、越南，并被引入北美。本瑟姆（l.c. 1843 年）在一篇关于南亚、中部和南部非洲豆科植物的文章中确认了 Crotalaria ferruginea 的存在，并对其进行了描述，报告了它在 "印度山区 "的分布。Goolpara, Hamilton！尼帕尔、瓦利奇19，Taong Dong，Wallich！还有锡兰，Walker！"。本瑟姆在他的原型中将该名称归于 "Wall.Cat.n.5398 中的 Grah！"。Cat. n. 5398"。Bentham（l.c. 1843: 570）在讨论 Crotalaria 的其他名称时还指出，"C. leioloba（Bartl. Ind. Sem. Hort. Gott. 1837 ex Linnaea 12, Littbl. p. 80）可能就是他在第 476 页描述的 C. ferruginea。后来 Ansari（Crotalaria 印度： 107.Cat no. 5398 作为 C. ferruginea 的 lectotype，但他的行动没有效果，因为他没有按照 2008 年的要求（《国际植物名录》第 7.11 条；Turland & al. in Regnum Veg.Zeitung (Berlin) 2: 358.1844 年）、Bentham（在 Miquel，Pl.Jungh.：205.1852 年）、Miquel（Fl.Ned.Ind.1：327.1855 年）、Baker（在 Hooker，Fl.Brit.India 2：68.1876 年）、Engler（在 Bot.Jahrb.Syst.29：411.1901 年）、Prain（Bengal Pl.：375.1903), De Munk (in Reinwardtia 6: 195-223. 1962), Thuân (in Morat, Fl. Cambodge Laos Viêtnam 23: 228. 1987), Niyomdham (in Thai Forest Bull. Bot. 11: 131. 1978), and others in innumerable publications adopted the name Crotalaria ferruginea.Ansari (l.c.), Li & al. (in Wu & Raven, Fl. China 10: 112.中国 10: 112.2010; http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200012063), Babu & al. (in J. Econ. Taxon. Bot. 38: 634-649. 2014), Khanna (in Geophytology 47: 69-110. 2017), Ansari & Chauhan (Suppl.Fl. Crotalaria India: 24. 2020）、Balan & Pradeep (in J. Threat. Taxa 13: 18257-18282. 2021), and Gholave & al. (in Nordic J. Bot. 1: 1-6. 2022).Crotalaria leioloba Bartl.(索引 Sem. Hort. Acad. Gott. 1837: 2. 1837) (as 'lejoloba') 是基于 Bartling 采集的标本；该名称后来在 Linnaea 12 (Litt.)：80.1838).1842), Hochreutiner (in Candollea 2: 73. 1925), and Alston (in Trimen, Handb. Fl. Ceylon 6: 68. 1931) accepted Crotalaria leioloba as the correct name for the species but did not mention C. ferruginea.Adema (in Blumea 51: 314-315. 2006), Ninkaew & al. (in Phytotaxa 320: 33-34. 2017), eflora india bsi (2022) (as C. lejoloba) and POWO (World Checklist of Vascular Plants, 2022: https://powo.science.kew.org/) all accept C. leioloba as the correct name for the species and cite C. ferruginea as its synonym.保留 Crotalaria ferruginea 这一名称的理由是，该名称自首次出现在 Wallich 的目录（Wallich，l.c.）中起就被广泛使用，并由 Bentham（l.c. 1843 年）有效发表。相比之下，C. leioloba 在文献中大多作为异名出现，直到最近才被接受。被广泛称为 C. ferruginea 的物种分布广泛，遍布多个国家。在印度的几个邦，它在一些地区生长茂盛。总之，C. ferruginea 目前被广泛使用，而较早的 C. leioloba 尚未被广泛接受。因此，建议保留前者的名称，而使用后者的名称。
(3002) Proposal to conserve the name Crotalaria ferruginea against C. leioloba (Fabaceae)
(3002) Crotalaria ferruginea Graham ex Benth. in London J. Bot. 2: 476. 1843 [Angiosp.: Legum.], nom. cons. prop.
Lectotypus (hic designatus): Nepalia, 1821, Wallich (Numer. List No. 5398) (K-W barcode K001120776; isolectotypi: CAL No. 102712, K barcode K000633870).
(=) Crotalaria leioloba Bartl., Index Sem. Hort. Acad. Gott. 1837: 2. 1837, nom. rej. prop.
Neotypus (vide Adema in Blumea 51: 314–315. 2006): Java, Tengger, Bromo, Mer de Sable au Pied du Col de I'Idjen, 23 Jan 1905, Hochreutiner 2747 (L barcode L0479215).
The name Crotalaria ferruginea Graham ex Benth. (in London J. Bot. 2: 476–477. 1843) has been used for over 100 years for a species occurring in India, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines, Taiwan, Papua New Guinea, China, Laos, Thailand, Vietnam, and introduced in North America. It was first published without a description (nomen nudum) by Wallich in his catalogue (Wallich, Numer. List: 187, No. 5398. 1831–1832).
Bentham (l.c. 1843) in an account of legumes in southern Asia and central and southern Africa, validated Crotalaria ferruginea providing a description and reporting its occurrence on the “Mountains of India. Goolpara, Hamilton! Nipal, Wallich! Mishmee hills, Griffiths! n. 19, Taong Dong, Wallich! also Ceylon, Walker!” Bentham in his protologue ascribed the name to “Grah! in Wall. Cat. n. 5398”. Bentham (l.c. 1843: 570), in discussing other names in Crotalaria, also noted that “C. leioloba (Bartl. Ind. Sem. Hort. Gott. 1837 ex Linnaea 12, Littbl. p. 80) is probably the C. ferruginea” that he had described on p. 476. Later Ansari (Crotalaria India: 107. 2008) attempted to designate Wall. Cat no. 5398 as lectotype of C. ferruginea, but his action was ineffective as he did not include “designated here” as required in 2008 (Art. 7.11 of the ICN; Turland & al. in Regnum Veg. 159. 2018).
Earlier workers such as Mohl & Schlechtendal in their account of Bentham's (l.c. 1843) publication (in Bot. Zeitung (Berlin) 2: 358. 1844), Bentham (in Miquel, Pl. Jungh.: 205. 1852), Miquel (Fl. Ned. Ind. 1: 327. 1855), Baker (in Hooker, Fl. Brit. India 2: 68. 1876), Engler (in Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 29: 411. 1901), Prain (Bengal Pl.: 375. 1903), De Munk (in Reinwardtia 6: 195–223. 1962), Thuân (in Morat, Fl. Cambodge Laos Viêtnam 23: 228. 1987), Niyomdham (in Thai Forest Bull. Bot. 11: 131. 1978), and others in innumerable publications adopted the name Crotalaria ferruginea. In this, they were followed by Ansari (l.c.), Li & al. (in Wu & Raven, Fl. China 10: 112. 2010; http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200012063), Babu & al. (in J. Econ. Taxon. Bot. 38: 634–649. 2014), Khanna (in Geophytology 47: 69–110. 2017), Ansari & Chauhan (Suppl. Fl. Crotalaria India: 24. 2020), Balan & Pradeep (in J. Threat. Taxa 13: 18257–18282. 2021), and Gholave & al. (in Nordic J. Bot. 1: 1–6. 2022).
Crotalaria leioloba Bartl. (Index Sem. Hort. Acad. Gott. 1837: 2. 1837) (as ‘lejoloba’) is based on specimens collected by Bartling; the name was later reproduced in Linnaea 12 (Litt.): 80. 1838). The collections made by Bartling are presently not traceable.
Walpers (Repert. Bot. Syst. 1: 595. 1842), Hochreutiner (in Candollea 2: 73. 1925), and Alston (in Trimen, Handb. Fl. Ceylon 6: 68. 1931) accepted Crotalaria leioloba as the correct name for the species but did not mention C. ferruginea. Adema (in Blumea 51: 314–315. 2006), Ninkaew & al. (in Phytotaxa 320: 33–34. 2017), eflora india bsi (2022) (as C. lejoloba) and POWO (World Checklist of Vascular Plants, 2022: https://powo.science.kew.org/) all accept C. leioloba as the correct name for the species and cite C. ferruginea as its synonym.
The rationale for conserving the name Crotalaria ferruginea is the widespread use of the name ranging from the time of its first appearance in Wallich's Catalogue (Wallich, l.c.), and its valid publication by Bentham (l.c. 1843). In contrast, C. leioloba occurs mostly as a synonym in the literature and has only recently been accepted. The species widely known as C. ferruginea has a wide distribution spread over several countries. In India, it is found in several states growing abundantly in some areas. In summary, C. ferruginea is currently in wide use whereas the earlier C. leioloba is not yet widely accepted. Therefore, it is proposed to conserve the former name against the latter.
期刊介绍：
TAXON is the bi-monthly journal of the International Association for Plant Taxonomy and is devoted to systematic and evolutionary biology with emphasis on plants and fungi. It is published bimonthly by the International Bureau for Plant Taxonomy and Nomenclature, c/o Institute of Botany, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, SK-845 23 Bratislava, SLOVAKIA. Details of page charges are given in the Guidelines for authors. Papers will be reviewed by at least two specialists.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
