信息租金与过度进入定理:隐藏行动的案例*

IF 0.9 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Marco de Pinto, Laszlo Goerke, Alberto Palermo
{"title":"信息租金与过度进入定理:隐藏行动的案例*","authors":"Marco de Pinto, Laszlo Goerke, Alberto Palermo","doi":"10.1111/sjpe.12371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Entry in a homogeneous Cournot-oligopoly is excessive if there is business-stealing. These findings assume that production costs reduce profits and welfare equally. If firms pay informational rents due to frictions in the employer–employee relationship, production costs partly reflect transfers, which do not alter welfare directly. We investigate the excessive entry theorem in the presence of rents. We find that informational rents can invalidate the theorem. Rents reduce profits and deter entry into the market equilibrium, while the socially optimal number of firms is not affected directly. The rent effect becomes stronger the lower the number of firms and can overcompensate the business-stealing externality. As an example, we model a hidden action problem in which employees have an informational advantage after signing the contract with the firm. Insufficient entry occurs if entry costs are sufficiently high because they lower the number of firms and raise informational rents.","PeriodicalId":47171,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Journal of Political Economy","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Informational rents and the excessive entry theorem: The case of hidden action*\",\"authors\":\"Marco de Pinto, Laszlo Goerke, Alberto Palermo\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/sjpe.12371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Entry in a homogeneous Cournot-oligopoly is excessive if there is business-stealing. These findings assume that production costs reduce profits and welfare equally. If firms pay informational rents due to frictions in the employer–employee relationship, production costs partly reflect transfers, which do not alter welfare directly. We investigate the excessive entry theorem in the presence of rents. We find that informational rents can invalidate the theorem. Rents reduce profits and deter entry into the market equilibrium, while the socially optimal number of firms is not affected directly. The rent effect becomes stronger the lower the number of firms and can overcompensate the business-stealing externality. As an example, we model a hidden action problem in which employees have an informational advantage after signing the contract with the firm. Insufficient entry occurs if entry costs are sufficiently high because they lower the number of firms and raise informational rents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scottish Journal of Political Economy\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scottish Journal of Political Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/sjpe.12371\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scottish Journal of Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sjpe.12371","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在同质库诺-寡头垄断中,如果存在抢生意现象,则会出现过度进入。这些结论假定生产成本同样会降低利润和福利。如果企业因雇主-雇员关系中的摩擦而支付信息租金,生产成本就会部分反映转移,而这并不会直接改变福利。我们研究了存在租金时的过度进入定理。我们发现,信息租金会使该定理失效。租金会降低利润,阻止企业进入市场均衡,而社会最优企业数量不会受到直接影响。企业数量越少,租金效应越强,并能过度补偿抢生意的外部性。举例来说,我们建立了一个隐性行动问题模型,其中雇员在与企业签订合同后拥有信息优势。如果进入成本足够高,就会出现进入不足的现象,因为进入成本会降低企业数量,提高信息租金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Informational rents and the excessive entry theorem: The case of hidden action*
Entry in a homogeneous Cournot-oligopoly is excessive if there is business-stealing. These findings assume that production costs reduce profits and welfare equally. If firms pay informational rents due to frictions in the employer–employee relationship, production costs partly reflect transfers, which do not alter welfare directly. We investigate the excessive entry theorem in the presence of rents. We find that informational rents can invalidate the theorem. Rents reduce profits and deter entry into the market equilibrium, while the socially optimal number of firms is not affected directly. The rent effect becomes stronger the lower the number of firms and can overcompensate the business-stealing externality. As an example, we model a hidden action problem in which employees have an informational advantage after signing the contract with the firm. Insufficient entry occurs if entry costs are sufficiently high because they lower the number of firms and raise informational rents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The Scottish Journal of Political Economy is a generalist journal with an explicitly international reach in both readership and authorship. It is dedicated to publishing the highest quality research in any field of economics, without prejudice to the methodology or to the analytical techniques used. The editors encourage submissions in all fields of economics in order to provide practical contributions to the literature, and to further the influence of economics in the world of practical affairs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信