{"title":"对随机对照试验进行荟萃分析,比较肠道免疫营养(EIN)和标准肠道营养对胃癌胃切除术患者的生化、免疫和临床疗效,并调查肠道免疫营养配方的证据网络","authors":"Lidan Huang, Qi Zhao, Weihang Li","doi":"10.5114/wiitm.2023.133439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<b>Introduction</b><br/>For patients with gastric cancer who have undergone gastrectomy, recent research has shown that enteral immunonutrition (EIN) is more successful than enteral nutrition (EN) at boosting host immunity and, in turn, improving prognosis. The claimed outcomes, however, are inconsistent.<br/><br/><b>Aim</b><br/>This meta-analysis examines how EIN affects biochemical, immunological, and clinical outcomes for gastrectomy (GC) patients following gastrectomy and EIN formulae evidence networks.<br/><br/><b>Material and methods</b><br/>A comprehensive search of the Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases identified English-language peer-reviewed journal papers. The odds ratio (OR) and standard mean difference (SMD) were calculated, along with their 95% confidence intervals. The heterogeneity was assessed using Cochrane Q and I2 statistics and the appropriate p-value. The analysis used RevMan 5.3.<br/><br/><b>Results</b><br/>This meta-analysis included 10 RCTs involving 1409 GC patients, 714 of whom were assigned to EIN and 695 to EN. After EIN treatment, serum proalbumin, serum transferrin, lymphocyte count, and CD4+/CD8+ ratio had statistically significant standardised mean differences (SMDs) of 2.39, 2.39, 1.34, and 0.72, respectively. EIN reduces postoperative infectious complications with an OR of 0.63 (95% CI: 0.41–0.77) for infections, an OR of 0.63 for complications, and an SMD of –1.05 for systemic inflammations. A network diagram with high-quality data and a well-defined network design with consistent and accurate connection shows that EIN can improve serum protein levels, immunological parameters, and post-operative problems.<br/><br/><b>Conclusions</b><br/>The use of EIN has been shown to enhance cellular immunity, regulate inflammatory response, and decrease postoperative complications in GC patients who underwent major GI surgery.<br/><br/>","PeriodicalId":49361,"journal":{"name":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing enteral immunonutrition (EIN) and standard enteral nutrition regarding biochemical, immunological, and clinical outcomes in gastrectomy patients with gastric cancer and investigating evidence networks for EIN formulae\",\"authors\":\"Lidan Huang, Qi Zhao, Weihang Li\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/wiitm.2023.133439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<b>Introduction</b><br/>For patients with gastric cancer who have undergone gastrectomy, recent research has shown that enteral immunonutrition (EIN) is more successful than enteral nutrition (EN) at boosting host immunity and, in turn, improving prognosis. The claimed outcomes, however, are inconsistent.<br/><br/><b>Aim</b><br/>This meta-analysis examines how EIN affects biochemical, immunological, and clinical outcomes for gastrectomy (GC) patients following gastrectomy and EIN formulae evidence networks.<br/><br/><b>Material and methods</b><br/>A comprehensive search of the Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases identified English-language peer-reviewed journal papers. The odds ratio (OR) and standard mean difference (SMD) were calculated, along with their 95% confidence intervals. The heterogeneity was assessed using Cochrane Q and I2 statistics and the appropriate p-value. The analysis used RevMan 5.3.<br/><br/><b>Results</b><br/>This meta-analysis included 10 RCTs involving 1409 GC patients, 714 of whom were assigned to EIN and 695 to EN. After EIN treatment, serum proalbumin, serum transferrin, lymphocyte count, and CD4+/CD8+ ratio had statistically significant standardised mean differences (SMDs) of 2.39, 2.39, 1.34, and 0.72, respectively. EIN reduces postoperative infectious complications with an OR of 0.63 (95% CI: 0.41–0.77) for infections, an OR of 0.63 for complications, and an SMD of –1.05 for systemic inflammations. A network diagram with high-quality data and a well-defined network design with consistent and accurate connection shows that EIN can improve serum protein levels, immunological parameters, and post-operative problems.<br/><br/><b>Conclusions</b><br/>The use of EIN has been shown to enhance cellular immunity, regulate inflammatory response, and decrease postoperative complications in GC patients who underwent major GI surgery.<br/><br/>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2023.133439\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2023.133439","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing enteral immunonutrition (EIN) and standard enteral nutrition regarding biochemical, immunological, and clinical outcomes in gastrectomy patients with gastric cancer and investigating evidence networks for EIN formulae
Introduction For patients with gastric cancer who have undergone gastrectomy, recent research has shown that enteral immunonutrition (EIN) is more successful than enteral nutrition (EN) at boosting host immunity and, in turn, improving prognosis. The claimed outcomes, however, are inconsistent.
Aim This meta-analysis examines how EIN affects biochemical, immunological, and clinical outcomes for gastrectomy (GC) patients following gastrectomy and EIN formulae evidence networks.
Material and methods A comprehensive search of the Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases identified English-language peer-reviewed journal papers. The odds ratio (OR) and standard mean difference (SMD) were calculated, along with their 95% confidence intervals. The heterogeneity was assessed using Cochrane Q and I2 statistics and the appropriate p-value. The analysis used RevMan 5.3.
Results This meta-analysis included 10 RCTs involving 1409 GC patients, 714 of whom were assigned to EIN and 695 to EN. After EIN treatment, serum proalbumin, serum transferrin, lymphocyte count, and CD4+/CD8+ ratio had statistically significant standardised mean differences (SMDs) of 2.39, 2.39, 1.34, and 0.72, respectively. EIN reduces postoperative infectious complications with an OR of 0.63 (95% CI: 0.41–0.77) for infections, an OR of 0.63 for complications, and an SMD of –1.05 for systemic inflammations. A network diagram with high-quality data and a well-defined network design with consistent and accurate connection shows that EIN can improve serum protein levels, immunological parameters, and post-operative problems.
Conclusions The use of EIN has been shown to enhance cellular immunity, regulate inflammatory response, and decrease postoperative complications in GC patients who underwent major GI surgery.
期刊介绍:
Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques serves as a forum for exchange of multidisciplinary experiences in fields such as: surgery, gynaecology, urology, gastroenterology, neurosurgery, ENT surgery, cardiac surgery, anaesthesiology and radiology, as well as other branches of medicine dealing with miniinvasive techniques.