努力实施基于授权令的内容自我节制

IF 7.1 3区管理学 Q1 BUSINESS

Electronic Markets Pub Date : 2023-12-27 DOI:10.1007/s12525-023-00683-y

Herbert S. Lin

{"title":"努力实施基于授权令的内容自我节制","authors":"Herbert S. Lin","doi":"10.1007/s12525-023-00683-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper recaps the issue of online mis- and disinformation as a societal problem, reviews why government roles in defining mis- and disinformation are constitutionally suspect under First Amendment jurisprudence, and builds on a content-neutral theory of disincentivizing the production of mis- and disinformation first proposed by Marshall Van Alstyne. The purpose of this paper is to develop some key implementation details that would be necessary to resolve if the theory is to be adopted operationally.</p>","PeriodicalId":47719,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Markets","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards implementation of warrant-based content self-moderation\",\"authors\":\"Herbert S. Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12525-023-00683-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper recaps the issue of online mis- and disinformation as a societal problem, reviews why government roles in defining mis- and disinformation are constitutionally suspect under First Amendment jurisprudence, and builds on a content-neutral theory of disincentivizing the production of mis- and disinformation first proposed by Marshall Van Alstyne. The purpose of this paper is to develop some key implementation details that would be necessary to resolve if the theory is to be adopted operationally.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electronic Markets\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electronic Markets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-023-00683-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Markets","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-023-00683-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文回顾了作为一个社会问题的网络错误信息和虚假信息问题，评述了为什么政府在定义错误信息和虚假信息方面的作用在宪法第一修正案的法理下是可疑的，并以马歇尔-范-阿尔斯泰恩（Marshall Van Alstyne）首次提出的抑制错误信息和虚假信息生产的内容中立理论为基础。本文的目的是制定一些关键的实施细节，这些细节是在实际操作中采用该理论时必须解决的问题。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

Towards implementation of warrant-based content self-moderation

查看原文本刊更多论文

Towards implementation of warrant-based content self-moderation

This paper recaps the issue of online mis- and disinformation as a societal problem, reviews why government roles in defining mis- and disinformation are constitutionally suspect under First Amendment jurisprudence, and builds on a content-neutral theory of disincentivizing the production of mis- and disinformation first proposed by Marshall Van Alstyne. The purpose of this paper is to develop some key implementation details that would be necessary to resolve if the theory is to be adopted operationally.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Electronic Markets Multiple-

CiteScore

14.80

自引率

15.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Electronic Markets (EM) stands as a premier academic journal providing a dynamic platform for research into various forms of networked business. Recognizing the pivotal role of information and communication technology (ICT), EM delves into how ICT transforms the interactions between organizations and customers across diverse domains such as social networks, electronic commerce, supply chain management, and customer relationship management. Electronic markets, in essence, encompass the realms of networked business where multiple suppliers and customers engage in economic transactions within single or multiple tiers of economic value chains. This broad concept encompasses various forms, including allocation platforms with dynamic price discovery mechanisms, fostering atomistic relationships. Notable examples originate from financial markets (e.g., CBOT, XETRA) and energy markets (e.g., EEX, ICE). Join us in exploring the multifaceted landscape of electronic markets and their transformative impact on business interactions and dynamics.