开发并验证用于 COVID-19 诊断预测模式的简单风险评分系统。

IF 0.7 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Özge Aydın Güçlü, Ahmet Ursavaş, Gökhan Ocakoğlu, Ezgi Demirdöğen, Nilüfer Aylin Acet Öztürk, Dilara Ömer Topçu, Orkun Eray Terzi, Uğur Önal, Aslı Görek Dilektaşlı, İmran Sağlık, Funda Coşkun, Dane Ediger, Esra Uzaslan, Halis Akalın, Mehmet Karadağ
{"title":"开发并验证用于 COVID-19 诊断预测模式的简单风险评分系统。","authors":"Özge Aydın Güçlü, Ahmet Ursavaş, Gökhan Ocakoğlu, Ezgi Demirdöğen, Nilüfer Aylin Acet Öztürk, Dilara Ömer Topçu, Orkun Eray Terzi, Uğur Önal, Aslı Görek Dilektaşlı, İmran Sağlık, Funda Coşkun, Dane Ediger, Esra Uzaslan, Halis Akalın, Mehmet Karadağ","doi":"10.5578/tt.20239601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In a resource-constrained situation, a clinical risk stratification system can assist in identifying individuals who are at higher risk and should be tested for COVID-19. This study aims to find a predictive scoring model to estimate the COVID-19 diagnosis.\"</p><p><strong>Materials: </strong>Patients who applied to the emergency pandemic clinic between April 2020 and March 2021 were enrolled in this retrospective study. At admission, demographic characteristics, symptoms, comorbid diseases, chest computed tomography (CT), and laboratory findings were all recorded. Development and validation datasets were created. The scoring system was performed using the coefficients of the odds ratios obtained from the multivariable logistic regression analysis.\"</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Among 1187 patients admitted to the hospital, the median age was 58 years old (22-96), and 52.7% were male. In a multivariable analysis, typical radiological findings (OR= 8.47, CI= 5.48-13.10, p< 0.001) and dyspnea (OR= 2.85, CI= 1.71-4.74, p< 0.001) were found to be the two important risk actors for COVID-19 diagnosis, followed by myalgia (OR= 1.80, CI= 1.08- 2.99, p= 0.023), cough (OR= 1.65, CI= 1.16-2.26, p= 0.006) and fatigue symptoms (OR= 1.57, CI= 1.06-2.30, p= 0.023). In our scoring system, dyspnea was scored as 2 points, cough as 1 point, fatigue as 1 point, myalgia as 1 point, and typical radiological findings were scored as 5 points. This scoring system had a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 76.3% for a cut-off value of >2, with a total score of 10 (p< 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The predictive scoring system could accurately predict the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection, which gave clinicians a theoretical basis for devising immediate treatment options. An evaluation of the predictive efficacy of the scoring system necessitates a multi-center investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":45521,"journal":{"name":"Tuberkuloz ve Toraks-Tuberculosis and Thorax","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of a simple risk scoring system for a COVID-19 diagnostic prediction mode.\",\"authors\":\"Özge Aydın Güçlü, Ahmet Ursavaş, Gökhan Ocakoğlu, Ezgi Demirdöğen, Nilüfer Aylin Acet Öztürk, Dilara Ömer Topçu, Orkun Eray Terzi, Uğur Önal, Aslı Görek Dilektaşlı, İmran Sağlık, Funda Coşkun, Dane Ediger, Esra Uzaslan, Halis Akalın, Mehmet Karadağ\",\"doi\":\"10.5578/tt.20239601\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In a resource-constrained situation, a clinical risk stratification system can assist in identifying individuals who are at higher risk and should be tested for COVID-19. This study aims to find a predictive scoring model to estimate the COVID-19 diagnosis.\\\"</p><p><strong>Materials: </strong>Patients who applied to the emergency pandemic clinic between April 2020 and March 2021 were enrolled in this retrospective study. At admission, demographic characteristics, symptoms, comorbid diseases, chest computed tomography (CT), and laboratory findings were all recorded. Development and validation datasets were created. The scoring system was performed using the coefficients of the odds ratios obtained from the multivariable logistic regression analysis.\\\"</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Among 1187 patients admitted to the hospital, the median age was 58 years old (22-96), and 52.7% were male. In a multivariable analysis, typical radiological findings (OR= 8.47, CI= 5.48-13.10, p< 0.001) and dyspnea (OR= 2.85, CI= 1.71-4.74, p< 0.001) were found to be the two important risk actors for COVID-19 diagnosis, followed by myalgia (OR= 1.80, CI= 1.08- 2.99, p= 0.023), cough (OR= 1.65, CI= 1.16-2.26, p= 0.006) and fatigue symptoms (OR= 1.57, CI= 1.06-2.30, p= 0.023). In our scoring system, dyspnea was scored as 2 points, cough as 1 point, fatigue as 1 point, myalgia as 1 point, and typical radiological findings were scored as 5 points. This scoring system had a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 76.3% for a cut-off value of >2, with a total score of 10 (p< 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The predictive scoring system could accurately predict the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection, which gave clinicians a theoretical basis for devising immediate treatment options. An evaluation of the predictive efficacy of the scoring system necessitates a multi-center investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tuberkuloz ve Toraks-Tuberculosis and Thorax\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tuberkuloz ve Toraks-Tuberculosis and Thorax\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5578/tt.20239601\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuberkuloz ve Toraks-Tuberculosis and Thorax","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5578/tt.20239601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:在资源有限的情况下,临床风险分层系统可帮助确定哪些人风险较高,应接受 COVID-19 检测。本研究旨在寻找一种预测评分模型,以估计 COVID-19 诊断结果:这项回顾性研究选取了 2020 年 4 月至 2021 年 3 月期间向紧急流行病门诊申请的患者。入院时,人口统计学特征、症状、合并疾病、胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)和实验室检查结果均被记录在案。建立了开发数据集和验证数据集。评分系统采用多变量逻辑回归分析得出的几率系数:在入院的 1187 名患者中,中位年龄为 58 岁(22-96 岁),52.7% 为男性。在多变量分析中,典型放射学结果(OR= 8.47,CI= 5.48-13.10,P< 0.001)和呼吸困难(OR= 2.85,CI= 1.71-4.74,P< 0.001)是COVID-19诊断的两个重要风险因素,其次是肌痛(OR= 1.80,CI= 1.08-2.99,P= 0.023)、咳嗽(OR= 1.65,CI= 1.16-2.26,P= 0.006)和疲劳症状(OR= 1.57,CI= 1.06-2.30,P= 0.023)。在我们的评分系统中,呼吸困难为 2 分,咳嗽为 1 分,疲劳为 1 分,肌痛为 1 分,典型放射学结果为 5 分。该评分系统的灵敏度为 71%,特异性为 76.3%(临界值>2),总分为 10 分(P< 0.001):预测评分系统能准确预测 COVID-19 感染的诊断,为临床医生制定即时治疗方案提供了理论依据。评估该评分系统的预测效果需要进行多中心调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and validation of a simple risk scoring system for a COVID-19 diagnostic prediction mode.

Introduction: In a resource-constrained situation, a clinical risk stratification system can assist in identifying individuals who are at higher risk and should be tested for COVID-19. This study aims to find a predictive scoring model to estimate the COVID-19 diagnosis."

Materials: Patients who applied to the emergency pandemic clinic between April 2020 and March 2021 were enrolled in this retrospective study. At admission, demographic characteristics, symptoms, comorbid diseases, chest computed tomography (CT), and laboratory findings were all recorded. Development and validation datasets were created. The scoring system was performed using the coefficients of the odds ratios obtained from the multivariable logistic regression analysis."

Result: Among 1187 patients admitted to the hospital, the median age was 58 years old (22-96), and 52.7% were male. In a multivariable analysis, typical radiological findings (OR= 8.47, CI= 5.48-13.10, p< 0.001) and dyspnea (OR= 2.85, CI= 1.71-4.74, p< 0.001) were found to be the two important risk actors for COVID-19 diagnosis, followed by myalgia (OR= 1.80, CI= 1.08- 2.99, p= 0.023), cough (OR= 1.65, CI= 1.16-2.26, p= 0.006) and fatigue symptoms (OR= 1.57, CI= 1.06-2.30, p= 0.023). In our scoring system, dyspnea was scored as 2 points, cough as 1 point, fatigue as 1 point, myalgia as 1 point, and typical radiological findings were scored as 5 points. This scoring system had a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 76.3% for a cut-off value of >2, with a total score of 10 (p< 0.001).

Conclusions: The predictive scoring system could accurately predict the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection, which gave clinicians a theoretical basis for devising immediate treatment options. An evaluation of the predictive efficacy of the scoring system necessitates a multi-center investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信