探索知识组织技术,推进跨学科背痛研究

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
JOR Spine Pub Date : 2023-11-29 DOI:10.1002/jsp2.1300
Jeffrey C. Lotz, Glen Ropella, Paul Anderson, Qian Yang, Michael A. Hedderich, Jeannie Bailey, C. Anthony Hunt
{"title":"探索知识组织技术,推进跨学科背痛研究","authors":"Jeffrey C. Lotz,&nbsp;Glen Ropella,&nbsp;Paul Anderson,&nbsp;Qian Yang,&nbsp;Michael A. Hedderich,&nbsp;Jeannie Bailey,&nbsp;C. Anthony Hunt","doi":"10.1002/jsp2.1300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Chronic low back pain (LBP) is influenced by a broad spectrum of patient-specific factors as codified in domains of the biopsychosocial model (BSM). Operationalizing the BSM into research and clinical care is challenging because most investigators work in silos that concentrate on only one or two BSM domains. Furthermore, the expanding, multidisciplinary nature of BSM research creates practical limitations as to how individual investigators integrate current data into their processes of generating impactful hypotheses. The rapidly advancing field of artificial intelligence (AI) is providing new tools for organizing knowledge, but the practical aspects for how AI may advance LBP research and clinical are beginning to be explored. The goals of the work presented here are to: (1) explore the current capabilities of knowledge integration technologies (large language models (LLM), similarity graphs (SGs), and knowledge graphs (KGs)) to synthesize biomedical literature and depict multimodal relationships reflected in the BSM, and; (2) highlight limitations, implementation details, and future areas of research to improve performance. We demonstrate preliminary evidence that LLMs, like GPT-3, may be useful in helping scientists analyze and distinguish cLBP publications across multiple BSM domains and determine the degree to which the literature supports or contradicts emergent hypotheses. We show that SG representations and KGs enable exploring LBP's literature in novel ways, possibly providing, trans-disciplinary perspectives or insights that are currently difficult, if not infeasible to achieve. The SG approach is automated, simple, and inexpensive to execute, and thereby may be useful for early-phase literature and narrative explorations beyond one's areas of expertise. Likewise, we show that KGs can be constructed using automated pipelines, queried to provide semantic information, and analyzed to explore trans-domain linkages. The examples presented support the feasibility for LBP-tailored AI protocols to organize knowledge and support developing and refining trans-domain hypotheses.</p>","PeriodicalId":14876,"journal":{"name":"JOR Spine","volume":"6 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jsp2.1300","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An exploration of knowledge-organizing technologies to advance transdisciplinary back pain research\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey C. Lotz,&nbsp;Glen Ropella,&nbsp;Paul Anderson,&nbsp;Qian Yang,&nbsp;Michael A. Hedderich,&nbsp;Jeannie Bailey,&nbsp;C. Anthony Hunt\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jsp2.1300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Chronic low back pain (LBP) is influenced by a broad spectrum of patient-specific factors as codified in domains of the biopsychosocial model (BSM). Operationalizing the BSM into research and clinical care is challenging because most investigators work in silos that concentrate on only one or two BSM domains. Furthermore, the expanding, multidisciplinary nature of BSM research creates practical limitations as to how individual investigators integrate current data into their processes of generating impactful hypotheses. The rapidly advancing field of artificial intelligence (AI) is providing new tools for organizing knowledge, but the practical aspects for how AI may advance LBP research and clinical are beginning to be explored. The goals of the work presented here are to: (1) explore the current capabilities of knowledge integration technologies (large language models (LLM), similarity graphs (SGs), and knowledge graphs (KGs)) to synthesize biomedical literature and depict multimodal relationships reflected in the BSM, and; (2) highlight limitations, implementation details, and future areas of research to improve performance. We demonstrate preliminary evidence that LLMs, like GPT-3, may be useful in helping scientists analyze and distinguish cLBP publications across multiple BSM domains and determine the degree to which the literature supports or contradicts emergent hypotheses. We show that SG representations and KGs enable exploring LBP's literature in novel ways, possibly providing, trans-disciplinary perspectives or insights that are currently difficult, if not infeasible to achieve. The SG approach is automated, simple, and inexpensive to execute, and thereby may be useful for early-phase literature and narrative explorations beyond one's areas of expertise. Likewise, we show that KGs can be constructed using automated pipelines, queried to provide semantic information, and analyzed to explore trans-domain linkages. The examples presented support the feasibility for LBP-tailored AI protocols to organize knowledge and support developing and refining trans-domain hypotheses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOR Spine\",\"volume\":\"6 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jsp2.1300\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOR Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsp2.1300\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOR Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsp2.1300","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

慢性腰背痛(LBP)受生物心理社会模型(BSM)各领域中广泛的患者特异性因素的影响。将 BSM 应用于研究和临床治疗具有挑战性,因为大多数研究人员都是各自为战,只专注于一个或两个 BSM 领域。此外,BSM 研究具有不断扩展的多学科性质,这对研究人员如何将当前数据整合到他们提出有影响力假设的过程中造成了实际限制。飞速发展的人工智能(AI)领域为组织知识提供了新的工具,但人工智能如何推动枸杞多糖症研究和临床的实际方面仍有待探索。本文介绍的工作目标是(1) 探索知识整合技术(大型语言模型(LLM)、相似性图(SG)和知识图(KG))在综合生物医学文献和描述 BSM 中反映的多模态关系方面的现有能力;(2) 强调局限性、实施细节和提高性能的未来研究领域。我们展示的初步证据表明,LLM(如 GPT-3)可以帮助科学家分析和区分跨多个 BSM 领域的 cLBP 出版物,并确定文献对新出现的假设的支持或抵触程度。我们的研究表明,SG 表示法和 KG 能够以新颖的方式探索枸杞多糖的文献,并有可能提供跨学科的视角或见解,而这些视角或见解是目前难以实现的,甚至是不可行的。SG 方法自动化程度高、操作简单、成本低廉,因此可能适用于超越个人专业领域的早期文献和叙事探索。同样,我们还展示了可以使用自动流水线构建 KG,通过查询提供语义信息,并通过分析探索跨领域联系。所展示的示例证明了为 LBP 量身定制的人工智能协议在组织知识、支持开发和完善跨领域假设方面的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

An exploration of knowledge-organizing technologies to advance transdisciplinary back pain research

An exploration of knowledge-organizing technologies to advance transdisciplinary back pain research

Chronic low back pain (LBP) is influenced by a broad spectrum of patient-specific factors as codified in domains of the biopsychosocial model (BSM). Operationalizing the BSM into research and clinical care is challenging because most investigators work in silos that concentrate on only one or two BSM domains. Furthermore, the expanding, multidisciplinary nature of BSM research creates practical limitations as to how individual investigators integrate current data into their processes of generating impactful hypotheses. The rapidly advancing field of artificial intelligence (AI) is providing new tools for organizing knowledge, but the practical aspects for how AI may advance LBP research and clinical are beginning to be explored. The goals of the work presented here are to: (1) explore the current capabilities of knowledge integration technologies (large language models (LLM), similarity graphs (SGs), and knowledge graphs (KGs)) to synthesize biomedical literature and depict multimodal relationships reflected in the BSM, and; (2) highlight limitations, implementation details, and future areas of research to improve performance. We demonstrate preliminary evidence that LLMs, like GPT-3, may be useful in helping scientists analyze and distinguish cLBP publications across multiple BSM domains and determine the degree to which the literature supports or contradicts emergent hypotheses. We show that SG representations and KGs enable exploring LBP's literature in novel ways, possibly providing, trans-disciplinary perspectives or insights that are currently difficult, if not infeasible to achieve. The SG approach is automated, simple, and inexpensive to execute, and thereby may be useful for early-phase literature and narrative explorations beyond one's areas of expertise. Likewise, we show that KGs can be constructed using automated pipelines, queried to provide semantic information, and analyzed to explore trans-domain linkages. The examples presented support the feasibility for LBP-tailored AI protocols to organize knowledge and support developing and refining trans-domain hypotheses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JOR Spine
JOR Spine ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
18.90%
发文量
42
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信