超声引导下两种不同椎间距评估位置的比较

IF 0.6 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Feyza Aksu, Ferda Kartufan, Özge Köner, Ayşegül Görmez, Elif Çiğdem Keleş
{"title":"超声引导下两种不同椎间距评估位置的比较","authors":"Feyza Aksu, Ferda Kartufan, Özge Köner, Ayşegül Görmez, Elif Çiğdem Keleş","doi":"10.4274/TJAR.2023.231277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>During neuraxial anaesthesia, correct patient positioning is key for increased block success and (patient) comfort. The aim of this prospective study was to compare the lateral fetal decubitus (LFD) position with the sitting fetal lotus (SFL) regarding interspinous distance, transverse diameters of paravertebral muscles measured with ultrasonography, and patient comfort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty adult participants who could sit cross-legged and had no lumbar anomalies were included in our prospective study. In both SFL and LFD positions, measurements were performed with ultrasonography; in the axial plane, interspinous distance at the level of L4-L5, in the sagittal plan, with the probe slightly tilted, subcutaneous tissue-spinous process depth, and transverse diameters of paravertebral muscles were measured. Stretcher, waist position, and abdominal comfort were scored on a scale of 1 (very bad) to 7 (perfect) with a verbal numeric satisfaction scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interspinous distance was significantly larger in the SFL position than in the LFD position (<i>P</i> < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two positions (<i>P</i> > 0.05) regarding patient comfort. Paravertebral muscle diameters were significantly broader in the SFL position than in the LFD position. The diameter of the left paravertebral muscle in the SFL position (45.8±8.8 mm) was larger than that in the LFD position (43±7.8 mm; <i>P</i> < 0.001). The diameter of the right paravertebral muscle in the SFL position was (47±9 mm) larger than that in the LFD position (43.4±7.6 mm; <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although there was no difference regarding the comfort between the two positions, the interspinous distance was larger in the SFL position than in the LFD position.</p>","PeriodicalId":23353,"journal":{"name":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10758673/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Two Different Positions for Ultrasound-Guided Intervertebral Distance Evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Feyza Aksu, Ferda Kartufan, Özge Köner, Ayşegül Görmez, Elif Çiğdem Keleş\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/TJAR.2023.231277\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>During neuraxial anaesthesia, correct patient positioning is key for increased block success and (patient) comfort. The aim of this prospective study was to compare the lateral fetal decubitus (LFD) position with the sitting fetal lotus (SFL) regarding interspinous distance, transverse diameters of paravertebral muscles measured with ultrasonography, and patient comfort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty adult participants who could sit cross-legged and had no lumbar anomalies were included in our prospective study. In both SFL and LFD positions, measurements were performed with ultrasonography; in the axial plane, interspinous distance at the level of L4-L5, in the sagittal plan, with the probe slightly tilted, subcutaneous tissue-spinous process depth, and transverse diameters of paravertebral muscles were measured. Stretcher, waist position, and abdominal comfort were scored on a scale of 1 (very bad) to 7 (perfect) with a verbal numeric satisfaction scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interspinous distance was significantly larger in the SFL position than in the LFD position (<i>P</i> < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two positions (<i>P</i> > 0.05) regarding patient comfort. Paravertebral muscle diameters were significantly broader in the SFL position than in the LFD position. The diameter of the left paravertebral muscle in the SFL position (45.8±8.8 mm) was larger than that in the LFD position (43±7.8 mm; <i>P</i> < 0.001). The diameter of the right paravertebral muscle in the SFL position was (47±9 mm) larger than that in the LFD position (43.4±7.6 mm; <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although there was no difference regarding the comfort between the two positions, the interspinous distance was larger in the SFL position than in the LFD position.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10758673/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/TJAR.2023.231277\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/TJAR.2023.231277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在神经麻醉过程中,正确的患者体位是提高阻滞成功率和(患者)舒适度的关键。本前瞻性研究的目的是比较胎儿侧卧位(LFD)与胎儿莲花坐位(SFL)在棘间距、超声波测量的椎旁肌肉横径和患者舒适度方面的差异:我们的前瞻性研究纳入了 50 名可以盘腿而坐且无腰椎异常的成年参与者。在 SFL 和 LFD 两种体位下,使用超声波进行测量;在轴向平面上,测量 L4-L5 水平的棘间距离;在矢状平面上,在探头略微倾斜的情况下,测量皮下组织-棘突深度以及椎旁肌肉的横向直径。对担架、腰部位置和腹部舒适度进行评分,满意度从1分(非常差)到7分(完美)不等:结果:SFL 体位的棘间距离明显大于 LFD 体位(P < 0.05)。两种体位在患者舒适度方面无明显差异(P > 0.05)。SFL体位下的椎旁肌肉直径明显比LFD体位下的宽。SFL 体位下左侧椎旁肌的直径(45.8±8.8 毫米)大于 LFD 体位下的左侧椎旁肌(43±7.8 毫米;P < 0.001)。SFL体位下的右侧椎旁肌直径(47±9 mm)大于LFD体位下的右侧椎旁肌(43.4±7.6 mm;P < 0.001):结论:虽然两种体位的舒适度没有差异,但SFL体位的棘间距离大于LFD体位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Two Different Positions for Ultrasound-Guided Intervertebral Distance Evaluation.

Objective: During neuraxial anaesthesia, correct patient positioning is key for increased block success and (patient) comfort. The aim of this prospective study was to compare the lateral fetal decubitus (LFD) position with the sitting fetal lotus (SFL) regarding interspinous distance, transverse diameters of paravertebral muscles measured with ultrasonography, and patient comfort.

Methods: Fifty adult participants who could sit cross-legged and had no lumbar anomalies were included in our prospective study. In both SFL and LFD positions, measurements were performed with ultrasonography; in the axial plane, interspinous distance at the level of L4-L5, in the sagittal plan, with the probe slightly tilted, subcutaneous tissue-spinous process depth, and transverse diameters of paravertebral muscles were measured. Stretcher, waist position, and abdominal comfort were scored on a scale of 1 (very bad) to 7 (perfect) with a verbal numeric satisfaction scale.

Results: Interspinous distance was significantly larger in the SFL position than in the LFD position (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two positions (P > 0.05) regarding patient comfort. Paravertebral muscle diameters were significantly broader in the SFL position than in the LFD position. The diameter of the left paravertebral muscle in the SFL position (45.8±8.8 mm) was larger than that in the LFD position (43±7.8 mm; P < 0.001). The diameter of the right paravertebral muscle in the SFL position was (47±9 mm) larger than that in the LFD position (43.4±7.6 mm; P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Although there was no difference regarding the comfort between the two positions, the interspinous distance was larger in the SFL position than in the LFD position.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信