硬膜外注射右美托咪定和地塞米松对胸外科术后疼痛、镇痛需求、炎症和氧化应激的影响。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Acta Pharmaceutica Pub Date : 2023-12-26 Print Date: 2023-12-01 DOI:10.2478/acph-2023-0040
Jasminka Peršec, Andrej Šribar, Monika Ilić, Ivan Mamić, Domagoj Kifer, Ana-Marija Domijan, Željan Maleš, Petra Turčić
{"title":"硬膜外注射右美托咪定和地塞米松对胸外科术后疼痛、镇痛需求、炎症和氧化应激的影响。","authors":"Jasminka Peršec, Andrej Šribar, Monika Ilić, Ivan Mamić, Domagoj Kifer, Ana-Marija Domijan, Željan Maleš, Petra Turčić","doi":"10.2478/acph-2023-0040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to compare the effects of dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone as adjuvants to preoperative epidural administration of local anesthetic (ropivacaine) in thoracic surgery on the postoperative level of pain, use of analgesics, inflammation, and oxidative stress. The study enrolled 42 patients who underwent elective thoracic surgery in a one-year period at the University Hospital Dubrava (Zagreb, Croatia). Based on a computer-generated randomization list the patients were assigned to the dexmedetomidine (<i>n</i> = 18) or dexamethasone (<i>n</i> = 24) group. Postoperatively, patients of dexmedetomidine group reported lower pain (VAS value 1 h post surgery, 3.4 ± 2.7 <i>vs.</i> 5.4 ± 1.8, dexmedetomidine <i>vs.</i> dexamethasone, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and had lower anal-gesic requirements in comparison with dexamethasone group. Thus, dexmedetomidine in comparison with dexamethasone was more efficient in lowering pain and analgesia requirements 24 h after the surgery. On the contrary, dexamethasone had better anti-inflammatory properties (CRP level 24 h post surgery, 131.9 ± 90.7 <i>vs.</i> 26.0 ± 55.2 mg L<sup>-1</sup>, dexmedetomidine <i>vs.</i> dexamethasone, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Both dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone exhibited antioxidant effects, however, their antioxidant properties should be further explored. The results of this study improve current knowledge of pain control in thoracic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":7034,"journal":{"name":"Acta Pharmaceutica","volume":"73 4","pages":"691-708"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of epidurally administered dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone on postoperative pain, analgesic requirements, inflammation, and oxidative stress in thoracic surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Jasminka Peršec, Andrej Šribar, Monika Ilić, Ivan Mamić, Domagoj Kifer, Ana-Marija Domijan, Željan Maleš, Petra Turčić\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/acph-2023-0040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to compare the effects of dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone as adjuvants to preoperative epidural administration of local anesthetic (ropivacaine) in thoracic surgery on the postoperative level of pain, use of analgesics, inflammation, and oxidative stress. The study enrolled 42 patients who underwent elective thoracic surgery in a one-year period at the University Hospital Dubrava (Zagreb, Croatia). Based on a computer-generated randomization list the patients were assigned to the dexmedetomidine (<i>n</i> = 18) or dexamethasone (<i>n</i> = 24) group. Postoperatively, patients of dexmedetomidine group reported lower pain (VAS value 1 h post surgery, 3.4 ± 2.7 <i>vs.</i> 5.4 ± 1.8, dexmedetomidine <i>vs.</i> dexamethasone, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and had lower anal-gesic requirements in comparison with dexamethasone group. Thus, dexmedetomidine in comparison with dexamethasone was more efficient in lowering pain and analgesia requirements 24 h after the surgery. On the contrary, dexamethasone had better anti-inflammatory properties (CRP level 24 h post surgery, 131.9 ± 90.7 <i>vs.</i> 26.0 ± 55.2 mg L<sup>-1</sup>, dexmedetomidine <i>vs.</i> dexamethasone, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Both dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone exhibited antioxidant effects, however, their antioxidant properties should be further explored. The results of this study improve current knowledge of pain control in thoracic surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Pharmaceutica\",\"volume\":\"73 4\",\"pages\":\"691-708\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Pharmaceutica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/acph-2023-0040\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Pharmaceutica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/acph-2023-0040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在比较右美托咪定和地塞米松作为胸外科手术术前硬膜外注射局麻药(罗哌卡因)的辅助用药对术后疼痛程度、镇痛药使用、炎症和氧化应激的影响。该研究共招募了 42 名患者,他们在一年内接受了杜布拉瓦大学医院(克罗地亚萨格勒布)的择期胸外科手术。根据计算机生成的随机名单,患者被分配到右美托咪定组(18 人)或地塞米松组(24 人)。与地塞米松组相比,右美托咪定组患者术后疼痛较轻(术后1小时VAS值,3.4 ± 2.7 vs. 5.4 ± 1.8,右美托咪定 vs. 地塞米松,p < 0.01),肛门镇痛需求也较低。因此,与地塞米松相比,右美托咪定能更有效地降低术后24小时的疼痛和镇痛需求。相反,地塞米松具有更好的抗炎特性(术后 24 小时 CRP 水平,131.9 ± 90.7 vs. 26.0 ± 55.2 mg L-1,右美托咪定 vs. 地塞米松,p < 0.01)。右美托咪定和地塞米松都具有抗氧化作用,但它们的抗氧化特性还需进一步研究。本研究的结果提高了目前对胸外科疼痛控制的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of epidurally administered dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone on postoperative pain, analgesic requirements, inflammation, and oxidative stress in thoracic surgery.

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone as adjuvants to preoperative epidural administration of local anesthetic (ropivacaine) in thoracic surgery on the postoperative level of pain, use of analgesics, inflammation, and oxidative stress. The study enrolled 42 patients who underwent elective thoracic surgery in a one-year period at the University Hospital Dubrava (Zagreb, Croatia). Based on a computer-generated randomization list the patients were assigned to the dexmedetomidine (n = 18) or dexamethasone (n = 24) group. Postoperatively, patients of dexmedetomidine group reported lower pain (VAS value 1 h post surgery, 3.4 ± 2.7 vs. 5.4 ± 1.8, dexmedetomidine vs. dexamethasone, p < 0.01) and had lower anal-gesic requirements in comparison with dexamethasone group. Thus, dexmedetomidine in comparison with dexamethasone was more efficient in lowering pain and analgesia requirements 24 h after the surgery. On the contrary, dexamethasone had better anti-inflammatory properties (CRP level 24 h post surgery, 131.9 ± 90.7 vs. 26.0 ± 55.2 mg L-1, dexmedetomidine vs. dexamethasone, p < 0.01). Both dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone exhibited antioxidant effects, however, their antioxidant properties should be further explored. The results of this study improve current knowledge of pain control in thoracic surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Pharmaceutica
Acta Pharmaceutica PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.60%
发文量
20
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: AP is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to pharmaceutical and allied sciences and contains articles predominantly on core biomedical and health subjects. The aim of AP is to increase the impact of pharmaceutical research in academia, industry and laboratories. With strong emphasis on quality and originality, AP publishes reports from the discovery of a drug up to clinical practice. Topics covered are: analytics, biochemistry, biopharmaceutics, biotechnology, cell biology, cell cultures, clinical pharmacy, drug design, drug delivery, drug disposition, drug stability, gene technology, medicine (including diagnostics and therapy), medicinal chemistry, metabolism, molecular modeling, pharmacology (clinical and animal), peptide and protein chemistry, pharmacognosy, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacoeconomics, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, protein design, radiopharmaceuticals, and toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信