评估美国确定同种免疫妊娠胎儿风险的建议:是时候更新已有几十年历史的做法了吗?

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Elizabeth Abels , Brian D. Adkins , Koraima Cedeno , Garrett S. Booth , Elizabeth S. Allen , Laura D. Stephens , Jennifer S. Woo , Christopher A. Tormey , Jeremy W. Jacobs
{"title":"评估美国确定同种免疫妊娠胎儿风险的建议:是时候更新已有几十年历史的做法了吗?","authors":"Elizabeth Abels ,&nbsp;Brian D. Adkins ,&nbsp;Koraima Cedeno ,&nbsp;Garrett S. Booth ,&nbsp;Elizabeth S. Allen ,&nbsp;Laura D. Stephens ,&nbsp;Jennifer S. Woo ,&nbsp;Christopher A. Tormey ,&nbsp;Jeremy W. Jacobs","doi":"10.1016/j.tmrv.2023.150810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The current recommended testing algorithm for assessing the alloimmunized pregnancy utilized by many obstetricians in the United States (US) fails to consider the most recent evidence, placing fetuses, and mothers at unnecessary risk of poor outcome or death. This narrative review of the current landscape of fetal red blood cell (RBC) antigen testing evaluates the history of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) and how its discovery has continued to influence practices in the US today. We compare current US-based HDFN practice guidelines with those in Europe. We also provide transfusion medicine and hematology perspectives and recommendations addressing the limitations of US practice, particularly regarding paternal RBC antigen testing, and discuss the most valuable alternatives based on decades of data and evidence-based recommendations from Europe.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56081,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine Reviews","volume":"38 2","pages":"Article 150810"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Recommendations for Determining Fetal Risk in Alloimmunized Pregnancies in the United States: Is It Time to Update a Decades-Old Practice?\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Abels ,&nbsp;Brian D. Adkins ,&nbsp;Koraima Cedeno ,&nbsp;Garrett S. Booth ,&nbsp;Elizabeth S. Allen ,&nbsp;Laura D. Stephens ,&nbsp;Jennifer S. Woo ,&nbsp;Christopher A. Tormey ,&nbsp;Jeremy W. Jacobs\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tmrv.2023.150810\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The current recommended testing algorithm for assessing the alloimmunized pregnancy utilized by many obstetricians in the United States (US) fails to consider the most recent evidence, placing fetuses, and mothers at unnecessary risk of poor outcome or death. This narrative review of the current landscape of fetal red blood cell (RBC) antigen testing evaluates the history of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) and how its discovery has continued to influence practices in the US today. We compare current US-based HDFN practice guidelines with those in Europe. We also provide transfusion medicine and hematology perspectives and recommendations addressing the limitations of US practice, particularly regarding paternal RBC antigen testing, and discuss the most valuable alternatives based on decades of data and evidence-based recommendations from Europe.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion Medicine Reviews\",\"volume\":\"38 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 150810\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion Medicine Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887796323001001\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Medicine Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887796323001001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国许多产科医生目前推荐的评估同种免疫妊娠的检测算法没有考虑最新的证据,使胎儿和母亲面临不必要的不良结局或死亡风险。这篇关于胎儿红细胞(RBC)抗原检测现状的叙述性综述评估了胎儿和新生儿溶血病(HDFN)的历史,以及其发现如何持续影响当今美国的临床实践。我们比较了目前美国与欧洲的 HDFN 实践指南。我们还提供了输血医学和血液学方面的观点和建议,以解决美国实践中的局限性,尤其是有关父系红细胞抗原检测的问题,并根据欧洲数十年的数据和循证建议讨论了最有价值的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing Recommendations for Determining Fetal Risk in Alloimmunized Pregnancies in the United States: Is It Time to Update a Decades-Old Practice?

The current recommended testing algorithm for assessing the alloimmunized pregnancy utilized by many obstetricians in the United States (US) fails to consider the most recent evidence, placing fetuses, and mothers at unnecessary risk of poor outcome or death. This narrative review of the current landscape of fetal red blood cell (RBC) antigen testing evaluates the history of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) and how its discovery has continued to influence practices in the US today. We compare current US-based HDFN practice guidelines with those in Europe. We also provide transfusion medicine and hematology perspectives and recommendations addressing the limitations of US practice, particularly regarding paternal RBC antigen testing, and discuss the most valuable alternatives based on decades of data and evidence-based recommendations from Europe.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transfusion Medicine Reviews
Transfusion Medicine Reviews 医学-血液学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Transfusion Medicine Reviews provides an international forum in English for the publication of scholarly work devoted to the various sub-disciplines that comprise Transfusion Medicine including hemostasis and thrombosis and cellular therapies. The scope of the journal encompasses basic science, practical aspects, laboratory developments, clinical indications, and adverse effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信