二分法

Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.2478/saec-2023-0015

I. Narița

{"title":"二分法","authors":"I. Narița","doi":"10.2478/saec-2023-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Among Zeno paradoxes the most known are Dichotomy, Achilles, Arrow, and Stadium. These argumentations state that movement is impossible since it is not thinkable. According to the ascendant form of dichotomy, a mobile cannot touch its destination since it always must to reach the half of the distance. The solutions of Diogenes, Aristotle and mathematical analysis are not satisfactory. Finally, the difference between rest and movement can be only conventionally established.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dichotomy\",\"authors\":\"I. Narița\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/saec-2023-0015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Among Zeno paradoxes the most known are Dichotomy, Achilles, Arrow, and Stadium. These argumentations state that movement is impossible since it is not thinkable. According to the ascendant form of dichotomy, a mobile cannot touch its destination since it always must to reach the half of the distance. The solutions of Diogenes, Aristotle and mathematical analysis are not satisfactory. Finally, the difference between rest and movement can be only conventionally established.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/saec-2023-0015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/saec-2023-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要芝诺悖论中最著名的是二分法、阿基里斯悖论、箭头悖论和体育场悖论。这些论证指出，移动是不可能的，因为它是不可想象的。根据二分法的上升形式，移动不可能到达目的地，因为它总是必须到达距离的一半。第欧根尼、亚里士多德和数学分析的解决方案都不能令人满意。最后，静止和运动之间的区别只能按常规来确定。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

Dichotomy

Abstract Among Zeno paradoxes the most known are Dichotomy, Achilles, Arrow, and Stadium. These argumentations state that movement is impossible since it is not thinkable. According to the ascendant form of dichotomy, a mobile cannot touch its destination since it always must to reach the half of the distance. The solutions of Diogenes, Aristotle and mathematical analysis are not satisfactory. Finally, the difference between rest and movement can be only conventionally established.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助