中国网络诽谤罪的认定及诉讼程序适用研究

Xinhui Gong, Luyao Ma
{"title":"中国网络诽谤罪的认定及诉讼程序适用研究","authors":"Xinhui Gong, Luyao Ma","doi":"10.56397/slj.2023.12.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the incrimination standards of “serious circumstance” of the crime of cyber defamation in Chinese criminal law, distorted data should be excluded from the “quantity standard” and the “quantity standard” should be used only as an auxiliary judgment standard. The “social order” and “the state’s interests” involved as the conditions for public prosecution should be correctly defined, and the simple disturbances of cyberspace order and psychological order cannot be recognized as “seriously undermine social order”. As the landing point of many applicable public prosecution situations, the “adverse social impact” cannot be interpreted through the system to arrive at “seriously undermine social order”. In defamation cases against public figures, the public’s right to freedom of expression and supervision should be taken into account, as well as the public figure’s ability to control social resources. In terms of the applications of litigation procedures, a correct interpretation should be made of the principle of “be investigated only if they are sued”, and the responsibility of public security organs to assist in providing evidence should be implemented. For general cases of cyber defamation, the principle of “be investigated only if they are sued” should be sticked with, and when meeting the conditions for the application of the public prosecution procedures, interests should be weighed between the protection of the public interest and respect for the victim’s wishes, so as to achieve an accurate grasp of the state’s right to public prosecution.","PeriodicalId":377631,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Law and Justice","volume":"112 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study on the Determination and the Litigation Procedure Application of the Crime of Cyber Defamation in China\",\"authors\":\"Xinhui Gong, Luyao Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.56397/slj.2023.12.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the incrimination standards of “serious circumstance” of the crime of cyber defamation in Chinese criminal law, distorted data should be excluded from the “quantity standard” and the “quantity standard” should be used only as an auxiliary judgment standard. The “social order” and “the state’s interests” involved as the conditions for public prosecution should be correctly defined, and the simple disturbances of cyberspace order and psychological order cannot be recognized as “seriously undermine social order”. As the landing point of many applicable public prosecution situations, the “adverse social impact” cannot be interpreted through the system to arrive at “seriously undermine social order”. In defamation cases against public figures, the public’s right to freedom of expression and supervision should be taken into account, as well as the public figure’s ability to control social resources. In terms of the applications of litigation procedures, a correct interpretation should be made of the principle of “be investigated only if they are sued”, and the responsibility of public security organs to assist in providing evidence should be implemented. For general cases of cyber defamation, the principle of “be investigated only if they are sued” should be sticked with, and when meeting the conditions for the application of the public prosecution procedures, interests should be weighed between the protection of the public interest and respect for the victim’s wishes, so as to achieve an accurate grasp of the state’s right to public prosecution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":377631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Law and Justice\",\"volume\":\"112 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Law and Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56397/slj.2023.12.09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Law and Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56397/slj.2023.12.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在我国刑法网络诽谤罪 "情节严重 "的入罪标准中,篡改数据应排除在 "数量标准 "之外,"数量标准 "只能作为辅助判断标准。要正确界定公诉条件所涉及的 "社会秩序 "和 "国家利益",不能将简单的扰乱网络空间秩序和心理秩序认定为 "严重破坏社会秩序"。作为诸多公诉适用情形的落脚点,"社会不良影响 "并不能通过制度解释得出 "严重破坏社会秩序"。在针对公众人物的诽谤案件中,既要考虑公众的言论自由权和监督权,也要考虑公众人物对社会资源的掌控能力。在诉讼程序的适用上,应正确理解 "有诉必查 "的原则,落实公安机关的协助取证责任。对于一般的网络诽谤案件,应当坚持 "有诉必查 "的原则,在符合公诉程序适用条件时,应当在维护公共利益与尊重受害人意愿之间进行利益权衡,做到对国家公诉权的准确把握。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Study on the Determination and the Litigation Procedure Application of the Crime of Cyber Defamation in China
In the incrimination standards of “serious circumstance” of the crime of cyber defamation in Chinese criminal law, distorted data should be excluded from the “quantity standard” and the “quantity standard” should be used only as an auxiliary judgment standard. The “social order” and “the state’s interests” involved as the conditions for public prosecution should be correctly defined, and the simple disturbances of cyberspace order and psychological order cannot be recognized as “seriously undermine social order”. As the landing point of many applicable public prosecution situations, the “adverse social impact” cannot be interpreted through the system to arrive at “seriously undermine social order”. In defamation cases against public figures, the public’s right to freedom of expression and supervision should be taken into account, as well as the public figure’s ability to control social resources. In terms of the applications of litigation procedures, a correct interpretation should be made of the principle of “be investigated only if they are sued”, and the responsibility of public security organs to assist in providing evidence should be implemented. For general cases of cyber defamation, the principle of “be investigated only if they are sued” should be sticked with, and when meeting the conditions for the application of the public prosecution procedures, interests should be weighed between the protection of the public interest and respect for the victim’s wishes, so as to achieve an accurate grasp of the state’s right to public prosecution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信