带测试的多处理器调度近似算法,最小化总作业完成时间

IF 0.9 4区 计算机科学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Mingyang Gong, Zhi-Zhong Chen, Kuniteru Hayashi
{"title":"带测试的多处理器调度近似算法,最小化总作业完成时间","authors":"Mingyang Gong,&nbsp;Zhi-Zhong Chen,&nbsp;Kuniteru Hayashi","doi":"10.1007/s00453-023-01198-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In offline scheduling models, jobs are given with their exact processing times. In their online counterparts, jobs arrive in sequence together with their processing times and the scheduler makes irrevocable decisions on how to execute each of them upon its arrival. We consider a semi-online variant which has equally rich application background, called scheduling with testing, where the exact processing time of a job is revealed only after a required testing operation is finished, or otherwise the job has to be executed for a given possibly over-estimated length of time. For multiprocessor scheduling with testing to minimize the total job completion time, we present several first approximation algorithms with constant competitive ratios for various settings, including a <span>\\(2 \\varphi \\)</span>-competitive algorithm for the non-preemptive general testing case and a <span>\\((0.0382 + 2.7925 (1 - \\frac{1}{2\\,m}))\\)</span>-competitive randomized algorithm, when the number of machines <span>\\(m \\ge 37\\)</span> or otherwise 2.7925-competitive, where <span>\\(\\varphi = (1 + \\sqrt{5}) / 2 &lt; 1.6181\\)</span> is the golden ratio and <i>m</i> is the number of machines, a <span>\\((3.5 - \\frac{3}{2\\,m})\\)</span>-competitive algorithm allowing job preemption when <span>\\(m \\ge 3\\)</span> or otherwise 3-competitive, and a <span>\\((\\varphi + \\frac{\\varphi + 1}{2} (1 - \\frac{1}{\\,}m))\\)</span>-competitive algorithm for the non-preemptive uniform testing case when <span>\\(m \\ge 5\\)</span> or otherwise <span>\\((\\varphi + 1)\\)</span>-competitive. Our results improve three previous best approximation algorithms for the single machine scheduling with testing problems, respectively.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50824,"journal":{"name":"Algorithmica","volume":"86 5","pages":"1400 - 1427"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Approximation Algorithms for Multiprocessor Scheduling with Testing to Minimize the Total Job Completion Time\",\"authors\":\"Mingyang Gong,&nbsp;Zhi-Zhong Chen,&nbsp;Kuniteru Hayashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00453-023-01198-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In offline scheduling models, jobs are given with their exact processing times. In their online counterparts, jobs arrive in sequence together with their processing times and the scheduler makes irrevocable decisions on how to execute each of them upon its arrival. We consider a semi-online variant which has equally rich application background, called scheduling with testing, where the exact processing time of a job is revealed only after a required testing operation is finished, or otherwise the job has to be executed for a given possibly over-estimated length of time. For multiprocessor scheduling with testing to minimize the total job completion time, we present several first approximation algorithms with constant competitive ratios for various settings, including a <span>\\\\(2 \\\\varphi \\\\)</span>-competitive algorithm for the non-preemptive general testing case and a <span>\\\\((0.0382 + 2.7925 (1 - \\\\frac{1}{2\\\\,m}))\\\\)</span>-competitive randomized algorithm, when the number of machines <span>\\\\(m \\\\ge 37\\\\)</span> or otherwise 2.7925-competitive, where <span>\\\\(\\\\varphi = (1 + \\\\sqrt{5}) / 2 &lt; 1.6181\\\\)</span> is the golden ratio and <i>m</i> is the number of machines, a <span>\\\\((3.5 - \\\\frac{3}{2\\\\,m})\\\\)</span>-competitive algorithm allowing job preemption when <span>\\\\(m \\\\ge 3\\\\)</span> or otherwise 3-competitive, and a <span>\\\\((\\\\varphi + \\\\frac{\\\\varphi + 1}{2} (1 - \\\\frac{1}{\\\\,}m))\\\\)</span>-competitive algorithm for the non-preemptive uniform testing case when <span>\\\\(m \\\\ge 5\\\\)</span> or otherwise <span>\\\\((\\\\varphi + 1)\\\\)</span>-competitive. Our results improve three previous best approximation algorithms for the single machine scheduling with testing problems, respectively.\\n</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Algorithmica\",\"volume\":\"86 5\",\"pages\":\"1400 - 1427\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Algorithmica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00453-023-01198-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Algorithmica","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00453-023-01198-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 在离线调度模型中,作业都有准确的处理时间。而在在线调度模型中,作业会连同它们的处理时间依次到达,调度员会在作业到达后不可更改地决定如何执行每个作业。在这种情况下,只有在所需的测试操作完成后,作业的确切处理时间才会被告知,否则作业就必须在给定的可能高估的时间内执行。对于带测试的多处理器调度,为了最小化总作业完成时间,我们提出了几种在不同情况下具有恒定竞争比的第一近似算法,其中包括针对非抢占式一般测试情况的(2)竞争算法和(0.0382 + 2.7925 (1 - \frac{1}{2\,m}) )竞争随机算法。-竞争性随机算法,当机器数量为(m \ge 37\ )或否则为 2.7925-竞争性时,其中 \(\varphi = (1 + \sqrt{5}) / 2 < 1.6181\) 是黄金比率,m 是机器数量,一个((3.5 - \frac{3}{2\,m} )/)-竞争性算法。-竞争算法允许工作抢先,当(m)或其他情况下是3竞争,以及一个(((varphi + (frac{1}{2}(1 - (frac{1}{m})))竞争算法。-当 \(m \ge 5\) 或否则 \((\varphi + 1)\) 时,针对非抢占式统一测试情况的-竞争性算法。-具有竞争性。我们的结果分别改进了之前针对单机调度与测试问题的三种最佳近似算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Approximation Algorithms for Multiprocessor Scheduling with Testing to Minimize the Total Job Completion Time

Approximation Algorithms for Multiprocessor Scheduling with Testing to Minimize the Total Job Completion Time

In offline scheduling models, jobs are given with their exact processing times. In their online counterparts, jobs arrive in sequence together with their processing times and the scheduler makes irrevocable decisions on how to execute each of them upon its arrival. We consider a semi-online variant which has equally rich application background, called scheduling with testing, where the exact processing time of a job is revealed only after a required testing operation is finished, or otherwise the job has to be executed for a given possibly over-estimated length of time. For multiprocessor scheduling with testing to minimize the total job completion time, we present several first approximation algorithms with constant competitive ratios for various settings, including a \(2 \varphi \)-competitive algorithm for the non-preemptive general testing case and a \((0.0382 + 2.7925 (1 - \frac{1}{2\,m}))\)-competitive randomized algorithm, when the number of machines \(m \ge 37\) or otherwise 2.7925-competitive, where \(\varphi = (1 + \sqrt{5}) / 2 < 1.6181\) is the golden ratio and m is the number of machines, a \((3.5 - \frac{3}{2\,m})\)-competitive algorithm allowing job preemption when \(m \ge 3\) or otherwise 3-competitive, and a \((\varphi + \frac{\varphi + 1}{2} (1 - \frac{1}{\,}m))\)-competitive algorithm for the non-preemptive uniform testing case when \(m \ge 5\) or otherwise \((\varphi + 1)\)-competitive. Our results improve three previous best approximation algorithms for the single machine scheduling with testing problems, respectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Algorithmica
Algorithmica 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
158
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Algorithmica is an international journal which publishes theoretical papers on algorithms that address problems arising in practical areas, and experimental papers of general appeal for practical importance or techniques. The development of algorithms is an integral part of computer science. The increasing complexity and scope of computer applications makes the design of efficient algorithms essential. Algorithmica covers algorithms in applied areas such as: VLSI, distributed computing, parallel processing, automated design, robotics, graphics, data base design, software tools, as well as algorithms in fundamental areas such as sorting, searching, data structures, computational geometry, and linear programming. In addition, the journal features two special sections: Application Experience, presenting findings obtained from applications of theoretical results to practical situations, and Problems, offering short papers presenting problems on selected topics of computer science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信