在 COVID-19 大流行期间恢复亲自护理期间对青光眼患者实施风险分层护理 - 初步研究。

Q2 Medicine
Cristina Nery Carbajo, Glaucia Luciano da Veiga, Rodrigo Toledo Mota, Fernando Luiz Affonso Fonseca, Vagner Loduca Lima
{"title":"在 COVID-19 大流行期间恢复亲自护理期间对青光眼患者实施风险分层护理 - 初步研究。","authors":"Cristina Nery Carbajo, Glaucia Luciano da Veiga, Rodrigo Toledo Mota, Fernando Luiz Affonso Fonseca, Vagner Loduca Lima","doi":"10.36311/jhgd.v33.14480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: the COVID-19 pandemic sparked a serious health crisis in which non-essential medical services were suspended, with the management of serious diseases not related to the pandemic, including glaucoma, becoming secondary in importance. With the flexibilization of social isolation measures, resuming outpatient care was necessary, respecting the health equity provided by the Brazilian Unified Health System.\nObjective: to describe a risk classification of glaucoma progression based on clinical ophthalmology criteria during the COVID-19 pandemic.\nMethods: observational study of an administrative nature. A review was carried out of the medical records of patients who had scheduled appointments between March and September of 2020 in the glaucoma sector of the FMABC University Center’s Department of Ophthalmology. A total of 489 medical records (881 eyes) were reviewed, and patients were divided into 4 groups according to the risk of glaucoma progression. Eyes were evaluated for visual acuity (VA), optic disc cup, pachymetry, intraocular pressure (IOP), mean number of eyes drop medications used, and global visual field indexes.\nResults: groups were homogeneous in terms of age (mean 67.04 ± 11.72 years) and sex (55.5% women and 44.5% men). Primary open-angle glaucoma was the most prevalent etiology, present in 45.2% of patients, followed by primary angle-closure glaucoma in 15.7%. The groups were compared with each other, and a statistical difference (p<0.005) was found in 04 of the 08 aspects analyzed: VA, optic disc cup, IOP and mean number of eyes drop medications used.\nConclusion: the risk classification for progression proposed in this study was easily applied and aided managers in prioritizing the most serious care during the COVID-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":35218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Growth and Development","volume":"352 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of risk stratification for the care of glaucoma patients during the resumption of in-person care during the COVID-19 pandemic – a preliminary study.\",\"authors\":\"Cristina Nery Carbajo, Glaucia Luciano da Veiga, Rodrigo Toledo Mota, Fernando Luiz Affonso Fonseca, Vagner Loduca Lima\",\"doi\":\"10.36311/jhgd.v33.14480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: the COVID-19 pandemic sparked a serious health crisis in which non-essential medical services were suspended, with the management of serious diseases not related to the pandemic, including glaucoma, becoming secondary in importance. With the flexibilization of social isolation measures, resuming outpatient care was necessary, respecting the health equity provided by the Brazilian Unified Health System.\\nObjective: to describe a risk classification of glaucoma progression based on clinical ophthalmology criteria during the COVID-19 pandemic.\\nMethods: observational study of an administrative nature. A review was carried out of the medical records of patients who had scheduled appointments between March and September of 2020 in the glaucoma sector of the FMABC University Center’s Department of Ophthalmology. A total of 489 medical records (881 eyes) were reviewed, and patients were divided into 4 groups according to the risk of glaucoma progression. Eyes were evaluated for visual acuity (VA), optic disc cup, pachymetry, intraocular pressure (IOP), mean number of eyes drop medications used, and global visual field indexes.\\nResults: groups were homogeneous in terms of age (mean 67.04 ± 11.72 years) and sex (55.5% women and 44.5% men). Primary open-angle glaucoma was the most prevalent etiology, present in 45.2% of patients, followed by primary angle-closure glaucoma in 15.7%. The groups were compared with each other, and a statistical difference (p<0.005) was found in 04 of the 08 aspects analyzed: VA, optic disc cup, IOP and mean number of eyes drop medications used.\\nConclusion: the risk classification for progression proposed in this study was easily applied and aided managers in prioritizing the most serious care during the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Growth and Development\",\"volume\":\"352 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Growth and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36311/jhgd.v33.14480\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Growth and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36311/jhgd.v33.14480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:COVID-19疫情引发了严重的健康危机,非必要的医疗服务被暂停,与疫情无关的严重疾病(包括青光眼)的治疗变得次要。随着社会隔离措施的灵活化,有必要恢复门诊治疗,同时尊重巴西统一医疗系统提供的医疗公平性。目的:描述在 COVID-19 大流行期间根据临床眼科标准对青光眼进展进行的风险分类。对 2020 年 3 月至 9 月期间在 FMABC 大学中心眼科部青光眼科预约就诊的患者病历进行了审查。共审查了 489 份病历(881 只眼睛),并根据青光眼进展风险将患者分为 4 组。结果:各组患者的年龄(平均 67.04 ± 11.72 岁)和性别(55.5% 为女性,44.5% 为男性)均相同。原发性开角型青光眼是最常见的病因,占 45.2%,其次是原发性闭角型青光眼,占 15.7%。两组患者进行了比较,发现在分析的 08 个方面中,有 04 个方面存在统计学差异(P<0.005):结论:本研究提出的进展风险分类方法易于应用,有助于管理人员在 COVID-19 大流行期间优先考虑最严重的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation of risk stratification for the care of glaucoma patients during the resumption of in-person care during the COVID-19 pandemic – a preliminary study.
Introduction: the COVID-19 pandemic sparked a serious health crisis in which non-essential medical services were suspended, with the management of serious diseases not related to the pandemic, including glaucoma, becoming secondary in importance. With the flexibilization of social isolation measures, resuming outpatient care was necessary, respecting the health equity provided by the Brazilian Unified Health System. Objective: to describe a risk classification of glaucoma progression based on clinical ophthalmology criteria during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: observational study of an administrative nature. A review was carried out of the medical records of patients who had scheduled appointments between March and September of 2020 in the glaucoma sector of the FMABC University Center’s Department of Ophthalmology. A total of 489 medical records (881 eyes) were reviewed, and patients were divided into 4 groups according to the risk of glaucoma progression. Eyes were evaluated for visual acuity (VA), optic disc cup, pachymetry, intraocular pressure (IOP), mean number of eyes drop medications used, and global visual field indexes. Results: groups were homogeneous in terms of age (mean 67.04 ± 11.72 years) and sex (55.5% women and 44.5% men). Primary open-angle glaucoma was the most prevalent etiology, present in 45.2% of patients, followed by primary angle-closure glaucoma in 15.7%. The groups were compared with each other, and a statistical difference (p<0.005) was found in 04 of the 08 aspects analyzed: VA, optic disc cup, IOP and mean number of eyes drop medications used. Conclusion: the risk classification for progression proposed in this study was easily applied and aided managers in prioritizing the most serious care during the COVID-19 pandemic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Human Growth and Development
Journal of Human Growth and Development Social Sciences-Life-span and Life-course Studies
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信