爱迪生《加图》的非凡出版史:版本、问题、盗版

David Francis Taylor
{"title":"爱迪生《加图》的非凡出版史:版本、问题、盗版","authors":"David Francis Taylor","doi":"10.1086/727731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The remarkable theatrical history of Joseph Addison’s 1713 tragedy Cato is well known, but the play is also an exceptional case in book history. This essay looks in detail at its two entirely distinct “first” editions. It resolves the relationship between these two editions and considers the quite different problems they raise for the bibliographer: the one of how we distinguish between edition and issue in a context of frenzied publication, standing type, and incremental resetting; the other, of how a manifestly substandard and suspicious edition came to carry the self-proclaimed hallmark of the play’s true publisher, Jacob Tonson. The early print history of Addison’s Cato, this essay shows, both puts pressure on the language of bibliography and also marks an important and revealing episode in a number of larger histories: those of the Tonson house, of book piracy and copyright protection, and of the bestseller. Appendices provide bibliographical descriptions of the 1713 Qα and Qβ editions, press variants of the earliest three issues of Qα, and uncorrected errors in Qβ.","PeriodicalId":22928,"journal":{"name":"The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America","volume":"561 ","pages":"441 - 478"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Extraordinary Publication History of Addison’s Cato: Editions, Issues, Piracies\",\"authors\":\"David Francis Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/727731\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The remarkable theatrical history of Joseph Addison’s 1713 tragedy Cato is well known, but the play is also an exceptional case in book history. This essay looks in detail at its two entirely distinct “first” editions. It resolves the relationship between these two editions and considers the quite different problems they raise for the bibliographer: the one of how we distinguish between edition and issue in a context of frenzied publication, standing type, and incremental resetting; the other, of how a manifestly substandard and suspicious edition came to carry the self-proclaimed hallmark of the play’s true publisher, Jacob Tonson. The early print history of Addison’s Cato, this essay shows, both puts pressure on the language of bibliography and also marks an important and revealing episode in a number of larger histories: those of the Tonson house, of book piracy and copyright protection, and of the bestseller. Appendices provide bibliographical descriptions of the 1713 Qα and Qβ editions, press variants of the earliest three issues of Qα, and uncorrected errors in Qβ.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America\",\"volume\":\"561 \",\"pages\":\"441 - 478\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/727731\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/727731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

约瑟夫-艾迪生(Joseph Addison)1713 年的悲剧《卡托》(Cato)非凡的戏剧史众所周知,但该剧也是图书史上的一个特例。本文详细研究了该剧两个完全不同的 "初版"。它解决了这两个版本之间的关系,并考虑了它们给书目编纂者带来的截然不同的问题:一个是在疯狂出版、固定字体和逐步重置的背景下,我们如何区分版本和发行;另一个是一个明显不合标准且可疑的版本是如何带有该剧真正的出版商雅各布-唐森自称的印记的。这篇文章表明,爱迪生的《卡托》的早期印刷史既给书目语言带来了压力,也标志着唐森家族史、盗版书和版权保护史以及畅销书史等更多历史中一个重要而有启发性的插曲。附录提供了 1713 年 Qα 版和 Qβ 版的书目描述、最早三期 Qα 的印刷变体以及 Qβ 中未更正的错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Extraordinary Publication History of Addison’s Cato: Editions, Issues, Piracies
The remarkable theatrical history of Joseph Addison’s 1713 tragedy Cato is well known, but the play is also an exceptional case in book history. This essay looks in detail at its two entirely distinct “first” editions. It resolves the relationship between these two editions and considers the quite different problems they raise for the bibliographer: the one of how we distinguish between edition and issue in a context of frenzied publication, standing type, and incremental resetting; the other, of how a manifestly substandard and suspicious edition came to carry the self-proclaimed hallmark of the play’s true publisher, Jacob Tonson. The early print history of Addison’s Cato, this essay shows, both puts pressure on the language of bibliography and also marks an important and revealing episode in a number of larger histories: those of the Tonson house, of book piracy and copyright protection, and of the bestseller. Appendices provide bibliographical descriptions of the 1713 Qα and Qβ editions, press variants of the earliest three issues of Qα, and uncorrected errors in Qβ.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信