RELAY,厄洛替尼加雷莫芦单抗治疗未经治疗的表皮生长因子受体突变转移性 NSCLC:表皮生长因子受体外显子 19 基因缺失变异的治疗结果

IF 3 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Kazumi Nishino MD, PhD , Jin-Yuan Shih MD, PhD , Kazuhiko Nakagawa MD, PhD , Martin Reck MD, PhD , Edward B. Garon MD , Michelle Carlsen MS , Tomoko Matsui , Carla Visseren-Grul MD , Ernest Nadal MD, PhD
{"title":"RELAY,厄洛替尼加雷莫芦单抗治疗未经治疗的表皮生长因子受体突变转移性 NSCLC:表皮生长因子受体外显子 19 基因缺失变异的治疗结果","authors":"Kazumi Nishino MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jin-Yuan Shih MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Kazuhiko Nakagawa MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Martin Reck MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Edward B. Garon MD ,&nbsp;Michelle Carlsen MS ,&nbsp;Tomoko Matsui ,&nbsp;Carla Visseren-Grul MD ,&nbsp;Ernest Nadal MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><em>EGFR</em> gene mutations are drivers of NSCLC. The RELAY double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled phase 3 study revealed superior progression-free survival (PFS) for ramucirumab plus erlotinib (RAM + ERL) versus PBO (PBO + ERL) in patients with untreated advanced NSCLC and an <em>EGFR-</em>activating mutation. This exploratory analysis evaluated potential associations between <em>EGFR</em> exon 19 deletion (ex19del) variants and clinical outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients (N = 449) were randomized (1:1) to RAM plus ERL or PBO plus ERL. Plasma samples were collected at baseline, on treatment, and at 30-day post-study treatment discontinuation follow-up. Baseline and treatment-emergent gene alterations were investigated by Guardant360 next-generation sequencing. Patients with a valid baseline plasma sample and ex19del were included (RAM + ERL, n = 62; PBO + ERL, n = 72).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The most common ex19del variant was E746_A750del (67.2%); <em>EGFR</em> E746 deletions (E746del) occurred more frequently than L747 deletions (74.6% versus 25.4%, respectively). <em>TP53</em> mutations were the most frequently co-occurring baseline gene alterations. With treatment arms combined, median PFS was 18.0 months versus 12.5 months for patients with uncommon (non-E746_A750del, n = 44) versus common (E746_A750del, n = 90) ex19del variants (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.657 [95% confidence interval or CI:1.044–2.630]). Median PFS was longer with RAM plus ERL versus PBO plus ERL for patients with the common (15.2 versus 9.9 mo; HR = 0.564 [95% CI: 0.344–0.926]) and E746del (15.4 versus 9.9 mo; HR = 0.587 [95% CI: 0.363–0.951]) variants. Treatment-emergent post-progression <em>EGFR</em> T790M rates were higher in the common versus uncommon and E746del versus L747 deletion subgroups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>RAM plus ERL provides benefit and improves treatment outcomes for patients with metastatic NSCLC with <em>EGFR</em> ex19del variants.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17675,"journal":{"name":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666364323001674/pdfft?md5=9730c0b0a5718311961dbe0dd364d96e&pid=1-s2.0-S2666364323001674-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RELAY, Erlotinib Plus Ramucirumab in Untreated, EGFR-Mutated, Metastatic NSCLC: Outcomes by EGFR Exon 19 Deletion Variants\",\"authors\":\"Kazumi Nishino MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jin-Yuan Shih MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Kazuhiko Nakagawa MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Martin Reck MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Edward B. Garon MD ,&nbsp;Michelle Carlsen MS ,&nbsp;Tomoko Matsui ,&nbsp;Carla Visseren-Grul MD ,&nbsp;Ernest Nadal MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100624\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><em>EGFR</em> gene mutations are drivers of NSCLC. The RELAY double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled phase 3 study revealed superior progression-free survival (PFS) for ramucirumab plus erlotinib (RAM + ERL) versus PBO (PBO + ERL) in patients with untreated advanced NSCLC and an <em>EGFR-</em>activating mutation. This exploratory analysis evaluated potential associations between <em>EGFR</em> exon 19 deletion (ex19del) variants and clinical outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients (N = 449) were randomized (1:1) to RAM plus ERL or PBO plus ERL. Plasma samples were collected at baseline, on treatment, and at 30-day post-study treatment discontinuation follow-up. Baseline and treatment-emergent gene alterations were investigated by Guardant360 next-generation sequencing. Patients with a valid baseline plasma sample and ex19del were included (RAM + ERL, n = 62; PBO + ERL, n = 72).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The most common ex19del variant was E746_A750del (67.2%); <em>EGFR</em> E746 deletions (E746del) occurred more frequently than L747 deletions (74.6% versus 25.4%, respectively). <em>TP53</em> mutations were the most frequently co-occurring baseline gene alterations. With treatment arms combined, median PFS was 18.0 months versus 12.5 months for patients with uncommon (non-E746_A750del, n = 44) versus common (E746_A750del, n = 90) ex19del variants (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.657 [95% confidence interval or CI:1.044–2.630]). Median PFS was longer with RAM plus ERL versus PBO plus ERL for patients with the common (15.2 versus 9.9 mo; HR = 0.564 [95% CI: 0.344–0.926]) and E746del (15.4 versus 9.9 mo; HR = 0.587 [95% CI: 0.363–0.951]) variants. Treatment-emergent post-progression <em>EGFR</em> T790M rates were higher in the common versus uncommon and E746del versus L747 deletion subgroups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>RAM plus ERL provides benefit and improves treatment outcomes for patients with metastatic NSCLC with <em>EGFR</em> ex19del variants.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JTO Clinical and Research Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666364323001674/pdfft?md5=9730c0b0a5718311961dbe0dd364d96e&pid=1-s2.0-S2666364323001674-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JTO Clinical and Research Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666364323001674\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666364323001674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言EGFR基因突变是NSCLC的驱动因素。RELAY双盲、安慰剂(PBO)对照3期研究显示,在未经治疗的晚期NSCLC和EGFR激活突变患者中,雷莫芦单抗加厄洛替尼(RAM + ERL)的无进展生存期(PFS)优于PBO(PBO + ERL)。这项探索性分析评估了表皮生长因子受体19外显子缺失(ex19del)变异与临床结果之间的潜在关联。方法将患者(N = 449)随机(1:1)分配到RAM + ERL或PBO + ERL。在基线期、治疗期间和研究结束后 30 天的治疗随访中采集血浆样本。通过 Guardant360 下一代测序对基线和治疗中出现的基因改变进行调查。结果最常见的ex19del变异是E746_A750del(67.2%);表皮生长因子受体E746缺失(E746del)发生率高于L747缺失(分别为74.6%和25.4%)。TP53突变是最常见的共存基线基因改变。合并治疗方案后,不常见(非E746_A750del,n = 44)与常见(E746_A750del,n = 90)ex19del变异患者的中位生存期分别为18.0个月和12.5个月(危险比[HR] = 1.657 [95%置信区间或CI:1.044-2.630])。对于普通变异(15.2 个月对 9.9 个月;HR = 0.564 [95% CI:0.344-0.926])和 E746del 变异(15.4 个月对 9.9 个月;HR = 0.587 [95% CI:0.363-0.951])患者,RAM 加 ERL 比 PBO 加 ERL 的中位生存期更长。在常见亚组与不常见亚组以及E746del亚组与L747缺失亚组中,治疗后突发的EGFR T790M发生率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
RELAY, Erlotinib Plus Ramucirumab in Untreated, EGFR-Mutated, Metastatic NSCLC: Outcomes by EGFR Exon 19 Deletion Variants

Introduction

EGFR gene mutations are drivers of NSCLC. The RELAY double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled phase 3 study revealed superior progression-free survival (PFS) for ramucirumab plus erlotinib (RAM + ERL) versus PBO (PBO + ERL) in patients with untreated advanced NSCLC and an EGFR-activating mutation. This exploratory analysis evaluated potential associations between EGFR exon 19 deletion (ex19del) variants and clinical outcomes.

Methods

Patients (N = 449) were randomized (1:1) to RAM plus ERL or PBO plus ERL. Plasma samples were collected at baseline, on treatment, and at 30-day post-study treatment discontinuation follow-up. Baseline and treatment-emergent gene alterations were investigated by Guardant360 next-generation sequencing. Patients with a valid baseline plasma sample and ex19del were included (RAM + ERL, n = 62; PBO + ERL, n = 72).

Results

The most common ex19del variant was E746_A750del (67.2%); EGFR E746 deletions (E746del) occurred more frequently than L747 deletions (74.6% versus 25.4%, respectively). TP53 mutations were the most frequently co-occurring baseline gene alterations. With treatment arms combined, median PFS was 18.0 months versus 12.5 months for patients with uncommon (non-E746_A750del, n = 44) versus common (E746_A750del, n = 90) ex19del variants (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.657 [95% confidence interval or CI:1.044–2.630]). Median PFS was longer with RAM plus ERL versus PBO plus ERL for patients with the common (15.2 versus 9.9 mo; HR = 0.564 [95% CI: 0.344–0.926]) and E746del (15.4 versus 9.9 mo; HR = 0.587 [95% CI: 0.363–0.951]) variants. Treatment-emergent post-progression EGFR T790M rates were higher in the common versus uncommon and E746del versus L747 deletion subgroups.

Conclusions

RAM plus ERL provides benefit and improves treatment outcomes for patients with metastatic NSCLC with EGFR ex19del variants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
145
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信