根据国际劳工组织的建议分析 2022 年国家职业病清单:融入欧洲立法

A.V. Basanets, V. Hvozdetskyi
{"title":"根据国际劳工组织的建议分析 2022 年国家职业病清单:融入欧洲立法","authors":"A.V. Basanets, V. Hvozdetskyi","doi":"10.32402/dovkil2023.04.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: In connection with the reintegration processes of Ukraine's accession to the European Union, the system of recognition, registration, accounting of occupational diseases and the corresponding legislative and methodological base must be adapted to international requirements and recommendations. The level of occupational morbidity in the country does not reflect its real state due to many social and medical reasons. The purpose of the study: analysis of the new edition of the List of occupational diseases and instructions for its use by the ILO in 2022, comparison of its main provisions with a similar list in Ukraine with the aim of the upcoming adaptation of the of occupational diseases registration system in Ukraine to the requirements of the European Union in connection with the process of European integration. Materials and methods: Analytical review of scientific publications was performed using databases of scientific libraries Pub Med, Medline and text databases of scientific publishing houses Pub Med, Central, BMJ group and other VIP databases. The main legislative documents of Ukraine and the International Labor Organization regulating the process of occupational diseases recognizing are analyzed. System and content analysis methods are used. Results: A comparative analysis of materials on the occupational diseases recognition according to the ILO recommendations, as well as similar domestic documents, revealed the unity of general principles. However, at the same time, significant differences were found in the formation of the list of occupational diseases. The ILO list of occupational diseases provides more detailed information on the causative agent, data on occupational exposure to hazardous substances, features of etiopathogenesis, toxicological profile for chemicals, and biological mechanisms for physical and biological factors, main health effects and diagnostic criteria, as well as measures of occupational diseases prevention. This information is not included in the domestic list of occupational diseases and instructions for its use, which significantly limits the possibilities for diagnosing and objectifying of occupational diseases. Considering Ukraine's preparations for joining the European Union, it is obvious that it is necessary to revise domestic legislation regarding the occupational diseases recognition in accordance with international standards and ILO recommendations.","PeriodicalId":144023,"journal":{"name":"Environment & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the national list of occupational diseases in accordance with the recommendations of the ILO in 2022: integration into European legislation\",\"authors\":\"A.V. Basanets, V. Hvozdetskyi\",\"doi\":\"10.32402/dovkil2023.04.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: In connection with the reintegration processes of Ukraine's accession to the European Union, the system of recognition, registration, accounting of occupational diseases and the corresponding legislative and methodological base must be adapted to international requirements and recommendations. The level of occupational morbidity in the country does not reflect its real state due to many social and medical reasons. The purpose of the study: analysis of the new edition of the List of occupational diseases and instructions for its use by the ILO in 2022, comparison of its main provisions with a similar list in Ukraine with the aim of the upcoming adaptation of the of occupational diseases registration system in Ukraine to the requirements of the European Union in connection with the process of European integration. Materials and methods: Analytical review of scientific publications was performed using databases of scientific libraries Pub Med, Medline and text databases of scientific publishing houses Pub Med, Central, BMJ group and other VIP databases. The main legislative documents of Ukraine and the International Labor Organization regulating the process of occupational diseases recognizing are analyzed. System and content analysis methods are used. Results: A comparative analysis of materials on the occupational diseases recognition according to the ILO recommendations, as well as similar domestic documents, revealed the unity of general principles. However, at the same time, significant differences were found in the formation of the list of occupational diseases. The ILO list of occupational diseases provides more detailed information on the causative agent, data on occupational exposure to hazardous substances, features of etiopathogenesis, toxicological profile for chemicals, and biological mechanisms for physical and biological factors, main health effects and diagnostic criteria, as well as measures of occupational diseases prevention. This information is not included in the domestic list of occupational diseases and instructions for its use, which significantly limits the possibilities for diagnosing and objectifying of occupational diseases. Considering Ukraine's preparations for joining the European Union, it is obvious that it is necessary to revise domestic legislation regarding the occupational diseases recognition in accordance with international standards and ILO recommendations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":144023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environment & Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environment & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32402/dovkil2023.04.016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment & Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32402/dovkil2023.04.016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:在乌克兰加入欧盟的一体化进程中,职业病的确认、登记、统计制度以及相应的法律和方法基础必须适应国际要求和建议。由于许多社会和医学原因,乌克兰的职业病发病率水平并不能反映其真实情况。研究目的:分析国际劳工组织 2022 年新版职业病清单及其使用说明,将其主要条款与乌克 兰的类似清单进行比较,目的是使乌克兰的职业病登记制度适应欧盟在欧洲一体化进程中的 要求。材料和方法:利用科学图书馆数据库 Pub Med、Medline 和科学出版社的文本数据库 Pub Med、Central、BMJ 集团和其他 VIP 数据库对科学出版物进行了分析审查。分析了乌克兰和国际劳工组织关于职业病认定程序的主要立法文件。采用了系统分析和内容分析方法。结果:对根据国际劳工组织建议进行职业病认定的材料以及类似的国内文件进行的比较分析表明,总体原则是统一的。但与此同时,在职业病清单的形成方面也发现了明显的差异。国际劳工组织的职业病清单提供了更详细的信息,包括致病因素、职业接触有害物质的数据、发病机理特征、化学品毒理学概况、物理和生物因素的生物机制、主要健康影响和诊断标准,以及职业病预防措施。国内的职业病清单及其使用说明中不包括这些信息,这极大地限制了职业病诊断和客观化的可能性。考虑到乌克兰准备加入欧盟,显然有必要根据国际标准和国际劳工组织的建议修订有关职业病认定的国内立法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of the national list of occupational diseases in accordance with the recommendations of the ILO in 2022: integration into European legislation
Introduction: In connection with the reintegration processes of Ukraine's accession to the European Union, the system of recognition, registration, accounting of occupational diseases and the corresponding legislative and methodological base must be adapted to international requirements and recommendations. The level of occupational morbidity in the country does not reflect its real state due to many social and medical reasons. The purpose of the study: analysis of the new edition of the List of occupational diseases and instructions for its use by the ILO in 2022, comparison of its main provisions with a similar list in Ukraine with the aim of the upcoming adaptation of the of occupational diseases registration system in Ukraine to the requirements of the European Union in connection with the process of European integration. Materials and methods: Analytical review of scientific publications was performed using databases of scientific libraries Pub Med, Medline and text databases of scientific publishing houses Pub Med, Central, BMJ group and other VIP databases. The main legislative documents of Ukraine and the International Labor Organization regulating the process of occupational diseases recognizing are analyzed. System and content analysis methods are used. Results: A comparative analysis of materials on the occupational diseases recognition according to the ILO recommendations, as well as similar domestic documents, revealed the unity of general principles. However, at the same time, significant differences were found in the formation of the list of occupational diseases. The ILO list of occupational diseases provides more detailed information on the causative agent, data on occupational exposure to hazardous substances, features of etiopathogenesis, toxicological profile for chemicals, and biological mechanisms for physical and biological factors, main health effects and diagnostic criteria, as well as measures of occupational diseases prevention. This information is not included in the domestic list of occupational diseases and instructions for its use, which significantly limits the possibilities for diagnosing and objectifying of occupational diseases. Considering Ukraine's preparations for joining the European Union, it is obvious that it is necessary to revise domestic legislation regarding the occupational diseases recognition in accordance with international standards and ILO recommendations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信