R. Wulandari, A. Laksono, Nikmatur Rohmah, Leny Latifah, Hadi Ashar
{"title":"确定在印度尼西亚贫困地区提高初级保健利用率的目标","authors":"R. Wulandari, A. Laksono, Nikmatur Rohmah, Leny Latifah, Hadi Ashar","doi":"10.20473/jaki.v11i2.2023.299-310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Primary health care (PHC) is the closest institution known to people in disadvantaged areas.\nAims: The study determines the policy target based on the demographic characteristics to increase PHC utilization in a disadvantaged area.\nMethods: The cross-sectional research explored 42,644 respondents. In addition to PHC utilization, the study examined eight independent variables: residence, gender, marital, age, wealth, insurance, education, and travel time. We employed a binary logistic regression in the last stage.\nResults: Live in urban areas had 1.967 more likely to utilize the PHC (95%CI 1.942-1.992). Males could be 1.412 higher than females (95%CI 1.402-1.421). All marital types had more chances than never married. All education was more likely than no education. The employed had 0.972 less likely than the unemployed (95%CI 0.965-0.980). All wealth groups had less possibility than the poorest. Those with government-run insurance were likelier than other types. The ≤10 minutes travel time was more likely than the >10 minutes.\nConclusion: There were seven policy target characteristics to increase PHC use in disadvantaged areas in Indonesia: live in a rural area, female, never married, have no education, employed, not the poorest, don't have government-run insurance, and have a travel time of more than ten minutes.\nKeywords: disadvantaged area, healthcare evaluation, primary health care, public health","PeriodicalId":32968,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Administrasi Kesehatan Indonesia","volume":"40 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DETERMINE THE TARGET TO INCREASE PRIMARY HEALTHCARE UTILIZATION IN INDONESIA'S DISADVANTAGED AREAS\",\"authors\":\"R. Wulandari, A. Laksono, Nikmatur Rohmah, Leny Latifah, Hadi Ashar\",\"doi\":\"10.20473/jaki.v11i2.2023.299-310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Primary health care (PHC) is the closest institution known to people in disadvantaged areas.\\nAims: The study determines the policy target based on the demographic characteristics to increase PHC utilization in a disadvantaged area.\\nMethods: The cross-sectional research explored 42,644 respondents. In addition to PHC utilization, the study examined eight independent variables: residence, gender, marital, age, wealth, insurance, education, and travel time. We employed a binary logistic regression in the last stage.\\nResults: Live in urban areas had 1.967 more likely to utilize the PHC (95%CI 1.942-1.992). Males could be 1.412 higher than females (95%CI 1.402-1.421). All marital types had more chances than never married. All education was more likely than no education. The employed had 0.972 less likely than the unemployed (95%CI 0.965-0.980). All wealth groups had less possibility than the poorest. Those with government-run insurance were likelier than other types. The ≤10 minutes travel time was more likely than the >10 minutes.\\nConclusion: There were seven policy target characteristics to increase PHC use in disadvantaged areas in Indonesia: live in a rural area, female, never married, have no education, employed, not the poorest, don't have government-run insurance, and have a travel time of more than ten minutes.\\nKeywords: disadvantaged area, healthcare evaluation, primary health care, public health\",\"PeriodicalId\":32968,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Administrasi Kesehatan Indonesia\",\"volume\":\"40 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Administrasi Kesehatan Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20473/jaki.v11i2.2023.299-310\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Administrasi Kesehatan Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/jaki.v11i2.2023.299-310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
DETERMINE THE TARGET TO INCREASE PRIMARY HEALTHCARE UTILIZATION IN INDONESIA'S DISADVANTAGED AREAS
Background: Primary health care (PHC) is the closest institution known to people in disadvantaged areas.
Aims: The study determines the policy target based on the demographic characteristics to increase PHC utilization in a disadvantaged area.
Methods: The cross-sectional research explored 42,644 respondents. In addition to PHC utilization, the study examined eight independent variables: residence, gender, marital, age, wealth, insurance, education, and travel time. We employed a binary logistic regression in the last stage.
Results: Live in urban areas had 1.967 more likely to utilize the PHC (95%CI 1.942-1.992). Males could be 1.412 higher than females (95%CI 1.402-1.421). All marital types had more chances than never married. All education was more likely than no education. The employed had 0.972 less likely than the unemployed (95%CI 0.965-0.980). All wealth groups had less possibility than the poorest. Those with government-run insurance were likelier than other types. The ≤10 minutes travel time was more likely than the >10 minutes.
Conclusion: There were seven policy target characteristics to increase PHC use in disadvantaged areas in Indonesia: live in a rural area, female, never married, have no education, employed, not the poorest, don't have government-run insurance, and have a travel time of more than ten minutes.
Keywords: disadvantaged area, healthcare evaluation, primary health care, public health