城市污水合流管道的总负荷计算

M. Monadi, M. Mohammadi
{"title":"城市污水合流管道的总负荷计算","authors":"M. Monadi, M. Mohammadi","doi":"10.34172/jaehr.1296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Particle size of sediment is necessary to design and operation of sewer systems. In this regard, calculation of the equivalent particle diameter (EPD) is of important to determine the particle Reynolds number (Ret ) as well as total load calculation. Methods: In this research work, 5 different particle diameters (i.e. d35, d50, d65, dm and deff) have been used in three famous total load calculation methods for calculating the best EPD. For this goal, a field experimental data has been collected at the entrance grit chamber of wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) of Khomein city, Iran. The total load of the sediments has been measured and the results compared with the total loads calculated by the three famous total load computation methods (i.e. Graf & Acaroglu method, Laursen method and Yang & Lim method) by using the particle diameters. Results: The results show that the methods estimate the total load of sediments with the relative errors of 4.25, 10.80 and 1.26 by using dm, d35 and d65 as the EPDs, respectively. Also, a simplified and improved correction factor has been developed and the results show that by applying the correction factor the relative errors of the methods decrease and they are equal to 10.34, 3.45 and 496.5, respectively. The improvement of the mentioned total load methods is equal to are 82.70%, 93.10% and 34.80%, respectively. Conclusion: The proposed correction factor can be applied for the standard deviation between 2.5-4.7 and the median particle diameter between 0.84-2.90 mm.","PeriodicalId":14962,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research","volume":"77 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Total Load Calculation in Combined Urban Sewer Conduits\",\"authors\":\"M. Monadi, M. Mohammadi\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/jaehr.1296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Particle size of sediment is necessary to design and operation of sewer systems. In this regard, calculation of the equivalent particle diameter (EPD) is of important to determine the particle Reynolds number (Ret ) as well as total load calculation. Methods: In this research work, 5 different particle diameters (i.e. d35, d50, d65, dm and deff) have been used in three famous total load calculation methods for calculating the best EPD. For this goal, a field experimental data has been collected at the entrance grit chamber of wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) of Khomein city, Iran. The total load of the sediments has been measured and the results compared with the total loads calculated by the three famous total load computation methods (i.e. Graf & Acaroglu method, Laursen method and Yang & Lim method) by using the particle diameters. Results: The results show that the methods estimate the total load of sediments with the relative errors of 4.25, 10.80 and 1.26 by using dm, d35 and d65 as the EPDs, respectively. Also, a simplified and improved correction factor has been developed and the results show that by applying the correction factor the relative errors of the methods decrease and they are equal to 10.34, 3.45 and 496.5, respectively. The improvement of the mentioned total load methods is equal to are 82.70%, 93.10% and 34.80%, respectively. Conclusion: The proposed correction factor can be applied for the standard deviation between 2.5-4.7 and the median particle diameter between 0.84-2.90 mm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research\",\"volume\":\"77 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/jaehr.1296\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jaehr.1296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:沉积物的粒径对下水道系统的设计和运行十分必要。在这方面,计算等效颗粒直径 (EPD) 对于确定颗粒雷诺数 (Ret ) 和计算总负荷非常重要。方法:在这项研究工作中,三种著名的总负荷计算方法使用了 5 种不同的颗粒直径(即 d35、d50、d65、dm 和 deff)来计算最佳 EPD。为此,我们在伊朗 Khomein 市污水处理厂(WWTP)的入口沉砂室收集了现场实验数据。测量了沉积物的总负荷,并将测量结果与三种著名的总负荷计算方法(即 Graf & Acaroglu 法、Laursen 法和 Yang & Lim 法)利用颗粒直径计算出的总负荷进行了比较。结果显示结果表明,使用 dm、d35 和 d65 作为 EPD,这些方法估算出的沉积物总负荷的相对误差分别为 4.25、10.80 和 1.26。此外,还开发了一个简化和改进的校正因子,结果表明,采用该校正因子后,上述方法的相对误差有所减小,分别为 10.34、3.45 和 496.5。上述总负荷方法的改进幅度分别为 82.70%、93.10% 和 34.80%。结论建议的修正系数可用于标准偏差在 2.5-4.7 之间和颗粒直径中值在 0.84-2.90 毫米之间的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the Total Load Calculation in Combined Urban Sewer Conduits
Background: Particle size of sediment is necessary to design and operation of sewer systems. In this regard, calculation of the equivalent particle diameter (EPD) is of important to determine the particle Reynolds number (Ret ) as well as total load calculation. Methods: In this research work, 5 different particle diameters (i.e. d35, d50, d65, dm and deff) have been used in three famous total load calculation methods for calculating the best EPD. For this goal, a field experimental data has been collected at the entrance grit chamber of wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) of Khomein city, Iran. The total load of the sediments has been measured and the results compared with the total loads calculated by the three famous total load computation methods (i.e. Graf & Acaroglu method, Laursen method and Yang & Lim method) by using the particle diameters. Results: The results show that the methods estimate the total load of sediments with the relative errors of 4.25, 10.80 and 1.26 by using dm, d35 and d65 as the EPDs, respectively. Also, a simplified and improved correction factor has been developed and the results show that by applying the correction factor the relative errors of the methods decrease and they are equal to 10.34, 3.45 and 496.5, respectively. The improvement of the mentioned total load methods is equal to are 82.70%, 93.10% and 34.80%, respectively. Conclusion: The proposed correction factor can be applied for the standard deviation between 2.5-4.7 and the median particle diameter between 0.84-2.90 mm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信