联合循环发电厂职业接触化学材料的健康风险评估

Azam Motahari, Tooraj Dana, N. Kargari, S. Monavari, Nematollah Jaafarzadeh Haghighi Fard
{"title":"联合循环发电厂职业接触化学材料的健康风险评估","authors":"Azam Motahari, Tooraj Dana, N. Kargari, S. Monavari, Nematollah Jaafarzadeh Haghighi Fard","doi":"10.34172/jaehr.1289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study aimed to evaluate the occupational exposure of workers at a combined-cycle power plant located in the southwestern region of Iran. The assessment focuses on the inhalation exposure route to workplace emissions. Methods: The primary locations for potential pollutant emissions were identified in close proximity to the areas where chemicals were introduced and utilized within the production process. Sulfuric acid, sodium hydroxide, ammonia, oil mist, toluene, hydrogen sulfide, hydrazine, and tetrachloromethane were measured and analyzed using the NIOSH standard. Dose-response assessment was estimated using inhalation unit risk (IUR) for cancer risks and reference concentration (RFC) and reference exposure levels (REL) for non-cancer risks. Risk assessment was performed based on the Environmental Health Hazard Assessment guideline. Results: The results showed that ammonia and toluene had the highest and lowest concentration of pollutants emitted in workplace, respectively. The inhalation of ammonia and sulfuric acid and their daily absorption were at high risk level (HQ>1). Other noncancerous compounds had HQ<1. While the hazard index (HI) for total non-cancer risks was 5.34E+01 (HI>1), it was likely to have non-cancerous risks. For carcinogenic risks, they were calculated to be 9.58E-03 and 5.47E-04 for hydrazine and tetrachloromethane, respectively. The total carcinogenic risk of the emissions was calculated at 1.01E-02, which was in the significant range (more than 10-4) (i.e. in the range of hazardous cancer effects). Conclusion: This study confirmed the presence of non-carcinogenic risks, while the quantity of cancer risks fell within the Significant range, indicating a potential for carcinogenic risks.","PeriodicalId":14962,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research","volume":"37 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health Risk Assessment of Occupational Exposure to Chemical Materials in a Combined-Cycle Power Plant\",\"authors\":\"Azam Motahari, Tooraj Dana, N. Kargari, S. Monavari, Nematollah Jaafarzadeh Haghighi Fard\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/jaehr.1289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: This study aimed to evaluate the occupational exposure of workers at a combined-cycle power plant located in the southwestern region of Iran. The assessment focuses on the inhalation exposure route to workplace emissions. Methods: The primary locations for potential pollutant emissions were identified in close proximity to the areas where chemicals were introduced and utilized within the production process. Sulfuric acid, sodium hydroxide, ammonia, oil mist, toluene, hydrogen sulfide, hydrazine, and tetrachloromethane were measured and analyzed using the NIOSH standard. Dose-response assessment was estimated using inhalation unit risk (IUR) for cancer risks and reference concentration (RFC) and reference exposure levels (REL) for non-cancer risks. Risk assessment was performed based on the Environmental Health Hazard Assessment guideline. Results: The results showed that ammonia and toluene had the highest and lowest concentration of pollutants emitted in workplace, respectively. The inhalation of ammonia and sulfuric acid and their daily absorption were at high risk level (HQ>1). Other noncancerous compounds had HQ<1. While the hazard index (HI) for total non-cancer risks was 5.34E+01 (HI>1), it was likely to have non-cancerous risks. For carcinogenic risks, they were calculated to be 9.58E-03 and 5.47E-04 for hydrazine and tetrachloromethane, respectively. The total carcinogenic risk of the emissions was calculated at 1.01E-02, which was in the significant range (more than 10-4) (i.e. in the range of hazardous cancer effects). Conclusion: This study confirmed the presence of non-carcinogenic risks, while the quantity of cancer risks fell within the Significant range, indicating a potential for carcinogenic risks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research\",\"volume\":\"37 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/jaehr.1289\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jaehr.1289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估伊朗西南部地区一家联合循环发电厂工人的职业接触情况。评估的重点是工作场所排放物的吸入接触途径。评估方法在生产过程中引入和使用化学品的区域附近确定了潜在污染物排放的主要地点。采用 NIOSH 标准对硫酸、氢氧化钠、氨、油雾、甲苯、硫化氢、肼和四氯甲烷进行了测量和分析。剂量反应评估采用吸入单位风险 (IUR) 来估算癌症风险,采用参考浓度 (RFC) 和参考接触水平 (REL) 来估算非癌症风险。风险评估是根据环境健康危害评估指南进行的。结果显示结果显示,工作场所排放的污染物中,氨和甲苯的浓度分别最高和最低。氨和硫酸的吸入量和每日吸收量均达到高风险水平(HQ>1)。其他非致癌化合物为 HQ1,可能有非致癌风险。经计算,肼和四氯甲烷的致癌风险分别为 9.58E-03 和 5.47E-04。经计算,排放物的总致癌风险为 1.01E-02,处于显著范围内(大于 10-4)(即处于危险的癌症影响范围内)。结论这项研究证实了非致癌风险的存在,而致癌风险的数量则在显著范围内,表明存在潜在的致癌风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health Risk Assessment of Occupational Exposure to Chemical Materials in a Combined-Cycle Power Plant
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the occupational exposure of workers at a combined-cycle power plant located in the southwestern region of Iran. The assessment focuses on the inhalation exposure route to workplace emissions. Methods: The primary locations for potential pollutant emissions were identified in close proximity to the areas where chemicals were introduced and utilized within the production process. Sulfuric acid, sodium hydroxide, ammonia, oil mist, toluene, hydrogen sulfide, hydrazine, and tetrachloromethane were measured and analyzed using the NIOSH standard. Dose-response assessment was estimated using inhalation unit risk (IUR) for cancer risks and reference concentration (RFC) and reference exposure levels (REL) for non-cancer risks. Risk assessment was performed based on the Environmental Health Hazard Assessment guideline. Results: The results showed that ammonia and toluene had the highest and lowest concentration of pollutants emitted in workplace, respectively. The inhalation of ammonia and sulfuric acid and their daily absorption were at high risk level (HQ>1). Other noncancerous compounds had HQ<1. While the hazard index (HI) for total non-cancer risks was 5.34E+01 (HI>1), it was likely to have non-cancerous risks. For carcinogenic risks, they were calculated to be 9.58E-03 and 5.47E-04 for hydrazine and tetrachloromethane, respectively. The total carcinogenic risk of the emissions was calculated at 1.01E-02, which was in the significant range (more than 10-4) (i.e. in the range of hazardous cancer effects). Conclusion: This study confirmed the presence of non-carcinogenic risks, while the quantity of cancer risks fell within the Significant range, indicating a potential for carcinogenic risks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信