脉络膜黑色素瘤:不同预后系统指导转移监测的敏感性和特异性

I. Seibel
{"title":"脉络膜黑色素瘤:不同预后系统指导转移监测的敏感性和特异性","authors":"I. Seibel","doi":"10.1159/000535360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Uveal melanoma (UM) metastasises in ˜50% of patients, most frequently to the liver. Surveillance imaging can provide early detection of hepatic metastases; however, guidance regarding UM patient risk stratification for surveillance is unclear. This study compared sensitivity and specificity of four current prognostic systems, when used for risk stratification for surveillance, on patients treated at the Liverpool Ocular Oncology Centre (LOOC) between 2007–2016 (n = 1047). It found that the Liverpool Uveal Melanoma Prognosticator Online III (LUMPOIII) or Liverpool Parsimonious Model (LPM) offered greater specificity at equal levels of sensitivity than the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) system or monosomy 3 alone, and suggests guidance to achieve 95% sensitivity and 51% specificity (i.e., how to detect the same number of patients with metastases, while reducing the number of negative scans). For example, 180 scans could be safely avoided over 5 years in 200 patients using the most specific approach. LUMPOIII also offered high sensitivity and improved specificity over the AJCC in the absence of genetic information, making the result relevant to centres that do not perform genetic testing, or where such testing is inappropriate or fails. This study provides valuable information for clinical guidelines for risk stratification for surveillance in UM.","PeriodicalId":413988,"journal":{"name":"Kompass Onkologie","volume":"38 34","pages":"196 - 197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aderhautmelanom: Sensitivität und Spezifität verschiedener prognostischer Systeme zur Lenkung der Überwachung auf Metastasen\",\"authors\":\"I. Seibel\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000535360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Uveal melanoma (UM) metastasises in ˜50% of patients, most frequently to the liver. Surveillance imaging can provide early detection of hepatic metastases; however, guidance regarding UM patient risk stratification for surveillance is unclear. This study compared sensitivity and specificity of four current prognostic systems, when used for risk stratification for surveillance, on patients treated at the Liverpool Ocular Oncology Centre (LOOC) between 2007–2016 (n = 1047). It found that the Liverpool Uveal Melanoma Prognosticator Online III (LUMPOIII) or Liverpool Parsimonious Model (LPM) offered greater specificity at equal levels of sensitivity than the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) system or monosomy 3 alone, and suggests guidance to achieve 95% sensitivity and 51% specificity (i.e., how to detect the same number of patients with metastases, while reducing the number of negative scans). For example, 180 scans could be safely avoided over 5 years in 200 patients using the most specific approach. LUMPOIII also offered high sensitivity and improved specificity over the AJCC in the absence of genetic information, making the result relevant to centres that do not perform genetic testing, or where such testing is inappropriate or fails. This study provides valuable information for clinical guidelines for risk stratification for surveillance in UM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":413988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kompass Onkologie\",\"volume\":\"38 34\",\"pages\":\"196 - 197\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kompass Onkologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000535360\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kompass Onkologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000535360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

50%的葡萄膜黑色素瘤(UM)患者会发生转移,最常见的是肝转移。监测成像可早期发现肝转移;然而,有关UM患者监测风险分层的指导尚不明确。本研究比较了利物浦眼肿瘤中心(LOOC)在2007-2016年间对接受治疗的患者(n = 1047)进行监测风险分层时,目前四种预后系统的敏感性和特异性。研究发现,与美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)系统或单体3相比,利物浦葡萄膜黑色素瘤在线预后器III(LUMPOIII)或利物浦拟态模型(LPM)在同等灵敏度水平下具有更高的特异性,并提出了实现95%灵敏度和51%特异性的指导建议(即如何检测出相同数量的转移患者,同时减少阴性扫描的数量)。例如,使用最具特异性的方法,200 名患者在 5 年内可以安全地避免 180 次扫描。在没有基因信息的情况下,LUMPOIII 也比 AJCC 具有更高的灵敏度和更高的特异性,这使得该结果适用于不进行基因检测或基因检测不合适或失败的中心。这项研究为UM监测风险分层的临床指南提供了有价值的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aderhautmelanom: Sensitivität und Spezifität verschiedener prognostischer Systeme zur Lenkung der Überwachung auf Metastasen
Uveal melanoma (UM) metastasises in ˜50% of patients, most frequently to the liver. Surveillance imaging can provide early detection of hepatic metastases; however, guidance regarding UM patient risk stratification for surveillance is unclear. This study compared sensitivity and specificity of four current prognostic systems, when used for risk stratification for surveillance, on patients treated at the Liverpool Ocular Oncology Centre (LOOC) between 2007–2016 (n = 1047). It found that the Liverpool Uveal Melanoma Prognosticator Online III (LUMPOIII) or Liverpool Parsimonious Model (LPM) offered greater specificity at equal levels of sensitivity than the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) system or monosomy 3 alone, and suggests guidance to achieve 95% sensitivity and 51% specificity (i.e., how to detect the same number of patients with metastases, while reducing the number of negative scans). For example, 180 scans could be safely avoided over 5 years in 200 patients using the most specific approach. LUMPOIII also offered high sensitivity and improved specificity over the AJCC in the absence of genetic information, making the result relevant to centres that do not perform genetic testing, or where such testing is inappropriate or fails. This study provides valuable information for clinical guidelines for risk stratification for surveillance in UM.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信