圆形和非圆形截面导弹配置的空气动力特性

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE
M. Ghoreyshi, Nathan M. Shumway, P. Aref, Adam Jirasek, Jürgen Seidel
{"title":"圆形和非圆形截面导弹配置的空气动力特性","authors":"M. Ghoreyshi, Nathan M. Shumway, P. Aref, Adam Jirasek, Jürgen Seidel","doi":"10.2514/1.a35745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper summarizes an investigation of the aerodynamic performance of missile configurations with axisymmetric and nonaxisymmetric cross sections. Configurations have either a circular, oval, pentagonal, triangular, or square cross section and were tested at three different flight conditions: [Formula: see text] and Reynolds number per inch of [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] and Reynolds number per inch of [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] and Reynolds number per inch of [Formula: see text]. The influence of Mach number, shape, and fin deflection was investigated. A prescribed body motion was used to expedite the prediction of the missile aerodynamic forces and moments at different angles of attack compared to many static computational fluid dynamics simulations. The results show that the oval missile model is the most aerodynamically efficient body at all the tested speeds. At higher speeds, all nonstandard configurations produce more normal force and better aerodynamic efficiency than the circular body. The triangular configuration is much less stable than the other models.","PeriodicalId":50048,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets","volume":"105 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aerodynamic Characteristics of Circular and Noncircular Cross-Sectional Missile Configurations\",\"authors\":\"M. Ghoreyshi, Nathan M. Shumway, P. Aref, Adam Jirasek, Jürgen Seidel\",\"doi\":\"10.2514/1.a35745\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper summarizes an investigation of the aerodynamic performance of missile configurations with axisymmetric and nonaxisymmetric cross sections. Configurations have either a circular, oval, pentagonal, triangular, or square cross section and were tested at three different flight conditions: [Formula: see text] and Reynolds number per inch of [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] and Reynolds number per inch of [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] and Reynolds number per inch of [Formula: see text]. The influence of Mach number, shape, and fin deflection was investigated. A prescribed body motion was used to expedite the prediction of the missile aerodynamic forces and moments at different angles of attack compared to many static computational fluid dynamics simulations. The results show that the oval missile model is the most aerodynamically efficient body at all the tested speeds. At higher speeds, all nonstandard configurations produce more normal force and better aerodynamic efficiency than the circular body. The triangular configuration is much less stable than the other models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets\",\"volume\":\"105 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2514/1.a35745\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2514/1.a35745","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文总结了对具有轴对称和非轴对称截面的导弹配置的空气动力性能的研究。这些构型的横截面为圆形、椭圆形、五边形、三角形或正方形,并在三种不同的飞行条件下进行了测试:[公式:见正文]和每英寸雷诺数[公式:见正文],[公式:见正文]和每英寸雷诺数[公式:见正文],以及[公式:见正文]和每英寸雷诺数[公式:见正文]。研究了马赫数、形状和鳍片偏转的影响。与许多静态计算流体动力学模拟相比,使用了规定体运动来加快不同攻角下导弹气动力和力矩的预测。结果表明,在所有测试速度下,椭圆形导弹模型是气动效率最高的机体。在更高的速度下,所有非标准构型产生的法向力都比圆形体大,气动效率也更高。三角形构型的稳定性远低于其他模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aerodynamic Characteristics of Circular and Noncircular Cross-Sectional Missile Configurations
This paper summarizes an investigation of the aerodynamic performance of missile configurations with axisymmetric and nonaxisymmetric cross sections. Configurations have either a circular, oval, pentagonal, triangular, or square cross section and were tested at three different flight conditions: [Formula: see text] and Reynolds number per inch of [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] and Reynolds number per inch of [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] and Reynolds number per inch of [Formula: see text]. The influence of Mach number, shape, and fin deflection was investigated. A prescribed body motion was used to expedite the prediction of the missile aerodynamic forces and moments at different angles of attack compared to many static computational fluid dynamics simulations. The results show that the oval missile model is the most aerodynamically efficient body at all the tested speeds. At higher speeds, all nonstandard configurations produce more normal force and better aerodynamic efficiency than the circular body. The triangular configuration is much less stable than the other models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets
Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets 工程技术-工程:宇航
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
185
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: This Journal, that started it all back in 1963, is devoted to the advancement of the science and technology of astronautics and aeronautics through the dissemination of original archival research papers disclosing new theoretical developments and/or experimental result. The topics include aeroacoustics, aerodynamics, combustion, fundamentals of propulsion, fluid mechanics and reacting flows, fundamental aspects of the aerospace environment, hydrodynamics, lasers and associated phenomena, plasmas, research instrumentation and facilities, structural mechanics and materials, optimization, and thermomechanics and thermochemistry. Papers also are sought which review in an intensive manner the results of recent research developments on any of the topics listed above.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信