碳足迹分析与环保倡议:印度西姆拉喜马偕尔邦大学案例研究

Ritika Bhardwaj, P. K. Attri
{"title":"碳足迹分析与环保倡议:印度西姆拉喜马偕尔邦大学案例研究","authors":"Ritika Bhardwaj, P. K. Attri","doi":"10.9734/ajee/2023/v22i4511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Carbon footprints (CFs) serve as a metric for quantifying the release of greenhouse gases (GHGs) attributable to a specific organization or activity. Taking a step towards fostering sustainable practices in education institution involves reporting CF levels within college campuses. This research centers on computing the carbon footprint of Himachal Pradesh University's Shimla campus (2020-2023), with a focus on understanding emissions trends, particularly the transition from lockdown (2020–2021) to post-lockdown (2021–2022 and 2022–2023) periods amid the COVID-19 pandemic. The study aims to address the challenge posed by educational institutions' substantial energy demands, contributing significantly to GHG emissions. Achieving net-zero emissions remains a formidable task for educational institutions, even with options like remote work and learning. The study underscores the persisting challenge of insufficiently addressing these concerns, despite the potential for students to play a role in mitigating greenhouse gas emission issues with the right information and resources. The research employs the Greenhouse Gas Protocol method to compute the Scope 1 carbon footprint of energy sources, encompassing kerosene, petrol, diesel, and LPG. This approach empowers educational institutions and businesses to construct dependable inventories of their GHG emissions, facilitating progress monitoring and the cultivation of sustainable practices aligned with climate objectives. By utilizing the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, the study evaluates Scope 1 emissions from energy sources like kerosene, petrol, diesel, and LPG, offering a systematic approach for institutions to create reliable inventories aligned with climate goals. The findings highlight kerosene as the predominant contributor, prompting the study to recommend curbing the use of conventional energy sources and transitioning to alternatives. Additionally, the research conducts Scope 2 emission calculations to compare the carbon footprint resulting from electricity consumption, contrasting coal-based electricity generation with hydropower generation. Valuable insights are provided for universities to leverage calculated carbon footprints in identifying effective emission reduction strategies. The study identifies information gaps and inefficient data collection as significant challenges, proposing energy-saving measures and enhanced procurement strategies as beneficial mitigation measures.","PeriodicalId":253461,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Environment & Ecology","volume":"29 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carbon Footprint Analysis and Environmental Initiatives: A Case Study of Himachal Pradesh University, Shimla, H.P., INDIA\",\"authors\":\"Ritika Bhardwaj, P. K. Attri\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/ajee/2023/v22i4511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Carbon footprints (CFs) serve as a metric for quantifying the release of greenhouse gases (GHGs) attributable to a specific organization or activity. Taking a step towards fostering sustainable practices in education institution involves reporting CF levels within college campuses. This research centers on computing the carbon footprint of Himachal Pradesh University's Shimla campus (2020-2023), with a focus on understanding emissions trends, particularly the transition from lockdown (2020–2021) to post-lockdown (2021–2022 and 2022–2023) periods amid the COVID-19 pandemic. The study aims to address the challenge posed by educational institutions' substantial energy demands, contributing significantly to GHG emissions. Achieving net-zero emissions remains a formidable task for educational institutions, even with options like remote work and learning. The study underscores the persisting challenge of insufficiently addressing these concerns, despite the potential for students to play a role in mitigating greenhouse gas emission issues with the right information and resources. The research employs the Greenhouse Gas Protocol method to compute the Scope 1 carbon footprint of energy sources, encompassing kerosene, petrol, diesel, and LPG. This approach empowers educational institutions and businesses to construct dependable inventories of their GHG emissions, facilitating progress monitoring and the cultivation of sustainable practices aligned with climate objectives. By utilizing the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, the study evaluates Scope 1 emissions from energy sources like kerosene, petrol, diesel, and LPG, offering a systematic approach for institutions to create reliable inventories aligned with climate goals. The findings highlight kerosene as the predominant contributor, prompting the study to recommend curbing the use of conventional energy sources and transitioning to alternatives. Additionally, the research conducts Scope 2 emission calculations to compare the carbon footprint resulting from electricity consumption, contrasting coal-based electricity generation with hydropower generation. Valuable insights are provided for universities to leverage calculated carbon footprints in identifying effective emission reduction strategies. The study identifies information gaps and inefficient data collection as significant challenges, proposing energy-saving measures and enhanced procurement strategies as beneficial mitigation measures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":253461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Environment & Ecology\",\"volume\":\"29 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Environment & Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajee/2023/v22i4511\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Environment & Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajee/2023/v22i4511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

碳足迹(CFs)是量化特定组织或活动所释放的温室气体(GHGs)的指标。要在教育机构中促进可持续发展实践,就必须报告大学校园内的碳足迹水平。本研究的核心是计算喜马偕尔邦大学西姆拉校区(2020-2023 年)的碳足迹,重点是了解排放趋势,尤其是在 COVID-19 大流行期间从封锁期(2020-2021 年)到封锁后(2021-2022 年和 2022-2023 年)的过渡时期。该研究旨在应对教育机构的大量能源需求所带来的挑战,这些需求极大地增加了温室气体的排放量。对于教育机构来说,实现净零排放仍然是一项艰巨的任务,即使有远程工作和学习等选择。这项研究强调,尽管学生有可能利用正确的信息和资源在减少温室气体排放问题上发挥作用,但这些问题始终没有得到充分解决。研究采用了《温室气体议定书》方法来计算能源的范围 1 碳足迹,包括煤油、汽油、柴油和液化石油气。这种方法使教育机构和企业能够建立可靠的温室气体排放清单,便于监测进展情况和培养与气候目标相一致的可持续做法。通过利用《温室气体议定书》,该研究评估了煤油、汽油、柴油和液化石油气等能源的范畴 1 排放量,为教育机构提供了一种系统方法,以建立与气候目标相一致的可靠清单。研究结果表明,煤油是主要的排放源,因此研究建议减少传统能源的使用,向替代能源过渡。此外,研究还进行了范围 2 排放计算,以比较电力消费产生的碳足迹,并将煤炭发电与水力发电进行对比。研究为大学利用计算的碳足迹确定有效的减排战略提供了宝贵的见解。研究指出信息差距和数据收集效率低下是重大挑战,并提出节能措施和强化采购战略作为有益的减排措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Carbon Footprint Analysis and Environmental Initiatives: A Case Study of Himachal Pradesh University, Shimla, H.P., INDIA
Carbon footprints (CFs) serve as a metric for quantifying the release of greenhouse gases (GHGs) attributable to a specific organization or activity. Taking a step towards fostering sustainable practices in education institution involves reporting CF levels within college campuses. This research centers on computing the carbon footprint of Himachal Pradesh University's Shimla campus (2020-2023), with a focus on understanding emissions trends, particularly the transition from lockdown (2020–2021) to post-lockdown (2021–2022 and 2022–2023) periods amid the COVID-19 pandemic. The study aims to address the challenge posed by educational institutions' substantial energy demands, contributing significantly to GHG emissions. Achieving net-zero emissions remains a formidable task for educational institutions, even with options like remote work and learning. The study underscores the persisting challenge of insufficiently addressing these concerns, despite the potential for students to play a role in mitigating greenhouse gas emission issues with the right information and resources. The research employs the Greenhouse Gas Protocol method to compute the Scope 1 carbon footprint of energy sources, encompassing kerosene, petrol, diesel, and LPG. This approach empowers educational institutions and businesses to construct dependable inventories of their GHG emissions, facilitating progress monitoring and the cultivation of sustainable practices aligned with climate objectives. By utilizing the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, the study evaluates Scope 1 emissions from energy sources like kerosene, petrol, diesel, and LPG, offering a systematic approach for institutions to create reliable inventories aligned with climate goals. The findings highlight kerosene as the predominant contributor, prompting the study to recommend curbing the use of conventional energy sources and transitioning to alternatives. Additionally, the research conducts Scope 2 emission calculations to compare the carbon footprint resulting from electricity consumption, contrasting coal-based electricity generation with hydropower generation. Valuable insights are provided for universities to leverage calculated carbon footprints in identifying effective emission reduction strategies. The study identifies information gaps and inefficient data collection as significant challenges, proposing energy-saving measures and enhanced procurement strategies as beneficial mitigation measures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信