爱沙尼亚和印度尼西亚选举制度的比较:I-Voting 的实施

Umi Rofiatun Munawaroh
{"title":"爱沙尼亚和印度尼西亚选举制度的比较:I-Voting 的实施","authors":"Umi Rofiatun Munawaroh","doi":"10.24239/blc.v17i2.1835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses a comparison of the electoral systems that tahe place in Indonesian and Estonia. Estonia is a country that implements Parlianmentary democracy while Indonesian is a country that implements Pancasila Democracy. Estonia is a republic with a president as head of state and a prime minister as head of goverment. Indonesian has the same form of state as Estonia, namely a republic. However, Indonesian does not adhere to a parlianmentary system which is reflected in the president’s position as head of government who is assisted in carrying out his duties by the vice presdient. Estonia is considered a developed country because it has an all-electronic government system or can be accessed via the internet. This has been implemented in an election system called e-voting since 2005. Until now, Indonesia still uses the conventional voting system through ballots. Many problems arise in the conventional electoral system through ballots considering Indonesia’s vast territory and difficulties in accessing election logistics. Therefore, a discussion on the comparison of the two countries in the general  electoral system is to find out the similarities and differences in the system applied. The method used in this research is a literature study using a comparative approach. The method used in this research is a literature study using a comparative approach. The research method uses literature study by quoting data from websites, journals and books that discuss the general election system in Indonesia and Estonia. The results of this research are a comparison of the electoral system of Indonesia and Estonia. It is especially important for Indonesia to be able to modify Estonia’s general election system which is considered very modern because it uses Internet Voting.","PeriodicalId":393722,"journal":{"name":"Bilancia: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum","volume":"21 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Komparasi Sistem Pemilihan Umum Estonia - Indonesia : Penerapan I-Voting\",\"authors\":\"Umi Rofiatun Munawaroh\",\"doi\":\"10.24239/blc.v17i2.1835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article discusses a comparison of the electoral systems that tahe place in Indonesian and Estonia. Estonia is a country that implements Parlianmentary democracy while Indonesian is a country that implements Pancasila Democracy. Estonia is a republic with a president as head of state and a prime minister as head of goverment. Indonesian has the same form of state as Estonia, namely a republic. However, Indonesian does not adhere to a parlianmentary system which is reflected in the president’s position as head of government who is assisted in carrying out his duties by the vice presdient. Estonia is considered a developed country because it has an all-electronic government system or can be accessed via the internet. This has been implemented in an election system called e-voting since 2005. Until now, Indonesia still uses the conventional voting system through ballots. Many problems arise in the conventional electoral system through ballots considering Indonesia’s vast territory and difficulties in accessing election logistics. Therefore, a discussion on the comparison of the two countries in the general  electoral system is to find out the similarities and differences in the system applied. The method used in this research is a literature study using a comparative approach. The method used in this research is a literature study using a comparative approach. The research method uses literature study by quoting data from websites, journals and books that discuss the general election system in Indonesia and Estonia. The results of this research are a comparison of the electoral system of Indonesia and Estonia. It is especially important for Indonesia to be able to modify Estonia’s general election system which is considered very modern because it uses Internet Voting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":393722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bilancia: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum\",\"volume\":\"21 15\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bilancia: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24239/blc.v17i2.1835\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bilancia: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24239/blc.v17i2.1835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论印度尼西亚和爱沙尼亚选举制度的比较。爱沙尼亚实行议会民主制,而印度尼西亚实行潘查希拉民主制。爱沙尼亚是共和制国家,总统是国家元首,总理是政府首脑。印度尼西亚的国家形式与爱沙尼亚相同,即共和制。不过,印尼不实行议会制,这体现在总统作为政府首脑,由副总统协助其履行职责。爱沙尼亚被认为是一个发达国家,因为它有一个全电子化的政府系统,可以通过互联网访问。自 2005 年起,爱沙尼亚开始采用名为 "电子投票 "的选举系统。迄今为止,印度尼西亚仍在使用传统的选票投票系统。考虑到印尼幅员辽阔和选举物流的困难,通过选票进行的传统选举系统出现了许多问题。因此,讨论两国在一般选举制度方面的比较是为了找出所采用制度的异同。本研究采用的方法是比较法文献研究。本研究采用的方法是比较法文献研究法。研究方法采用文献研究法,从讨论印度尼西亚和爱沙尼亚大选制度的网站、期刊和书籍中引用数据。本研究的结果是对印尼和爱沙尼亚选举制度的比较。对于印尼来说,修改爱沙尼亚的大选制度尤为重要,因为爱沙尼亚的大选制度使用互联网投票,被认为是非常现代化的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Komparasi Sistem Pemilihan Umum Estonia - Indonesia : Penerapan I-Voting
This article discusses a comparison of the electoral systems that tahe place in Indonesian and Estonia. Estonia is a country that implements Parlianmentary democracy while Indonesian is a country that implements Pancasila Democracy. Estonia is a republic with a president as head of state and a prime minister as head of goverment. Indonesian has the same form of state as Estonia, namely a republic. However, Indonesian does not adhere to a parlianmentary system which is reflected in the president’s position as head of government who is assisted in carrying out his duties by the vice presdient. Estonia is considered a developed country because it has an all-electronic government system or can be accessed via the internet. This has been implemented in an election system called e-voting since 2005. Until now, Indonesia still uses the conventional voting system through ballots. Many problems arise in the conventional electoral system through ballots considering Indonesia’s vast territory and difficulties in accessing election logistics. Therefore, a discussion on the comparison of the two countries in the general  electoral system is to find out the similarities and differences in the system applied. The method used in this research is a literature study using a comparative approach. The method used in this research is a literature study using a comparative approach. The research method uses literature study by quoting data from websites, journals and books that discuss the general election system in Indonesia and Estonia. The results of this research are a comparison of the electoral system of Indonesia and Estonia. It is especially important for Indonesia to be able to modify Estonia’s general election system which is considered very modern because it uses Internet Voting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信