伊斯兰教商业法对伊斯兰教金融机构逾期分期付款罚款处罚的意见比较

Muhammad Syarif Hidayatullah, Ragil Rahmatullah Nurhakim
{"title":"伊斯兰教商业法对伊斯兰教金融机构逾期分期付款罚款处罚的意见比较","authors":"Muhammad Syarif Hidayatullah, Ragil Rahmatullah Nurhakim","doi":"10.24239/blc.v17i2.2067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Islamic Financial Institutions are financial institutions whose operations are based on Sharia principles or Islamic legal rules in the financial transactions that are carried out. Closely to conventional financial institutions, fines for late payment of installments by customers are also applied by Islamic financial institutions whose legality refers to the DSN-MUI fatwa on sanctions against capable customers who delay payments. The issue of fines eventually creates problems and debates on its legality and relevance to sharia principles. This research aimed to compare sharia business law opinions on issues of fines for late installment payments at Islamic financial institutions. The research method employed was normative legal research with a comparative approach. The research results revealed the difference of opinions on the existence and legal status of these fines in Islamic financial institutions. Leastwise, there are two legal opinions: (1) it is permissible on condition that fines are only given to capable customers who delay payments (under specific criteria, not absolute permissibility) and that fines must be designated as social funds. Meanwhile, (2) disapproving opinion to assume that this fine is similar to usury; hence, it is forbidden.","PeriodicalId":393722,"journal":{"name":"Bilancia: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum","volume":"28 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARISON OF SHARIA BUSINESS LAW OPINIONS ON FINE SANCTIONS FOR LATE PAYMENT OF INSTALLMENTS IN SHARIA FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Syarif Hidayatullah, Ragil Rahmatullah Nurhakim\",\"doi\":\"10.24239/blc.v17i2.2067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Islamic Financial Institutions are financial institutions whose operations are based on Sharia principles or Islamic legal rules in the financial transactions that are carried out. Closely to conventional financial institutions, fines for late payment of installments by customers are also applied by Islamic financial institutions whose legality refers to the DSN-MUI fatwa on sanctions against capable customers who delay payments. The issue of fines eventually creates problems and debates on its legality and relevance to sharia principles. This research aimed to compare sharia business law opinions on issues of fines for late installment payments at Islamic financial institutions. The research method employed was normative legal research with a comparative approach. The research results revealed the difference of opinions on the existence and legal status of these fines in Islamic financial institutions. Leastwise, there are two legal opinions: (1) it is permissible on condition that fines are only given to capable customers who delay payments (under specific criteria, not absolute permissibility) and that fines must be designated as social funds. Meanwhile, (2) disapproving opinion to assume that this fine is similar to usury; hence, it is forbidden.\",\"PeriodicalId\":393722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bilancia: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum\",\"volume\":\"28 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bilancia: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24239/blc.v17i2.2067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bilancia: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24239/blc.v17i2.2067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

伊斯兰金融机构是指根据伊斯兰教法原则或伊斯兰法律规则进行金融交易的金融机构。与传统金融机构类似,伊斯兰金融机构也会对延迟支付分期付款的客户处以罚款,其合法性参考了 DSN-MUI 法特瓦关于制裁延迟付款的有能力客户的规定。罚款问题最终引发了关于其合法性和与伊斯兰教法原则相关性的问题和争论。本研究旨在比较伊斯兰教商业法对伊斯兰金融机构逾期分期付款罚款问题的看法。采用的研究方法是比较法规范性法律研究。研究结果揭示了伊斯兰金融机构对这些罚款的存在和法律地位的不同看法。大体上有两种法律观点:(1) 允许罚款,条件是只对有能力延迟付款的客户进行罚款(根据特定标准,不是绝对允许),罚款必须指定为社会基金。同时,(2)不赞成的意见认为这种罚款类似于高利贷,因此是被禁止的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COMPARISON OF SHARIA BUSINESS LAW OPINIONS ON FINE SANCTIONS FOR LATE PAYMENT OF INSTALLMENTS IN SHARIA FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
Islamic Financial Institutions are financial institutions whose operations are based on Sharia principles or Islamic legal rules in the financial transactions that are carried out. Closely to conventional financial institutions, fines for late payment of installments by customers are also applied by Islamic financial institutions whose legality refers to the DSN-MUI fatwa on sanctions against capable customers who delay payments. The issue of fines eventually creates problems and debates on its legality and relevance to sharia principles. This research aimed to compare sharia business law opinions on issues of fines for late installment payments at Islamic financial institutions. The research method employed was normative legal research with a comparative approach. The research results revealed the difference of opinions on the existence and legal status of these fines in Islamic financial institutions. Leastwise, there are two legal opinions: (1) it is permissible on condition that fines are only given to capable customers who delay payments (under specific criteria, not absolute permissibility) and that fines must be designated as social funds. Meanwhile, (2) disapproving opinion to assume that this fine is similar to usury; hence, it is forbidden.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信