二项式期权定价模型股息的麻烦

IF 0.6 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Yisong S. Tian
{"title":"二项式期权定价模型股息的麻烦","authors":"Yisong S. Tian","doi":"10.1142/s2424786323500391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We identify a problem in the widely used binomial option pricing model when it is used to value options on an asset paying continuous dividends. It does not value pairs of European spot and futures options consistently even though they are theoretically equivalent. The inconsistency arises from the way dividend yield is incorporated into the jumps and probabilities. In addition, the model also has the tendency to undervalue American options due to suboptimal early exercise decisions. While the lingering effect of this problem diminishes asymptotically, it is nonetheless a concern for someone just beginning to learn the model or in applications where the use of a sufficiently large binomial tree is not practical or economical. We propose a simple modification to solve the problem and demonstrate the effectiveness of the solution.","PeriodicalId":54088,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Financial Engineering","volume":"31 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The binomial option pricing model: The trouble with dividends\",\"authors\":\"Yisong S. Tian\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/s2424786323500391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We identify a problem in the widely used binomial option pricing model when it is used to value options on an asset paying continuous dividends. It does not value pairs of European spot and futures options consistently even though they are theoretically equivalent. The inconsistency arises from the way dividend yield is incorporated into the jumps and probabilities. In addition, the model also has the tendency to undervalue American options due to suboptimal early exercise decisions. While the lingering effect of this problem diminishes asymptotically, it is nonetheless a concern for someone just beginning to learn the model or in applications where the use of a sufficiently large binomial tree is not practical or economical. We propose a simple modification to solve the problem and demonstrate the effectiveness of the solution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Financial Engineering\",\"volume\":\"31 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Financial Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2424786323500391\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Financial Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2424786323500391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当二叉期权定价模型被用于对连续支付股息的资产期权进行估值时,我们发现了广泛使用的二叉期权定价模型中存在的一个问题。尽管欧洲现货期权和期货期权在理论上是等价的,但二项式期权定价模型对这两种期权的估值并不一致。不一致的原因在于股息率被纳入跳跃和概率的方式。此外,该模型还倾向于低估美式期权的价值,原因是早期行权决策不够理想。虽然这个问题的影响会逐渐减小,但对于刚刚开始学习模型的人来说,或者在使用足够大的二叉树不切实际或不经济的应用中,这仍然是一个值得关注的问题。我们提出了一个简单的修改方案来解决这个问题,并演示了该方案的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The binomial option pricing model: The trouble with dividends
We identify a problem in the widely used binomial option pricing model when it is used to value options on an asset paying continuous dividends. It does not value pairs of European spot and futures options consistently even though they are theoretically equivalent. The inconsistency arises from the way dividend yield is incorporated into the jumps and probabilities. In addition, the model also has the tendency to undervalue American options due to suboptimal early exercise decisions. While the lingering effect of this problem diminishes asymptotically, it is nonetheless a concern for someone just beginning to learn the model or in applications where the use of a sufficiently large binomial tree is not practical or economical. We propose a simple modification to solve the problem and demonstrate the effectiveness of the solution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信