PARP 抑制剂治疗转移性尿路上皮癌:疗效与安全性系统综述

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Bladder Cancer Pub Date : 2023-12-13 DOI:10.3233/blc-230071
S. Crabb, Taha Khalid, Lois Woods, Geoff Frampton, Jonathan Shepherd
{"title":"PARP 抑制剂治疗转移性尿路上皮癌:疗效与安全性系统综述","authors":"S. Crabb, Taha Khalid, Lois Woods, Geoff Frampton, Jonathan Shepherd","doi":"10.3233/blc-230071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have activity in various cancers. Metastatic urothelial carcinoma (MUC) is platinum sensitive and a subset harbour DNA repair gene alterations. OBJECTIVE: To assess evidence for efficacy and safety of PARP inhibition for MUC. METHODS: This systematic review included randomised clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating PARP inhibitors as monotherapy, or in therapeutic combinations, compared to relevant comparators or best supportive care. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from March 2013 to March 2023. Each study was appraised using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 Tool. Study results were synthesised descriptively. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42023403145. RESULTS: From 247 identified reports, we included three phase 2 RCTs including 252 patients. Two RCTs assessed PARP inhibition in unselected patient groups (one first line platinum ineligible, one post chemotherapy maintenance) and found no evidence of efficacy. All three RCTs assessed subgroups defined by biomarker selection for somatic DNA repair defects. Two of these identified PFS benefit with PARP inhibition compared to a relevant comparator (one first line in combination with immunotherapy, one maintenance monotherapy). Safety outcomes were consistent with prior experience of PARP inhibitors. The risk of bias across the outcomes was generally low. CONCLUSIONS: PARP inhibitors lack efficacy for unselected MUC patients. Phase 2 RCTs support further investigation of PARP inhibition within biomarker-selected patient subsets. The optimal biomarker is not yet determined. Limitations in the current evidence relate to small sample sizes and low statistical power.","PeriodicalId":54217,"journal":{"name":"Bladder Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PARP Inhibitors for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety\",\"authors\":\"S. Crabb, Taha Khalid, Lois Woods, Geoff Frampton, Jonathan Shepherd\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/blc-230071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have activity in various cancers. Metastatic urothelial carcinoma (MUC) is platinum sensitive and a subset harbour DNA repair gene alterations. OBJECTIVE: To assess evidence for efficacy and safety of PARP inhibition for MUC. METHODS: This systematic review included randomised clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating PARP inhibitors as monotherapy, or in therapeutic combinations, compared to relevant comparators or best supportive care. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from March 2013 to March 2023. Each study was appraised using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 Tool. Study results were synthesised descriptively. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42023403145. RESULTS: From 247 identified reports, we included three phase 2 RCTs including 252 patients. Two RCTs assessed PARP inhibition in unselected patient groups (one first line platinum ineligible, one post chemotherapy maintenance) and found no evidence of efficacy. All three RCTs assessed subgroups defined by biomarker selection for somatic DNA repair defects. Two of these identified PFS benefit with PARP inhibition compared to a relevant comparator (one first line in combination with immunotherapy, one maintenance monotherapy). Safety outcomes were consistent with prior experience of PARP inhibitors. The risk of bias across the outcomes was generally low. CONCLUSIONS: PARP inhibitors lack efficacy for unselected MUC patients. Phase 2 RCTs support further investigation of PARP inhibition within biomarker-selected patient subsets. The optimal biomarker is not yet determined. Limitations in the current evidence relate to small sample sizes and low statistical power.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bladder Cancer\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bladder Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/blc-230071\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bladder Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/blc-230071","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:聚(ADP-核糖)聚合酶(PARP)抑制剂在多种癌症中具有活性。转移性尿路上皮癌(MUC)对铂敏感,其中一部分存在 DNA 修复基因改变。目的:评估 PARP 抑制剂治疗 MUC 的有效性和安全性证据。方法:本系统综述包括评估 PARP 抑制剂作为单一疗法或治疗组合与相关比较药或最佳支持治疗的随机临床试验 (RCT)。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)。我们检索了 2013 年 3 月至 2023 年 3 月期间的 MEDLINE (Ovid)、EMBASE、ClinicalTrials.gov 和 Cochrane 对照试验中央登记册。采用 Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 工具对每项研究进行评估。对研究结果进行描述性综合。注册:PROPERCO CRD42023403145。结果:从 247 份已确定的报告中,我们纳入了三项 2 期 RCT,其中包括 252 名患者。其中两项研究评估了未经选择的患者群体(一个是不符合铂类药物治疗条件的一线患者,一个是化疗后维持治疗的患者)中的 PARP 抑制作用,结果发现没有证据表明其具有疗效。所有三项研究都评估了通过生物标记物选择确定的体细胞 DNA 修复缺陷亚组。其中两项研究发现,PARP 抑制剂与相关的比较药相比(一项是与免疫疗法联合的一线治疗,一项是单药维持治疗),PFS 有益。安全性结果与以往使用PARP抑制剂的经验一致。各项结果的偏倚风险普遍较低。结论:PARP抑制剂对未经选择的MUC患者缺乏疗效。2期临床试验支持在生物标志物选定的患者子集中进一步研究PARP抑制剂。最佳生物标志物尚未确定。现有证据的局限性与样本量小和统计能力低有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PARP Inhibitors for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety
BACKGROUND: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have activity in various cancers. Metastatic urothelial carcinoma (MUC) is platinum sensitive and a subset harbour DNA repair gene alterations. OBJECTIVE: To assess evidence for efficacy and safety of PARP inhibition for MUC. METHODS: This systematic review included randomised clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating PARP inhibitors as monotherapy, or in therapeutic combinations, compared to relevant comparators or best supportive care. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from March 2013 to March 2023. Each study was appraised using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 Tool. Study results were synthesised descriptively. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42023403145. RESULTS: From 247 identified reports, we included three phase 2 RCTs including 252 patients. Two RCTs assessed PARP inhibition in unselected patient groups (one first line platinum ineligible, one post chemotherapy maintenance) and found no evidence of efficacy. All three RCTs assessed subgroups defined by biomarker selection for somatic DNA repair defects. Two of these identified PFS benefit with PARP inhibition compared to a relevant comparator (one first line in combination with immunotherapy, one maintenance monotherapy). Safety outcomes were consistent with prior experience of PARP inhibitors. The risk of bias across the outcomes was generally low. CONCLUSIONS: PARP inhibitors lack efficacy for unselected MUC patients. Phase 2 RCTs support further investigation of PARP inhibition within biomarker-selected patient subsets. The optimal biomarker is not yet determined. Limitations in the current evidence relate to small sample sizes and low statistical power.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bladder Cancer
Bladder Cancer Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Bladder Cancer is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the epidemiology/etiology, genetics, molecular correlates, pathogenesis, pharmacology, ethics, patient advocacy and survivorship, diagnosis and treatment of tumors of the bladder and upper urinary tract. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research in basic science, translational research and clinical medicine that expedites our fundamental understanding and improves treatment of tumors of the bladder and upper urinary tract.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信