受地震荷载影响的高层建筑中外伸桁架和带式桁架系统的行为和最佳位置

Sunil Khadka, Thaman Bahadur Khadka, Rabi Thapa Magar, Bikram Rawat
{"title":"受地震荷载影响的高层建筑中外伸桁架和带式桁架系统的行为和最佳位置","authors":"Sunil Khadka, Thaman Bahadur Khadka, Rabi Thapa Magar, Bikram Rawat","doi":"10.3126/scitech.v17i1.60465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is focused on the efficient use of the lateral load-resisting system for high-rise concrete buildings subjected to earthquake load. 32-storey three-dimensional models of OMRF, SMRF, core, core with outrigger (OT), core with outrigger and cap truss, and core with belt truss (BT) and core with belt truss and their cap truss systems are analyzed and compared to find the lateral displacement, storey drift and time-period reduction. The modelling and analysis were performed using finite element software ETABS 2016. The analysis has been carried out to study the effect and performance of the outrigger system and belt truss system in the building. These systems are provided at different levels along the height of the building. The coverage of the outrigger and belt trusses are equal to the height of the typical story and maintained the same in all the models. For finding the optimum position of the outrigger and belt truss system and also with their cap truss, the result is illustrated in terms of the reduction of top-storey lateral deflection, the maximum reduction in storey drift and the maximum reduction in the time period of the building. All the parameters are obtained for the structure without an outrigger system and they are compared with the values obtained by introducing an outrigger and belt truss. A total of 51 models are studied for finding the optimum location and behaviour of the systems when introduced on the building. A comparison is made to find the best system among all the systems, which are introduced in the model. Among the entire systems, an outrigger with a belt truss is found to be the best system in terms of reducing deflection, drift, time and base shear. The optimum position is found to be at 0.375 times the height of the total structure when the user system is outrigger and its belt system in terms of reduction in deflection and time, whereas the optimum position is at mid-height when the selection criterion is lateral drift.","PeriodicalId":183221,"journal":{"name":"SCITECH Nepal","volume":"113 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Behavior And Optimum Location Of Outrigger And Belt Truss System In High-Rise Buildings Subject To Seismic Loading\",\"authors\":\"Sunil Khadka, Thaman Bahadur Khadka, Rabi Thapa Magar, Bikram Rawat\",\"doi\":\"10.3126/scitech.v17i1.60465\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study is focused on the efficient use of the lateral load-resisting system for high-rise concrete buildings subjected to earthquake load. 32-storey three-dimensional models of OMRF, SMRF, core, core with outrigger (OT), core with outrigger and cap truss, and core with belt truss (BT) and core with belt truss and their cap truss systems are analyzed and compared to find the lateral displacement, storey drift and time-period reduction. The modelling and analysis were performed using finite element software ETABS 2016. The analysis has been carried out to study the effect and performance of the outrigger system and belt truss system in the building. These systems are provided at different levels along the height of the building. The coverage of the outrigger and belt trusses are equal to the height of the typical story and maintained the same in all the models. For finding the optimum position of the outrigger and belt truss system and also with their cap truss, the result is illustrated in terms of the reduction of top-storey lateral deflection, the maximum reduction in storey drift and the maximum reduction in the time period of the building. All the parameters are obtained for the structure without an outrigger system and they are compared with the values obtained by introducing an outrigger and belt truss. A total of 51 models are studied for finding the optimum location and behaviour of the systems when introduced on the building. A comparison is made to find the best system among all the systems, which are introduced in the model. Among the entire systems, an outrigger with a belt truss is found to be the best system in terms of reducing deflection, drift, time and base shear. The optimum position is found to be at 0.375 times the height of the total structure when the user system is outrigger and its belt system in terms of reduction in deflection and time, whereas the optimum position is at mid-height when the selection criterion is lateral drift.\",\"PeriodicalId\":183221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SCITECH Nepal\",\"volume\":\"113 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SCITECH Nepal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3126/scitech.v17i1.60465\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SCITECH Nepal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/scitech.v17i1.60465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的重点是如何有效利用承受地震荷载的高层混凝土建筑的抗侧力系统。通过分析和比较 OMRF、SMRF、核心筒、带支腿(OT)的核心筒、带支腿和帽桁架的核心筒、带桁架(BT)的核心筒和带桁架及其帽桁架系统的 32 层三维模型,找出侧向位移、层间漂移和时间周期减少量。建模和分析使用有限元软件 ETABS 2016 进行。分析旨在研究建筑中支腿系统和带状桁架系统的效果和性能。这些系统沿建筑高度分布在不同楼层。支腿和带状桁架的覆盖范围与典型楼层的高度相等,并且在所有模型中保持不变。为了找到支腿和带状桁架系统的最佳位置,以及它们与帽状桁架的最佳位置,结果显示了顶层侧向挠度的减少量、层间漂移的最大减少量以及建筑物时间周期的最大减少量。所有参数都是在没有支腿系统的情况下获得的,并与引入支腿和带状桁架后获得的值进行了比较。共对 51 个模型进行了研究,以找出系统在建筑物上的最佳位置和性能。通过比较,在模型中引入的所有系统中找出最佳系统。在所有系统中,带桁架的支腿系统在减少挠度、漂移、时间和基底剪力方面被认为是最佳系统。在减少挠度和时间方面,当用户系统为支腿及其带式系统时,发现最佳位置位于总结构高度的 0.375 倍处;而当选择标准为横向漂移时,最佳位置位于结构的中间高度处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Behavior And Optimum Location Of Outrigger And Belt Truss System In High-Rise Buildings Subject To Seismic Loading
This study is focused on the efficient use of the lateral load-resisting system for high-rise concrete buildings subjected to earthquake load. 32-storey three-dimensional models of OMRF, SMRF, core, core with outrigger (OT), core with outrigger and cap truss, and core with belt truss (BT) and core with belt truss and their cap truss systems are analyzed and compared to find the lateral displacement, storey drift and time-period reduction. The modelling and analysis were performed using finite element software ETABS 2016. The analysis has been carried out to study the effect and performance of the outrigger system and belt truss system in the building. These systems are provided at different levels along the height of the building. The coverage of the outrigger and belt trusses are equal to the height of the typical story and maintained the same in all the models. For finding the optimum position of the outrigger and belt truss system and also with their cap truss, the result is illustrated in terms of the reduction of top-storey lateral deflection, the maximum reduction in storey drift and the maximum reduction in the time period of the building. All the parameters are obtained for the structure without an outrigger system and they are compared with the values obtained by introducing an outrigger and belt truss. A total of 51 models are studied for finding the optimum location and behaviour of the systems when introduced on the building. A comparison is made to find the best system among all the systems, which are introduced in the model. Among the entire systems, an outrigger with a belt truss is found to be the best system in terms of reducing deflection, drift, time and base shear. The optimum position is found to be at 0.375 times the height of the total structure when the user system is outrigger and its belt system in terms of reduction in deflection and time, whereas the optimum position is at mid-height when the selection criterion is lateral drift.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信