Shery Susan Philip, R. Janardana, Padmanabha D. Shenoy, C. Kavadichanda, D. Bairwa, G. Sircar, Parasar Ghosh, A. Wakhlu, Sumithra Selvam, Dinesh Khanna, V. Shobha
{"title":"探索性系统性硬化症临床亚组聚类 印度进行性系统性硬化症登记的结果","authors":"Shery Susan Philip, R. Janardana, Padmanabha D. Shenoy, C. Kavadichanda, D. Bairwa, G. Sircar, Parasar Ghosh, A. Wakhlu, Sumithra Selvam, Dinesh Khanna, V. Shobha","doi":"10.1177/23971983231215470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To conduct an exploratory cluster analysis of systemic sclerosis patients from the baseline data of the Indian systemic sclerosis registry. Patients satisfying American College of Rheumatology-European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for systemic sclerosis were included. The clusters formed using clinical and immunological parameters were compared. Of the 564 systemic sclerosis registry participants, 404 patients were included. We derived four clusters of which three were anti-topoisomerase I predominant and one was anti-centromere antibody 2 dominant. Cluster 1 ( n-82 (20.3%)) had diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis patients with the most severe skin disease, anti-topoisomerase I positivity, males, younger age of onset and high prevalence of musculoskeletal, vasculopathic and gastrointestinal features. Cluster 2 ( n-141 (34.9%)) was also diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis and anti-topoisomerase I predominant but with less severe skin phenotype than cluster 1 and a lesser prevalence of musculoskeletal, vasculopathic and gastrointestinal features. Cluster 3 ( n-119 (29.5%)) had limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis patients with anti-topoisomerase I positivity along with other antibodies. The proximal muscle weakness was higher and digital pitting scars were lower, while other organ involvement was similar between clusters 2 and 3. Cluster 4 ( n-62 (15.30%)) was the least severe group with limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis and anti-centromere antibody predominance. Age of onset was higher with low musculoskeletal disease and a higher presence of upper gastrointestinal features. The prevalence of interstitial lung disease was similar in the three anti-topoisomerase I predominant clusters. With exploratory cluster analysis, we confirmed the possibility of subclassification of systemic sclerosis along a spectrum based on clinical and immunological characteristics. We also corroborated the presence of anti-topoisomerase I in limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis and the association of interstitial lung disease with anti-topoisomerase I.","PeriodicalId":17036,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploratory clinical subgroup clustering in systemic sclerosis Results from the Indian Progressive Systemic Sclerosis Registry\",\"authors\":\"Shery Susan Philip, R. Janardana, Padmanabha D. Shenoy, C. Kavadichanda, D. Bairwa, G. Sircar, Parasar Ghosh, A. Wakhlu, Sumithra Selvam, Dinesh Khanna, V. Shobha\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23971983231215470\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To conduct an exploratory cluster analysis of systemic sclerosis patients from the baseline data of the Indian systemic sclerosis registry. Patients satisfying American College of Rheumatology-European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for systemic sclerosis were included. The clusters formed using clinical and immunological parameters were compared. Of the 564 systemic sclerosis registry participants, 404 patients were included. We derived four clusters of which three were anti-topoisomerase I predominant and one was anti-centromere antibody 2 dominant. Cluster 1 ( n-82 (20.3%)) had diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis patients with the most severe skin disease, anti-topoisomerase I positivity, males, younger age of onset and high prevalence of musculoskeletal, vasculopathic and gastrointestinal features. Cluster 2 ( n-141 (34.9%)) was also diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis and anti-topoisomerase I predominant but with less severe skin phenotype than cluster 1 and a lesser prevalence of musculoskeletal, vasculopathic and gastrointestinal features. Cluster 3 ( n-119 (29.5%)) had limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis patients with anti-topoisomerase I positivity along with other antibodies. The proximal muscle weakness was higher and digital pitting scars were lower, while other organ involvement was similar between clusters 2 and 3. Cluster 4 ( n-62 (15.30%)) was the least severe group with limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis and anti-centromere antibody predominance. Age of onset was higher with low musculoskeletal disease and a higher presence of upper gastrointestinal features. The prevalence of interstitial lung disease was similar in the three anti-topoisomerase I predominant clusters. With exploratory cluster analysis, we confirmed the possibility of subclassification of systemic sclerosis along a spectrum based on clinical and immunological characteristics. We also corroborated the presence of anti-topoisomerase I in limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis and the association of interstitial lung disease with anti-topoisomerase I.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23971983231215470\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23971983231215470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
对印度系统性硬化症登记处基线数据中的系统性硬化症患者进行探索性聚类分析。纳入符合美国风湿病学会-欧洲抗风湿病联盟系统性硬化症分类标准的患者。对利用临床和免疫学参数形成的群组进行了比较。在 564 名系统性硬化症登记参与者中,我们纳入了 404 名患者。我们得出了四个群组,其中三个以抗拓扑异构酶 I 为主,一个以抗中心粒抗体 2 为主。第 1 组(82 人(20.3%))为弥漫性皮肤系统性硬化症患者,皮肤病最严重,抗拓扑异构酶 I 阳性,男性,发病年龄较小,肌肉骨骼、血管病变和胃肠道特征发病率较高。第 2 组(141 人(34.9%))也是弥漫性皮肤系统性硬化症,以抗拓扑异构酶 I 阳性为主,但皮肤表型不如第 1 组严重,肌肉骨骼、血管病变和胃肠道特征的发病率较低。第 3 组(119 人(29.5%))有局限性皮肤系统性硬化症患者,抗拓扑异构酶 I 阳性,同时伴有其他抗体。第 2 组和第 3 组患者的近端肌无力程度较高,数字点状疤痕程度较低,其他器官受累情况相似。第4组(n-62(15.30%))是病情最轻的一组,有局限性皮肤系统性硬化,抗中心粒抗体占优势。发病年龄较高,肌肉骨骼疾病较少,上消化道特征较多。在三个以抗拓扑异构酶I为主的群组中,间质性肺病的发病率相似。通过探索性聚类分析,我们证实了根据临床和免疫学特征对系统硬化症进行亚分类的可能性。我们还证实了局限性皮肤系统性硬化症中抗拓扑异构酶I的存在,以及间质性肺病与抗拓扑异构酶I的关联。
Exploratory clinical subgroup clustering in systemic sclerosis Results from the Indian Progressive Systemic Sclerosis Registry
To conduct an exploratory cluster analysis of systemic sclerosis patients from the baseline data of the Indian systemic sclerosis registry. Patients satisfying American College of Rheumatology-European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for systemic sclerosis were included. The clusters formed using clinical and immunological parameters were compared. Of the 564 systemic sclerosis registry participants, 404 patients were included. We derived four clusters of which three were anti-topoisomerase I predominant and one was anti-centromere antibody 2 dominant. Cluster 1 ( n-82 (20.3%)) had diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis patients with the most severe skin disease, anti-topoisomerase I positivity, males, younger age of onset and high prevalence of musculoskeletal, vasculopathic and gastrointestinal features. Cluster 2 ( n-141 (34.9%)) was also diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis and anti-topoisomerase I predominant but with less severe skin phenotype than cluster 1 and a lesser prevalence of musculoskeletal, vasculopathic and gastrointestinal features. Cluster 3 ( n-119 (29.5%)) had limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis patients with anti-topoisomerase I positivity along with other antibodies. The proximal muscle weakness was higher and digital pitting scars were lower, while other organ involvement was similar between clusters 2 and 3. Cluster 4 ( n-62 (15.30%)) was the least severe group with limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis and anti-centromere antibody predominance. Age of onset was higher with low musculoskeletal disease and a higher presence of upper gastrointestinal features. The prevalence of interstitial lung disease was similar in the three anti-topoisomerase I predominant clusters. With exploratory cluster analysis, we confirmed the possibility of subclassification of systemic sclerosis along a spectrum based on clinical and immunological characteristics. We also corroborated the presence of anti-topoisomerase I in limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis and the association of interstitial lung disease with anti-topoisomerase I.