驾驭中东争端:中国建设性干预的 "两利 "方针*

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES
Pacific Focus Pub Date : 2023-12-14 DOI:10.1111/pafo.12241
Chuchu Zhang, Sujata Ashwarya
{"title":"驾驭中东争端:中国建设性干预的 \"两利 \"方针*","authors":"Chuchu Zhang, Sujata Ashwarya","doi":"10.1111/pafo.12241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, China has sought to modify its traditional low‐key approach to the Middle East by adopting a “constructive intervention” strategy. Our research examines what China's self‐described constructive intervention entails and how it intends to implement its novel approach. Combining quantitative and qualitative research, we analyze the discourse of Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokespeople at press conferences and telephone call‐ins. Our findings indicate that the narratives of spokespeople are rich in nuance and employ various strategies to obscure their positions, including oscillatory statements, no statements, indirect statements, and responses of “no idea.” The constructive intervention is essentially a selective intervention strategy, and it provides Beijing with greater latitude and flexibility to adjust its decisions and maneuvers in order to achieve “two‐goods” foreign policy: (i) changing the undesirable elements and (ii) preserving the favorable elements of the status quo.","PeriodicalId":19923,"journal":{"name":"Pacific Focus","volume":"2007 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating Middle Eastern Disputes: The “Two‐Goods” Approach of China's Constructive Intervention*\",\"authors\":\"Chuchu Zhang, Sujata Ashwarya\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pafo.12241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, China has sought to modify its traditional low‐key approach to the Middle East by adopting a “constructive intervention” strategy. Our research examines what China's self‐described constructive intervention entails and how it intends to implement its novel approach. Combining quantitative and qualitative research, we analyze the discourse of Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokespeople at press conferences and telephone call‐ins. Our findings indicate that the narratives of spokespeople are rich in nuance and employ various strategies to obscure their positions, including oscillatory statements, no statements, indirect statements, and responses of “no idea.” The constructive intervention is essentially a selective intervention strategy, and it provides Beijing with greater latitude and flexibility to adjust its decisions and maneuvers in order to achieve “two‐goods” foreign policy: (i) changing the undesirable elements and (ii) preserving the favorable elements of the status quo.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pacific Focus\",\"volume\":\"2007 16\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pacific Focus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pafo.12241\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacific Focus","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pafo.12241","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,中国试图通过采取 "建设性干预 "战略来改变其在中东问题上的传统低调做法。我们的研究探讨了中国自诩的建设性干预的内涵,以及中国打算如何实施这种新方法。我们结合定量和定性研究,分析了中国外交部发言人在新闻发布会和电话会议上的论述。我们的研究结果表明,发言人的叙述具有丰富的细微差别,他们采用了各种策略来模糊自己的立场,包括振荡声明、无声明、间接声明和 "不知道 "的回答。建设性干预本质上是一种选择性干预策略,它为中国政府提供了更大的自由度和灵活性来调整其决策和行动,以实现外交政策的 "双赢":(1)改变不受欢迎的因素;(2)维持现状中的有利因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Navigating Middle Eastern Disputes: The “Two‐Goods” Approach of China's Constructive Intervention*
In recent years, China has sought to modify its traditional low‐key approach to the Middle East by adopting a “constructive intervention” strategy. Our research examines what China's self‐described constructive intervention entails and how it intends to implement its novel approach. Combining quantitative and qualitative research, we analyze the discourse of Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokespeople at press conferences and telephone call‐ins. Our findings indicate that the narratives of spokespeople are rich in nuance and employ various strategies to obscure their positions, including oscillatory statements, no statements, indirect statements, and responses of “no idea.” The constructive intervention is essentially a selective intervention strategy, and it provides Beijing with greater latitude and flexibility to adjust its decisions and maneuvers in order to achieve “two‐goods” foreign policy: (i) changing the undesirable elements and (ii) preserving the favorable elements of the status quo.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pacific Focus
Pacific Focus Multiple-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Pacific Focus is published on behalf of the Center for International Studies, Inha University, South Korea. The Journal is a peer-reviewed and indexed and abstracted in the Social Sciences Citation Index, Social Scisearch, Journal Citation Reports/Social Sciences Edition. Pacific Focus" scope encompasses the wide range of research interests concerning the Asia-Pacific, including: - security - regionalism - environment - migration - civil society - multi-culturalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信