接受基础胰岛素与预混胰岛素治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制和不良反应:观察研究

Prithwis Mitra, Sattik Siddhanta, Nafisha Yasmin, Gairik Sengupta
{"title":"接受基础胰岛素与预混胰岛素治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制和不良反应:观察研究","authors":"Prithwis Mitra, Sattik Siddhanta, Nafisha Yasmin, Gairik Sengupta","doi":"10.25259/ijms_204_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nSeveral studies have compared the basal-bolus (BB) and premixed (PM) insulin regimens with varying results. This study aimed to evaluate the glycemic control and occurrence of hypoglycemia with these regimens in insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) in the Indian subpopulation.\n\n\n\nThis was a 12-week (wk) prospective, observational study in 60 adult patients (distributed 1:1) with >7 years of T2D and uncontrolled with three oral drugs. Changes in glycemic parameters at wk4 and wk12 were assessed, and hypoglycemia events were also recorded.\n\n\n\nThe PM insulin showed a significant decrease in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) at wk4 from baseline (P = 0.02) and at wk12 (P < 0.001), while in the BB insulin group, the change was significant only at wk12 (P < 0.0001). There were greater reductions in the PM group in FPG at wk4 (PM vs. BB: P = 0.04) and wk12 (P = 0.03) compared to the BB group. The post-prandial plasma glucose in both groups significantly reduced from baseline at wk4 (PM group P = 0.034; BB group; P = 0.034) and wk12 (PM group P < 0.0001 and BB group: P < 0.0001). However, there were no between-group differences at wk4 (P = 0.12) but only at wk12 (P = 0.009) with greater reductions in the PM group. The PM group showed a slightly greater reduction in glycated hemoglobin versus the BB group (9.18% vs. 7.08%; P = 0.39). There was no significant difference (P = 0.49) in the incidence of hypoglycemia.\n\n\n\nBoth treatments significantly improved glycemic control and were not associated with any severe episodes of hypoglycemia. Therefore, the choice should instead be guided by the insulin-related (posology, complexity) and patient-related (dietary habits, adherence levels) factors.\n","PeriodicalId":13277,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of medical sciences","volume":"23 63","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Glycemic control and adverse effects in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving basal-bolus insulin regimen versus premixed insulin regimen: An observational study\",\"authors\":\"Prithwis Mitra, Sattik Siddhanta, Nafisha Yasmin, Gairik Sengupta\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/ijms_204_2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nSeveral studies have compared the basal-bolus (BB) and premixed (PM) insulin regimens with varying results. This study aimed to evaluate the glycemic control and occurrence of hypoglycemia with these regimens in insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) in the Indian subpopulation.\\n\\n\\n\\nThis was a 12-week (wk) prospective, observational study in 60 adult patients (distributed 1:1) with >7 years of T2D and uncontrolled with three oral drugs. Changes in glycemic parameters at wk4 and wk12 were assessed, and hypoglycemia events were also recorded.\\n\\n\\n\\nThe PM insulin showed a significant decrease in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) at wk4 from baseline (P = 0.02) and at wk12 (P < 0.001), while in the BB insulin group, the change was significant only at wk12 (P < 0.0001). There were greater reductions in the PM group in FPG at wk4 (PM vs. BB: P = 0.04) and wk12 (P = 0.03) compared to the BB group. The post-prandial plasma glucose in both groups significantly reduced from baseline at wk4 (PM group P = 0.034; BB group; P = 0.034) and wk12 (PM group P < 0.0001 and BB group: P < 0.0001). However, there were no between-group differences at wk4 (P = 0.12) but only at wk12 (P = 0.009) with greater reductions in the PM group. The PM group showed a slightly greater reduction in glycated hemoglobin versus the BB group (9.18% vs. 7.08%; P = 0.39). There was no significant difference (P = 0.49) in the incidence of hypoglycemia.\\n\\n\\n\\nBoth treatments significantly improved glycemic control and were not associated with any severe episodes of hypoglycemia. Therefore, the choice should instead be guided by the insulin-related (posology, complexity) and patient-related (dietary habits, adherence levels) factors.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":13277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian journal of medical sciences\",\"volume\":\"23 63\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian journal of medical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/ijms_204_2023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/ijms_204_2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多项研究对基础胰岛素(BB)和预混胰岛素(PM)疗法进行了比较,结果各不相同。本研究旨在评估印度亚群中胰岛素无效的 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者使用这些方案后的血糖控制情况和低血糖发生情况。这是一项为期 12 周(wk)的前瞻性观察研究,研究对象为 60 名 T2D 病史超过 7 年且三种口服药物均未控制的成年患者(分布比例为 1:1)。PM 胰岛素组在第 4 周和第 12 周的空腹血浆葡萄糖(FPG)较基线(P = 0.02)和第 12 周(P < 0.001)有显著下降,而 BB 胰岛素组仅在第 12 周有显著变化(P < 0.0001)。与 BB 组相比,PM 组在第 4 周(PM vs. BB:P = 0.04)和第 12 周(P = 0.03)的 FPG 下降幅度更大。在第 4 周(PM 组:P = 0.034;BB 组:P = 0.034)和第 12 周(PM 组:P < 0.0001;BB 组:P < 0.0001),两组的餐后血浆葡萄糖均较基线显著降低。不过,在第 4 周(P = 0.12)时没有组间差异,但在第 12 周(P = 0.009)时,PM 组的降幅更大。PM 组糖化血红蛋白的降幅略高于 BB 组(9.18% 对 7.08%;P = 0.39)。两种治疗方法都能明显改善血糖控制,而且不会导致严重的低血糖。因此,应根据胰岛素相关因素(体位、复杂性)和患者相关因素(饮食习惯、依从性水平)来做出选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Glycemic control and adverse effects in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving basal-bolus insulin regimen versus premixed insulin regimen: An observational study
Several studies have compared the basal-bolus (BB) and premixed (PM) insulin regimens with varying results. This study aimed to evaluate the glycemic control and occurrence of hypoglycemia with these regimens in insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) in the Indian subpopulation. This was a 12-week (wk) prospective, observational study in 60 adult patients (distributed 1:1) with >7 years of T2D and uncontrolled with three oral drugs. Changes in glycemic parameters at wk4 and wk12 were assessed, and hypoglycemia events were also recorded. The PM insulin showed a significant decrease in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) at wk4 from baseline (P = 0.02) and at wk12 (P < 0.001), while in the BB insulin group, the change was significant only at wk12 (P < 0.0001). There were greater reductions in the PM group in FPG at wk4 (PM vs. BB: P = 0.04) and wk12 (P = 0.03) compared to the BB group. The post-prandial plasma glucose in both groups significantly reduced from baseline at wk4 (PM group P = 0.034; BB group; P = 0.034) and wk12 (PM group P < 0.0001 and BB group: P < 0.0001). However, there were no between-group differences at wk4 (P = 0.12) but only at wk12 (P = 0.009) with greater reductions in the PM group. The PM group showed a slightly greater reduction in glycated hemoglobin versus the BB group (9.18% vs. 7.08%; P = 0.39). There was no significant difference (P = 0.49) in the incidence of hypoglycemia. Both treatments significantly improved glycemic control and were not associated with any severe episodes of hypoglycemia. Therefore, the choice should instead be guided by the insulin-related (posology, complexity) and patient-related (dietary habits, adherence levels) factors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信